| Alin ang nauna? |
| Manok |
|
81% |
[ 18 ] |
| Itlog |
|
18% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:09 pm
alin ba talaga ang nauna? Manok o itlog?
anong sa tingin nyo? mrgreen
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:15 am
Nauna ang itlog.. Kasi nauna si Adan kay Eba.. rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:50 am
Mas nauna ang manok.
Let's explain it in a religious way with a zest of scientific explanation. biggrin biggrin
Yung manok ang nauna kasi yun ang nkasulat sa bibliya tsaka kung itlog yung nauna, there will be 0 AS IN "0%" rate of survival kasi walang ina na nagbibigay nito ng warmth at mataas din ang chance niyang makain ng iba't-ibang predator. Kaya I conclude na manok ang nauna.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:35 am
JACKAL17 Extreme Nauna ang itlog.. Kasi nauna si Adan kay Eba.. rofl Aahhaha GETS ko to ahhh! mrgreen mas nauna nga pala ang itlog kaysa sa monay noooh??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:44 pm
This question can be answered by the potency and actuality concepts of Aristotle.
It says that actuality is prior logically, temporally and substantially to potency:
- Act is logically prior to potency that which is "potential is potential because it is possible for it to become active." This means that the potency of a chicken is possible only because it can become a chicken.
-Further, act is temporally prior to potency for the reason that the potency of a chicken, while it is yet to be a chicken, is the result of an actual chicken.
-Furthermore, act is substantially prior to potency because those which are in actuality have already form. Thus, the chicken, for the sake of which the egg must be, has already the form chicken while the egg has still to acquire such form, since the egg has yet to be a chicken.
In short, nauna ang chicken. Wag na kayo makipagtalo kay Aristotle rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:37 pm
Bago pa man malikha si Adan at ang itlog niya,naunang likhain ng diyos ang mga hayop s tubig at lupa. Nakasaad na din s bibliya ang tungkol sa mga lumilipad na hayop...genesis 1:22...so nauna ang manok...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:28 am
Manok siyempre, based on the Bible diba wala namang sinabing "God created eggs". Haha. Tsaka except sa mundo, una he created animals, meaning nauna ang manok sa egg because we consider Manok as one of the animals diba. smile
Tsaka paano naman mabubuhay yung itlog kung walang mag wawarm sa kanila alangan naman daganan yung ni Eba o Adan edi nabasag yun. haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:55 pm
hahahahhaa. natatawa ako sa mga sagot. may kalokohan tas may super intelligent answer naman rofl rofl
pero para saken...ano uhm..itlog. parang ung sa bamboo myth kung san lumabas ung dalawang tao rofl rofl
parang rin ung sa cosmig egg sa chinese mythology. galing si pan-gu sa isang cosmic egg. rofl rofl
kaya... ITAAS ANG BANDILA NG ITLOOOOOOG~!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:07 am
MANOK :O!!!!!!!!!!!!! scream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:10 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 am
Ang Religious ng mga tao dito!?!?!?!
Why do you actually believe in bible when one just wrote it? Well, I "do" believe in God but it doesn't mean you have to be super religious!=_= Look the belief is a religious thing.. Do you actually think that it is true?? It's just a superstitious!
Well, this is a cycle of animals....But to pick in egg and chicken... I pick egg!! Because there won't be a chicken without an egg! And nobody can answer this question!<.< It's just our logic that will answer it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:45 am
itlog....
Reasons
#1 Alphabetical arrangement blaugh
#2 Kung nauna ang inahing manok, pano cya mangingitlog kung wala namang Tandang na nageexist nung nabuhay cya?? Pano magkakasisiw ang inahing manok kung walang semilya ang itlog nya... rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:43 am
NetBreak_01 itlog.... Reasons #1 Alphabetical arrangement blaugh #2 Kung nauna ang inahing manok, pano cya mangingitlog kung wala namang Tandang na nageexist nung nabuhay cya?? Pano magkakasisiw ang inahing manok kung walang semilya ang itlog nya... rolleyes Some statements of evolution can answer this and yeah, maari paring mangitlog ang hen kahit walang rooster, and it is through environmetal adaptment, tsaka dbuh nung ginawa ang mundo, lahat may pares except for man? So automatically, may rooster na ang hen noon blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:45 am
limlizette Ang Religious ng mga tao dito!?!?!?! Why do you actually believe in bible when one just wrote it? Well, I "do" believe in God but it doesn't mean you have to be super religious!=_= Look the belief is a religious thing.. Do you actually think that it is true?? It's just a superstitious! Well, this is a cycle of animals....But to pick in egg and chicken... I pick egg!! Because there won't be a chicken without an egg! And nobody can answer this question!<.< It's just our logic that will answer it! Chickens are rumored to be descendants of flying dinosaurs and not of eggs. Ok now? I did not answer you in a religious manner already wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
