Fun Laverna
butt goddess
I work straight on paper and color on the paper and scan and edit in photoshop. Mainly I just use photoshop to fix the levels and sometimes shift things around.
I used to work digitally for a few years but I was really unhappy with the line qualities. No matter how well a tool might mimic a traditional tool, it never looks the same. And that really makes a world of difference in a lot of people's work.
I don't know if it was the program I was using (GIMP), but I was really unhappy with the lines too. I just tried another program someone had recommended to me a little while ago (before I got the nerve to draw again), and it is called Fire Alpaca. I was pleasantly surprised with how smooth the lines were. I have some great art on paper though, drawn and colored, so I would love to scan these in and see how playing with the levels helps. I have never used levels before!
I'm just not a fan of the smooth line look people go for with digital stuff. I cal almost always tell the difference and like I said, no tool can actually properly mimic what the real life tool looks like on paper. Some get close but its always obvious. So i'll stick to my g nibs and brush pens. And coloring digitally doesn't appeal to me either for the same reason. Also i feel like the inability to draw a solid, smooth line on paper is a detriment.
The thing that levels are good for are making the blacks black and the whites white since scanners always wash that stuff out. Its a little more difficult to do when you're scanning in color because then you have to separate the black from the color which can be tedious sometimes.
I also just prefer to have original art I can sell at conventions. People always say that digital art is cheaper but selling a single original page for $200 covers the cost of whatever materials I used and then some. And that's just one page out of a 100 page book.