|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:13 pm
|
|
|
|
Kazydi Zahwomen So "rate is low = shouldn't even be considered"? My best friend's aunt was raped, and her rapist impregnated her. When her doctor refused to preform an abortion she killed herself, in the note she said that the thing inside of her was a monster. Do you have any idea of how traumatizing carry the child of your rapist would be? I wasn't talking about the rape part, I was talking about the baby killing the mother part. Same here, I should have made that more apparent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:00 pm
|
|
|
|
Zahwomen divineseraph Feti are human beings. By biological definition they are of the human species, and due to the difference in DNA, they are a separate entity. As such, killing them is wrong. It is no more an invasion of rights and privacy than laws against murder. Nobody has the right to kill, especially if the life in question was literally placed into existence by the one who would want it dead. coughrapevictimscough
There are obvious exceptions. However, a fallacy I notice is the constant fallback on abortion for medical complications and rape victims. This is such a tiny percentage, it barely applies to the subject at hand. Over 90% of abortions are done with little to no medical risk of carrying the child and not in a situation of rape.
Meaning, sure, I'll grant you rape. The other 1.3 million a year are inexcusable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:04 pm
|
|
|
|
divineseraph Zahwomen divineseraph Feti are human beings. By biological definition they are of the human species, and due to the difference in DNA, they are a separate entity. As such, killing them is wrong. It is no more an invasion of rights and privacy than laws against murder. Nobody has the right to kill, especially if the life in question was literally placed into existence by the one who would want it dead. coughrapevictimscough There are obvious exceptions. However, a fallacy I notice is the constant fallback on abortion for medical complications and rape victims. This is such a tiny percentage, it barely applies to the subject at hand. Over 90% of abortions are done with little to no medical risk of carrying the child and not in a situation of rape. Meaning, sure, I'll grant you rape. The other 1.3 million a year are inexcusable.
Tell that to Kazydi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:29 pm
|
|
|
|
Zahwomen divineseraph Zahwomen divineseraph Feti are human beings. By biological definition they are of the human species, and due to the difference in DNA, they are a separate entity. As such, killing them is wrong. It is no more an invasion of rights and privacy than laws against murder. Nobody has the right to kill, especially if the life in question was literally placed into existence by the one who would want it dead. coughrapevictimscough There are obvious exceptions. However, a fallacy I notice is the constant fallback on abortion for medical complications and rape victims. This is such a tiny percentage, it barely applies to the subject at hand. Over 90% of abortions are done with little to no medical risk of carrying the child and not in a situation of rape. Meaning, sure, I'll grant you rape. The other 1.3 million a year are inexcusable. Tell that to Kazydi.
Look. I'm just just going to say flat-out how I feel about this. I THINK ABORTION IS WRONG.
BUT
even though, I don't agree with it overall, I can stay out of it when it comes to a SERIOUS health risk. I believe that IN NO WAY should abortion be used any form of birth control. A child is a possible consequence of sex, and if you aren't prepared to deal with the consequences, then you aren't ready for sex.
But of course, people want to do whatever they want to do. They want to have their way, even if it means killing their own child to do it. There are many non-abortion alternative. Abortion should never be high on the list of available options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:15 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:26 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:06 am
|
|
|
|
I think that it's a pretty impossible subject. Moreso, it's impossible to determine whether it should be legal or not. Make it illegal, and it's unfair to the women who really have no other choice. i.e., rape, disfigured/damaged/etc. fetus, dangerous for the mother, all that fun stuff. Make it legal, and it's unfair to the other side, because then there are girls who are going to use it as birth control, and THAT is wrong.
I can understand, though, if you made one mistake and you don't want or can't have a baby, and you can't go through with carrying out the pregnancy. But make that mistake again, and that's your own fault.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:15 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:19 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:42 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|