|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:39 pm
|
|
|
|
SterileNeedles Nethilia SterileNeedles Well ok then. You're just gonna have to deal with that one hospital that you don't like then or drive way out to somewhere else to get what you want. xP A woman should not be made to drive out of her way because the nearest hospital thinks that abortion and ECP is murder. Not to mention, not everyone can drive, has the money to drive that far, or is in an urban area that means going hundreds of miles out of her way to get health care because Catholics seem to think they have the right to make others follow their faith. Health care should not be based on the whims of a religion. In no other job is someone allowed to use their religion to not do a job whatsoever. If Catholic Hospitals want to deny birth control and contraception, fine. But they should not be allowed to be the only hospital in the area. As for the "hospitals aren't the only areas" situation--in many places, they are. Again, do not assume that people can easily access a Planned Parenthood or other clinic. In Only 13% of counties in the US have abortion services available. In Mississippi, there's ONE clinic that provides abortion, and they're trying to shut it down. There are thousands of women living there; they should not be made to drive to Louisiana or even further because some people think their faith overrides someone's rights. Sticking stumbling blocks in front of women seeking health services and saying "sucks to be you" is not pro-choice. It's classist, racist, and divisive. We've got enough "just suck it up and deal" assholes on the anti-choice side. I don't need them on my side too. Then do something about it! God! Don't sit around whining about how women can't get there contraceptives in certain rural areas because of whatever. I already gave an example of what choicers could do, which is band together and make a charity and get donations, give donations etc. to help build public hopsitals or private hospitals or whatever that offer contraceptives, I'm sure that there are many other things choicers could do as well to help. And as soon as I give a suggestion of what people could do to help out these women I get the 'buts'. "But they won't band together blah blah." So I figured fine then, if you're just going to sit around and whine about how women can't get their contraceptives and blame Christians for all the s**t going on and imply that you want to force a private hospital to go completely against their morals and give abortions to women then whatever. I'm just going to be passive about the subject. I see no reason to argue about it if you're all just going to whine and b***h about Christians and how they're ******** everything up. And don't give me that "Well pro-lifers will protest and stop us," "Their voices are louder than ours" bull-s**t because I've seen you guys in action and I have never seen you guys back down in the debate thread, so why would you ever back down in the real world? Abortion became legal thanks to the strong and loud voices of choicers in the 60s-70s. I'm sure we could be just as loud again and get together and demand that the government, or whoever, or do it ourselves and build these hosptials/abortion clinics/pharmacies/etc. and get these women their contraception that they need in their areas.
While I agree 100% with what Nethilia said... I also agree with your call to action. The truth is, we do need to start acting up. But it's easier said than done. That's why people speak their minds online. It's easy. If you're harassed there you can escape. It would be suicide for some of us to out ourselves as pro-choice. And even for those who wouldn't lose that much, it's really hard to be called a "baby killer" by people you would otherwise treat you decent.
But I agree. When we're silent, we're helping the other side. That's why the pro-lifers have been so successful. The pro-choice side thinks their rights are guaranteed, and we're often shamed into silence. That leaves it wide open for the anti-choice side--a radical minority-- to overpower our voices. Our shame, our silence, out complacency is their power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:47 pm
|
|
|
|
SterileNeedles PhaedraMcSpiffy Just as Nethilia said, sitting back and letting this happen is not pro-choice. So what are you doing to help fix this then? Argue about it on the Internet? In fact I am curious, I see a lot of people complain about this stuff on here, what have you all done to try and help fix these problems that you all have such an issue with?
This brings up another reason why I can't do much: I'm seventeen! I'm just starting out and wet behind the ears. I suppose I can go to marches and do volunteer work, but... I don't have a car or a license and I'm miles away from public transportation.
I like to think of myself as dormant right now, waiting until I can do something. Building up. But I've got a lot of stuff going on right now.
And I don't know what my career should be, but I'd like to help protect, educate people about and provide reproductive/sexual health services. I'm just not sure if I'm headed for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:23 pm
|
|
|
|
PhaedraMcSpiffy There is a demand for abortion services everywhere that it not being met. Look at the examples of Mississippi just stated. And think of South Dakota! There must be a demand there, and yet it is illegal for there to be a supply.
Hospitals don't offer abortion services. That's not even what we were talking about, we were talking about offering contraceptives.
PhaedraMcSpiffy Just as Nethilia said, sitting back and letting this happen is not pro-choice. Depriving somebody the right to choose what to do with their private property is anti-choice. Its that simple. You can't honestly believe that forcing somebody to comply with you is promoting choice...
PhaedraMcSpiffy Convenience is relative. And I really hope you aren't implying that women have abortions just for "convenience", because that's absurd and implies that women who have abortions have no moral standards. I'm sure women have used abortion "just for convenience", but that doesn't mean we all just go out and get them for the hell of it.
I was not even talking about abortion. This thread is not even about abortion. Why are you bringing abortion into it? The convenience that I was referencing is forcing hospitals to dispense contraceptives.
PhaedraMcSpiffy Here's my suggested revision to that analogy: A HOSPITAL whose policy is to have no maternity ward or services to help pregnant women deliver babies because they are against overpopulation or something. Or a hospital who refused to treat attempted suicides or people with illnesses caused by drugs, alchohol, or obesity because "it's their fault." Or something.
Alot of hopistals don't have maternity wards. There are all sorts of speciality hospitals. There are trauma centers, children's hospitals, geriatric hostpials and specialized surgical hospitals.
Hell, they even have hospitals that ONLY have maternity wards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:54 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:21 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:51 am
|
|
|
|
nobhdy PhaedraMcSpiffy There is a demand for abortion services everywhere that it not being met. Look at the examples of Mississippi just stated. And think of South Dakota! There must be a demand there, and yet it is illegal for there to be a supply. Hospitals don't offer abortion services. That's not even what we were talking about, we were talking about offering contraceptives.
....My bad.
But I'm sure some do offer abortions.
[qoute]PhaedraMcSpiffy Just as Nethilia said, sitting back and letting this happen is not pro-choice. Depriving somebody the right to choose what to do with their private property is anti-choice. Its that simple. You can't honestly believe that forcing somebody to comply with you is promoting choice...
They're a healthcare corporation! We have all sorts of laws that force companies to comply. They have to follow basic rules to qualify as a hospital or healthcare provider. You don't call those laws anti-choice. It's really not that extreme.
Quote: I was not even talking about abortion. This thread is not even about abortion. Why are you bringing abortion into it? The convenience that I was referencing is forcing hospitals to dispense contraceptives.
Still, you can't just say that contraceptives are just for convenience. "No contraceptives? Too bad, no sex for you!" is not a responsible or reasonable attitude for a medical facility to take.
Quote: PhaedraMcSpiffy Here's my suggested revision to that analogy: A HOSPITAL whose policy is to have no maternity ward or services to help pregnant women deliver babies because they are against overpopulation or something. Or a hospital who refused to treat attempted suicides or people with illnesses caused by drugs, alchohol, or obesity because "it's their fault." Or something. Alot of hopistals don't have maternity wards. There are all sorts of speciality hospitals. There are trauma centers, children's hospitals, geriatric hostpials and specialized surgical hospitals. Hell, they even have hospitals that ONLY have maternity wards.
If it's a SPECIALIZED hospital, that's fine. I'm not going to expect a podiatrist to give me birth control. I am, however, going to expect an OB/GYN or other specialist on reproductive/sexual health to give me birth control or AT LEAST accurate information on how I may get birth control elsewhere.
Healthcare Facilities do have choices as to what they will and won't offer. But it's not acceptable for them to deny people treatment for non-medical reasons.
Cutting off access to contraception is just going to make matters worse. Don't you understand that? To be in control of one's reproduction is a vital part of human health and human rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:58 am
|
|
|
|
SterileNeedles PhaedraMcSpiffy Just as Nethilia said, sitting back and letting this happen is not pro-choice. So what are you doing to help fix this then? Argue about it on the Internet? In fact I am curious, I see a lot of people complain about this stuff on here, what have you all done to try and help fix these problems that you all have such an issue with?
Funny, isn't it, how many of us who are "complaining" here are minors, and therefore are rather limited in what we can do offline? I mean, we have to go to school for 6+ hours a day, five days a week, not to mention extracurricular activities and homework. Also, many of us can't drive and/or lack a good public transportation system.
You cannot expect everyone who rants about problems in a guild designed to do just that to be able to do something great IRL. There are other ways of getting a message across other than protesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tragic Christmas Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:21 am
|
|
|
|
nobhdy Nethilia You made the assumption, you own up to the assumption when you get called on it instead of backpedaling. She is owning up to it. Since when is offering a rational explination for an opinion "backpedaling?" Did you read the last sentance of her most recent post? It expresses her initial concern AGAIN. She is owning up to it, and expressing where she is coming from at that.
SterileNeedles Well sorry. From the way you all complain about the Christians "OMG oh noes they're taking over!!!!!111one!1" "Aaahhh! The lifers won't let clinics be built" "They won't give me my contraception wahh!" You all make it sound like choicers are doing nothing to fix these problems. I mean honestly, if there are women being denied the medical care they need/want in certain areas why aren't choicers who are so concerned about it out there protesting? But if you are doing things and complaining at the same time, then go you. I just hate it when people complain and don't do anything about it. But I suppose that is a personal pet peeve of mine, I probably shouldn't have brought it up. So I'm sorry, I apologize for making suggestions to help fix these problems. You are entitled to whine and be prejudice against Christians, so please continue. I fail to see how aimlessly generalizing pro-choicers as a whole and waving around a persecution complex is somehow "owning up" to anything. If publically protesting against a crowd already known for violent and hostile behavior is the only thing she can come up with to counter a national problem, then she can kindly redeposit her "suggestions" back to where she pulled them from. Plenty of pro-choicers have educated people through spreading information and debating, which negates the notion that the internet is wholly useless for the pro-choice cause.
Quote: No need to so adamantly defend yourself, friend. You personally weren't even under attack in the first place. Seeing how "ALL" was used quite frequently in the post in question, I'd say she was very well under attack.
Quote: Please try to understand the issue. Alot of hospitals don't have birth control avaliable. Why? It isn't something hospitals traditionally do. Hospitals offer HEALTH CARE to people who have AILMENTS. Do you guys not know what a hospital is? Do you know what an ailment is? Believe it or not, there are instances where birth control pills and emergency contraceptives are needed to counter the impact of abnormal periods, broken condoms, or a rape. Hospitals are supposed to provide health care in all aspects, not just when a crazy runs you off the road or shoots you.
Quote: Now if you go to a OBGYN/Planned Parenthood/Pediatrition/General Practitioner you can get birth control/contraceptives. I did some research, and our local hospital here doesn't vend birth control. Know why? Because it is not the traditional role of hospitals. Now please, stop bickering. (for the record, our local hospital is run by a non-for-profit private owner, and not any church) What kind of hospital "vends" medication, but not birth control? Doctors don't dispense medication by themselves, not even OB/GYNs or general practitioners. It's called getting a prescription, something that's nearly impossible if there are no specialized women's health clinics around within a reasonable distance. If a Catholic hospital is the only source of health care in the area, they should be expected to provide a wide range of services, including prescribing birth control and stocking it if they have a built-in pharmacy. If they can't own up to their duties as pharmacists and doctors, they should not be called such, and the hospital in which they work should not be called a ******** hospital. The traditional role of a hospital to is to provide health care, not judge women based on arbitrary criteria and pathetic "I'm not going to do my job because I'm obeying my god" excuses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:56 pm
|
|
|
|
Tragic Christmas nobhdy Nethilia You made the assumption, you own up to the assumption when you get called on it instead of backpedaling. She is owning up to it. Since when is offering a rational explination for an opinion "backpedaling?" Did you read the last sentance of her most recent post? It expresses her initial concern AGAIN. She is owning up to it, and expressing where she is coming from at that. SterileNeedles Well sorry. From the way you all complain about the Christians "OMG oh noes they're taking over!!!!!111one!1" "Aaahhh! The lifers won't let clinics be built" "They won't give me my contraception wahh!" You all make it sound like choicers are doing nothing to fix these problems. I mean honestly, if there are women being denied the medical care they need/want in certain areas why aren't choicers who are so concerned about it out there protesting? But if you are doing things and complaining at the same time, then go you. I just hate it when people complain and don't do anything about it. But I suppose that is a personal pet peeve of mine, I probably shouldn't have brought it up. So I'm sorry, I apologize for making suggestions to help fix these problems. You are entitled to whine and be prejudice against Christians, so please continue. I fail to see how aimlessly generalizing pro-choicers as a whole and waving around a persecution complex is somehow "owning up" to anything. If publically protesting against a crowd already known for violent and hostile behavior is the only thing she can come up with to counter a national problem, then she can kindly redeposit her "suggestions" back to where she pulled them from. Plenty of pro-choicers have educated people through spreading information and debating, which negates the notion that the internet is wholly useless for the pro-choice cause.
I really just wanted to end this like a calm person. I don't know why you all are so inflamed. Could you all do me a favor and re-read her posts? She wants to help the cause, and to help preserve our rights to bodily integrity. She saw a problem within the community, and offered a solution. If you didn't think it was directly targeted toward you, then you probably think it was a rational idea. Now I'm going to leave this thread. I've said more than my two cents, and I keep being responded with by nonsensical rants.
Please. Owners of property can do whatever they want with that property so long as it doesn't hurt anybody else. Discussion over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tragic Christmas Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|