Welcome to Gaia! ::

This was a PM conversation between a person whom I do not wish to point out. Although I may have done wrong, I have also been wrongly accused. Read the conversation, and tell me whom you believe was right in this sort of situation:

******* wrote:
You are being sent this PM because you have spammed inthe RPOG's Bank Thread. Take note that this is only a warning and will only enter you into the bank's moderatoring panel. If further rules are broken, you will receive more warnings and it will eventually end up in being banned. Please take this into considersation as it could turn out negatively.

*********, RPOG Moderator.

xNancy-Lyx wrote:

Since I have been wrongly accused, I feel that I have the right to question your implyment. In which way have I been "spamming"? What have I committed to violate your rules? Then if so, if what ways could I properly correct myself, although I find there to be no wrong in my actions. So, may I voice my opinion of sheer disappointment in being critized for this act, or, shall I give you the opportunity to explain your reasons?

Please Govern Yourself Accordingly,
Nancy

********* wrote:

I don't have to explain myself. If you know the rules, you wouldn't have spammed. So, evidently, you don't know the rules. I suggest you go re-read them.

xNancy-Lyx wrote:

You are in fact correct for the most part. You do not have to explain youself; it is your solely your choice in doing so. Yet, in the contrast, you are wrong in your reason of accusing me of "spammig." Although your rules clearly point out no spamming such as sending meaningless message with emotions, the term which you are using to describe is inadequate. The definition of spamming: spam (n.) Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups; junk e-mail.
spam (v.) To send unsolicited e-mail to. In other words, it is accurately stating that spamming is the sending of foolish messages. Yet, it also implys mutiplication and repetition. You see, although my act committed was similar to "spamming", it did not measure up to all the expectations. I had only posted once, which is not repetitive or taking up your precious space. Also, I posted to encourage the strength of the thread. I had true intentions, but you did not hear my thoughts out, so, evidently, you were accusing me of something without enough proof. Furthermore, my emotion posted was neither neutral nor negative; it was a positive symbol expressing my agreement with this thread.

********* wrote:

You can use all of those words and defintions you want, babe. I don't give a rats ******** a** about it. You broke the forum rules and the thread rules. So, stop trying to be all "Omg, I technically didn't do it. Blahblahblah." Because I don't care. I never will care. Now just don't even reply and leave.

xNancy-Lyx wrote:

Ha, I find it very humerous that you have come to a stage of such indignity. A person with your vocabulary or intelligence, or so I assume since I do not proccess an adequate amount of background information on you to judge, I would not have believed you would have come to the stage of "swearing". Although swearing may leave an impact, it is usually very low terminology to be used to express one's anger. Also, this coming from a repected member of RPOG is quite a disappointment. You do realize you have given me the satisfaction of involving you in such a conversation to enrage you? Well, since you asked with such politeness and humble respect, I will end this conversation. Yet, bear this in mind: don't accuse others without an adequate amount of evidence in their wrong doing. In addition, swearing is low, no matter to who you are expressing it towards and for whatever reason.



-----------------------Note------------------------

Well, that was my story of injustice. Your opinion?

((Also, I'm not a n00b. I was recently reported for calling a n00b a dickweed because he wouldn't stop talking to me on Blackjack, and my ignore button wasn't working. For safe measure, I sent all my items to my mule account. Just wanted to make a sidenote there.))

What website is that? It sounds like the ACLU could help you out. You have a right to be able to promote whatever you want, you know?

It was on Gaia?! And you didn't say anything to the captain?! And was it in a guild, because that's against the TOS, what he said.

Why didn't you talk to the captain though? He would have renounced the guy's position!

Then why don't you tell the captain?

So? I haven't gotten an answer in my last three posts!

Hmmm... both of you have a somewhat ligitiment point. You, on the one hand have all the evidence you need to prove your technical inosence, but she, on the other hand has rule inforcement power, as such, she inforses the rule of no spaming and tho the by the dictionary defonition you where not spaming by the guild definition you could have been.

Oh, and when you want an answer you wait pashently, and dont repeat yourself unles its absalutly necisary. 3nodding