|
|
The brave knight in shining armour is..... |
so wonderful! I wish my hero would come and save me! |
|
14% |
[ 4 ] |
impressive, though I wouldn't hold my breath for one to come into my life... |
|
35% |
[ 10 ] |
great for noble ladies who are afraid of getting their feet wet. |
|
25% |
[ 7 ] |
only looking for one thing *smack* |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
*YAWN* a waste of time..... |
|
17% |
[ 5 ] |
|
Total Votes : 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:41 am
What does everyone think of the age of chivalry and shining knights in armour? I think it depends on who you are. I'm not fond of men doing anything for me, because, quite frankly, I can do it myself.
There will always be characters in fantasy that act this way; men who act like chivalrous knights, and women who act like fairytale princesses and damsels in distress, and which characters do we love and hate that we know about?
One disturbing example is Conrad from the anime Rune Soldier, who portrays himself as a handsome chivalrous knight in armour, when in fact he's a selfish weedy little man with a pretty face.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:15 pm
Not trying to sound like an arrogant person, but I think I hold myself to the codes of chivarly. About guys in armor... I could think of a better hero.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 6:36 am
Chivalry is overrated. I once learned in school that chivalry involved knights treating ladies with gentleness and respect. Only problem was these ladies were often not the knights wives (which many did have). By this account chivalry was - at least in a small part - akin to romanticized adultury.
And as for the more stereotypical chivalry, well we live in a very different age. In this modern era women have worked hard toward achieving equality with men. I'm all for this. Realistically though, women can't have it both ways. This has actually been something I've thought about when riding on crowded busses and trains (mainly from my college days). If I have a seat and I see a girl standing do I offer her the seat? Sometimes I think yes, but also I might think "She has two legs and they work just as well as mine." I wold be interested to hear what women think in this situation. Would you want to be treated with chivalry (get the seat) or equally (just as capable of standing on a moving vehicle as a man is)?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 10:11 am
If a man offered his seat to me purely because I'm a woman, I'd be very angry. I respect that men who do that think they're being gentlemanly and kind, but I'm just as capable as he is and I find it degrading.
The only time I would accept it is if I felt extremely unwell. If I had a low blood sugar (I'm diabetic), then I would expect someone to be kind in that instance because my life then depends on getting sugar back into my system or else having a hypoglycaemic fit and requiring and ambulance.
In any other case, a expecting mother should be given a seat, along with anyone who is elderly. Otherwise in my eyes it's unacceptable. Same with car doors, I have a pair of hands and can use one of them to open the car door myself unless both of those hands are full.
How though, would you explain this having relevance to how chivalry was conducted in the past? All women were considered as being frail and unable to do anything but household chores, bearing children and looking pretty. When Joan of Arc proved that wasn't the case she was condemned and burned at the stake because men were not willing to allow any women to have any glory. In fact, I think men have always been afraid of women being better than them in any field of expertise.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:13 pm
I agree with you Mel, I suppose I do consider myself somewhat of a gentleman but sometimes I can be a bit absent minded. I guess that can be misinterpreted sometimes too. Say, did you all know that in Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, you can play as a Paladin? Well, they have this ability set called "Chivalry" and the abilities they can learn and use are the following: Nurse, Defense, Cover, Subdue, Drop Weapon, Parley, Saint Cross & Holy Blade.What do you all think? Here's what a friend of mine used to wonder about them: Emerald Charm What makes a Paladin useful? I mean, sure, they've got great stat gains, but besides that. I find their abilities to be beyond mediocre. I mean, drop weapon? Why waste a turn dropping a weapon, when I can drop the character with an uber-powerful back draft? Why defend, when I can far fist and hit low enemy units? I honestly have trouble seeing a purpose to these guys. I know this doesn't really have much to do with the subject but, I just wanted you to see that. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:23 pm
Drayal: Just not when it comes to your sister? *nudgenude* wink
SK: How is gentleness and repect akin to romanticized adultry? confused
When it comes to opening doors and giving up seats on the bus I personally like it when a man is willing to do that. I do not think that most males do this in a manner of stating to me that I am inferior, but as a gesutre of curtesy. There have been times that I have held the door open for men... does that mean that I am doing this to show that I am superior? No, I do this as a courtesy. Somthing that I think is sadly on the decline.
I agree with Mel in that an expectant mother should be offered a seat, though having "been there done that" twice I will say that there are times that standing is preferable. It's nice to have the option though! I would extend this to a mother who has children in tow as well. I think that running after active children is more work than carrying one around inside of you (with the possible exception of the last trimester). Also the child may be able to sit on his or her mother's lap. Young children often have a hard time stanging for long periods of time along with the elderly.
Though this guild is set to discuss medieval topics, Mel, that does not mean that some of these topics (such as chilvary) have no relevance in the world today. chivalry 1. qualities of ideal knight: the combination of qualities expected of the ideal medieval knight, especially courage, honor, loyalty, and consideration for others, especially women 2. chivalrous behavior: considerate and courteous behavior, especially shown by a man toward women 3. medieval knighthood: the medieval concept of knighthood, and the customs, practices, social system, and religious and personal ideals associated with knights and their way of life 4. group of knights: knights, noblemen, or armed mounted soldiers, collectively or in a group ( archaic ) chivalrous 1. relating to knighthood code: relating to or reflecting the values of the medieval code of knighthood, especially courtesy, self-sacrifice, and a sense of fair play 2. considerate and courteous: describes men, or men's behavior, characterized by consideration and courtesy, especially toward women Courage, honor, loyalty, and consideration for others are all good qualities to have. What's is wrong with striving for these?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:56 am
Oh I know some things have relevance to our world. I'm not silly. sweatdrop I just hate things being done FOR me in most cases. There was a firm I worked for only for a short while, but women weren't allowed to lift boxes AT ALL. Amanda told me earlier today that the work experience she's doing at a charity shop is like that as well.
I can lift dirty great big pieces of concrete, large heavy bags of compost or bird seed (we have chickens in our back garden), and at least two boxes of very heavy books (like I did at Borders). They call it a "health and safety issue" whereas if you know you're strong enough and know your limits, there shouldn't be a problem. I'll be taken for who I am regardless. In most cases were this happens, it's a man's fear of his MASCULINITY that tells him women shouldn't do anything. Men who think like that are afraid of women being as good as them. They know there will be women that can physically and/or mentally match them in any way, but many would never admit it.
Going back in time to my mention of Joan of Arc. She could fight, but she was killed because she was a strong woman. If that isn't a demonstration of the male society's fear of it then I don't know what is. In either case, I think both men and women can be chivalrous for right and wrong reasons.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:20 pm
chivalry... long lost and overrated in it's time and this one. I'm sorry to say that I've been disappointed one to many times. I don't need a knight in shining armour but a man that can be there when I need him is a bonus. unfortunately that area is lacking. I am capable of doing things on my own. You'd think when you ask for the assistance you would recieve it but not me. As a mom tho I know that offering woman that are expecting or w/ children and elderly need the respect they deserve. ie offering of a seat, opening a door.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:38 am
Mel mentioned car doors. I think this help illustrate the point I was trying to make about chivalry. Men don't open car doors for all women, but for women they are dating and/or trying to impress (a little different than the bus seat thing or throwing your coat on a puddle - which I wold never do). Jenannen asked how it was akin to sanctioned adultury. Again this is just what I heard from one source, but basically the idea is like I mentioned above: the chivalrous knight was mainly chivalrous to a particular lady he was trying to impress - and that this particular lady would often not be the knight's wife, even if he had one.
About Joan of Arc, I don't think that she was killed because men were afraid of her being a capable leader, but because she claimed to hear voices which was considered a heresy and she was burned for witchcraft. It is important to note that she was not burned by her fellow French, for whom she led many victorious battles, but by her English enemies who captured her. Still, Mel may have a point. I wonder if the outcome would have been different had it been a teenage boy who had heard and followed voices. Christian religion is very patriarchal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:54 am
My church isn't patriarchal at all. I know that some churches are, don't get me wrong. Maybe it's because my church is Evangelical, I don't know.
Either way, what you said about car doors and such when it comes to dating, I still wouldn't have it. You don't see women holding doors open for men, and this is the precise reason why I don't like it. I only like chivalry when do it as well, by means of protecting the weak, etc. In the past, it was only men doing that kind of thing because they considered women to be weak and incapable of defending themselves.
Too often have we seen historic and fantasy films where the damsel is in distress screaming at the top of her lungs, and then the brave knight enters! "I'll save you my lady!" *saves her and they get married. Then they lived happily ever after.*
........*Hack.*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:06 am
I see your point. I guess us men just need to know what women want. I heard a story of some kids in highschool on a prom date. One young noticed after some time (I think ten to fifteen minutes) that his date had failed to come in with him and his friends and their dates. When he went out to the car to investigate his date's mysterious absence, he found her waiting in the car, refusing to come out because he had failed to open the door for her. I would have hated to have been that guy.
I also saw a cartoon at an animation film festival - a comical parody of Schoolhouse Rock about political correctness - in which a girl kicked the main character in the groin after he held a restaurant door open for her. Even if he was just a cartoon, I wouldn't want to be that guy either.
This makes life complicated for us guys. As for me I know that my mom taught me to hold doors open for people regardless of gender. At church my three year old daughter always rushes out to hold the main doors open for people as they leave - which can sometimes be annoying because she herself often won't leave because she wants to hold it open for everyone. But now I think I'm a little off topic for chivalry, so I'll be done.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 2:20 pm
Oh I'll hold doors open for people. I don't mind men doing it for me sometimes as long as they don't say "ladies first" because I just tell them I don't believe in that rubbish, but thank them anyway. If it's just out of courtesy, fine, but if it's because I'm a woman I hate it.
I think the girl at that prom was being not only stupid but extremely childish. I feel sorry for the guy.
In some cases though, like a renaissance ball, it's quite nice to see the chivalrous demeanour in men, as long as it fits them and the women whom they are behaving that way to. I suppose it was the done thing in those days. I even have a character who's so much of a ladies man he's like that, but he'll only act that way to women who like it. If they show him they dislike it, he won't bother.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 9:23 am
Makes sense. There is no point using chivalry to impress a lady who is not impressed by it. Maybe that's when a guy could smash a beer can on his forehead. rolleyes He he, just kidding.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:46 am
SirKirbance Makes sense. There is no point using chivalry to impress a lady who is not impressed by it. Maybe that's when a guy could smash a beer can on his forehead. rolleyes He he, just kidding. Heh... Then I would just think he's stupid! xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 8:45 am
Lol! Those poll options are hilarious! mrgreen
I like it when my date hold the door open for me, or pulls the chair at a restaurant. But when I am not dating, I don't really care.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|