AMIRANDAS
Caerthakatha
AMIRANDAS
Caerthakatha
AMIRANDAS
and I would not want to cuddle with him.
So is this how people like to rank Doctors now, rather than on their acting?
No no... it's all a bout the ACTING! Matt is an ABSURD actor IMHO.. I couldn't stand him honestly. I liked David because he was serious about being the Doctor. Chris was almost an a*****e.
I dislike Smith's Doctor, but I don't think he's a bad actor. I think Tennant got a bit hammy and hard to watch after a while, and his acting definitely deteriorated after Series 2, until it got really patchy and over-the-top. I think Eccleston was the best actor out of the three of them, and that's mainly because at the time he was in the public consciousness for his role as the horrid, rapey soldier in
28 Days Later.
Ahh I see where you're coming from. Actually I wasn't aware of Eccleston's other role. Interesting... kind of explains why I got the a*****e attitude from him. I'll admit that you're right about his acting and also David's acting in the last few seasons of his..... I just adored David, he was much more of a real doctor more than Smith for sure. Like I would trust my life with David instead of Matt. Chris.... I think the very first episode with Chris killed it for me. I was like WTF is this s**t?? If I rank them, I'd go with David, then Peter, Chris, and then Matt at the very bottom. lol Matt was just goofy. Too goofy to be the most important Doctor in the world at the time. Bah.
It's stereotyping that gives Eccleston that 'a*****e' image. He's Mancunian, and thus gets typecast as the 'Northern monkey' stereotype of angry, rough, frank-speaking, leather-wearing, slightly-dumb people. He can do so much more, but
Doctor Who, like a lot of BBC stuff, just devolves into 'LOL DAE THE NORTH IS FUNNY AND NORTHERN DIALECTS ARE STRANGE'.
You've got to remember that the first series of the show was essentially a pilot, and it was aiming for the original demographic of the pre-1989 show - children. It wasn't until Series 2 that the BBC decided to make it slightly more mature and make it a 'family show'. Which is why Series 1 was full of fart jokes and looked like what Sarah Jane Adventures became to fill the children's show niche. I don't think it's entirely fair to judge Eccleston from that, just as it isn't really fair to judge Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy for the horrible, horrible travesties of some of the episodes they got stuck with (although Six was bad xD ).
And goofy Doctors are good! Two and Four are pretty goofy. Seven had his goofy moments as well. Being a goofy manchild is how the Doctor gets people to underestimate him, which is why Douglas Adams was so good at writing for the Doctor.