| Ian is... |
| Innocent!! -nods furiously- |
|
82% |
[ 19 ] |
| Guilty!! D:< |
|
17% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:09 pm
He's being accused of arson! -gaspeth- Opinions? Comments? How are you going to vote?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:10 pm
Ian's innocnet!
I musht have my IAN!!! X3
If not, I may suddenly become a mass murderer 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Well I can see where Ian can be guilty but he doesn't quite seem the sort in my opinion. I'd say he's innocent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:36 pm
I think it's unfair Ian get's a crappy lawyer, and the other one is really goood. D" That's showing that Ian's innocent but they're trying their hardest to convince us otherwise. After all, he had found something out about Gino, that I think Gino had to stop him some how.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melodious Conversationalist
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:15 am
I think he's innocent. Bucho is up to something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:04 pm
Well, they have a solid case against Ian on opportunity; he was there, and he was in a restricted area. Caught on film. So, that part is pretty solid.
The motive, they've got a decent motive; revenge. For the buisness and for Sasha.
But, there's little hard evidence that he actually did it.
Also, think of how many people were at the mansion; the entire population of Gaia, more or less. Thousands, perhaps millions of people. And I'm fairly sure most of them went into restricted areas; I believe that I myself might have done so.
Also, the trial, and past events, seem to cast doubts upon Bucho's competence.
So, I believe that there is more than sufficent doubt, and a definite lack of evidence.
Ian is innocent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melodious Conversationalist
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:25 pm
 Also, has anyone considered the fact that Rufus was nowhere near him? We all know that Rufus is EVERYWHERE Ian is. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:04 pm
No pets in the courthouse? Poor Ian, poor Rufus...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:12 pm
You just need to look at him. Ian is waaaay to much of a dork to have started the fire. *nod nod*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:49 pm
Kari Otogi No pets in the courthouse? Poor Ian, poor Rufus... Uh, two things. Rufus was a witness in the courthouse, and Rufus was managing the store at that time, was he not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:44 pm
-  - <3 Innocent. Ian is not capable of such a thing. Bucho seems very suspicious though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:10 pm
well... I'll vote whatever, as long as someone dies I'm very happy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:55 pm
Haven't seen enough cogent evidence, innocent.
BUT GORE WOULD BE GOOD. How about a riot?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:40 pm
HereticX Kari Otogi No pets in the courthouse? Poor Ian, poor Rufus... Uh, two things. Rufus was a witness in the courthouse, and Rufus was managing the store at that time, was he not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 5:26 pm
'ho my..
It's somewhat surprising if it's in Rufus' case. I mean, if you look at it in a way, why would anyone suspect a cat doing such things? He's looked innocent by far longer than ANYONE else in the whole entire drama. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
