|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:53 pm
professorB The reason we're not getting involved in Darfur is simply because it is not profitable. Unlike the Middle East, Africa has few valuable resources. It's certainly wrong to just sit and let it happen, but unfortunately, the U.N. is a selfish institution. the U.N has been trying for years but sudan hasent been letting them
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:20 am
thenerdqueen But back to Darfur - how can the genocide be stopped without causing another Cold War? well we could go with my friend Riley's view. which to be clear I do NOT support... "well... we could nuke the **** outta them"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:42 am
Jungle Soldier thenerdqueen But back to Darfur - how can the genocide be stopped without causing another Cold War? well we could go with my friend Riley's view. which to be clear I do NOT support... "well... we could nuke the **** outta them" So it would be pointless to argue about the stupidity of killing people to stop a genocide?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:00 am
Well, after killing enough nazis and eventauly Hitler,thier genocide stopped.
Though, that is completely unrelated to this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:03 pm
Hitler comitted suicide.
But why can't a third pary ask both Russia and the United States to stop supporting Darfur's genocide, by cutting of their trade indefinitely?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:50 am
thenerdqueen Hitler comitted suicide. But why can't a third pary ask both Russia and the United States to stop supporting Darfur's genocide, by cutting of their trade indefinitely? the United states dosent support it. Its Russia and China that support it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:04 am
James628 professorB The reason we're not getting involved in Darfur is simply because it is not profitable. Unlike the Middle East, Africa has few valuable resources. It's certainly wrong to just sit and let it happen, but unfortunately, the U.N. is a selfish institution. the U.N has been trying for years but sudan hasent been letting them How is Sudan stopping them? If the U.N. really wanted to get involved they would.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:54 am
professorB James628 professorB The reason we're not getting involved in Darfur is simply because it is not profitable. Unlike the Middle East, Africa has few valuable resources. It's certainly wrong to just sit and let it happen, but unfortunately, the U.N. is a selfish institution. the U.N has been trying for years but sudan hasent been letting them How is Sudan stopping them? If the U.N. really wanted to get involved they would. sudan says any peace troops will be seen as an act of war and the u.n wants to end the fighting not make it worse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:01 pm
James628 thenerdqueen Hitler comitted suicide. But why can't a third pary ask both Russia and the United States to stop supporting Darfur's genocide, by cutting of their trade indefinitely? the United states dosent support it. Its Russia and China that support it. Yeah, the Communists. did any singler person in Sudan ever exclaim "I hate America!"? If they did, That's the reason Russia is helping them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:11 pm
James628 professorB James628 professorB The reason we're not getting involved in Darfur is simply because it is not profitable. Unlike the Middle East, Africa has few valuable resources. It's certainly wrong to just sit and let it happen, but unfortunately, the U.N. is a selfish institution. the U.N has been trying for years but sudan hasent been letting them How is Sudan stopping them? If the U.N. really wanted to get involved they would. sudan says any peace troops will be seen as an act of war and the u.n wants to end the fighting not make it worse Yes, but who in Sudan is saying this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:24 pm
professorB James628 professorB James628 professorB The reason we're not getting involved in Darfur is simply because it is not profitable. Unlike the Middle East, Africa has few valuable resources. It's certainly wrong to just sit and let it happen, but unfortunately, the U.N. is a selfish institution. the U.N has been trying for years but sudan hasent been letting them How is Sudan stopping them? If the U.N. really wanted to get involved they would. sudan says any peace troops will be seen as an act of war and the u.n wants to end the fighting not make it worse Yes, but who in Sudan is saying this? there goverment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:39 am
thenerdqueen Hitler comitted suicide. But why can't a third pary ask both Russia and the United States to stop supporting Darfur's genocide, by cutting of their trade indefinitely? It is known, that Hitler ended up with a bullet in his brain, but it is not proven if he got shot or commited suicide. But I am getting off topic. I could take two stating points: "Why should there ever be troops to stop that killing? Sudan has no really valuable resources. Also a good war also provides good money from the black market." But, fortunately I am not such an a*****e, to seriously state this point. I think it'd be better to send troops in there, mainly acting on defensive and diplomatic ways. Also they shouldn't just do a come and go job, like defeating the evil and then go. They should be kept there for a longer time, to stabilize security and give them the acknowledgements of technics, to provide a better selfsupply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:13 pm
James628 professorB James628 professorB James628 professorB The reason we're not getting involved in Darfur is simply because it is not profitable. Unlike the Middle East, Africa has few valuable resources. It's certainly wrong to just sit and let it happen, but unfortunately, the U.N. is a selfish institution. the U.N has been trying for years but sudan hasent been letting them How is Sudan stopping them? If the U.N. really wanted to get involved they would. sudan says any peace troops will be seen as an act of war and the u.n wants to end the fighting not make it worse Yes, but who in Sudan is saying this? there goverment Wait a minute, who are the bad guys here? Sudan's government has done next to nothing in terms of alleviating the Darfur conflict. In fact, it's been speculated that they have been assisting the Janjaweed. As far as I'm concerned, Sudan's government is a serious threat to it's own country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:18 pm
professorB James628 professorB James628 professorB How is Sudan stopping them? If the U.N. really wanted to get involved they would. sudan says any peace troops will be seen as an act of war and the u.n wants to end the fighting not make it worse Yes, but who in Sudan is saying this? there goverment Wait a minute, who are the bad guys here? Sudan's government has done next to nothing in terms of alleviating the Darfur conflict. In fact, it's been speculated that they have been assisting the Janjaweed. As far as I'm concerned, Sudan's government is a serious threat to it's own country. they have been assisting the janjaweed by giving weapons and millitary assistance, there govermant is run by arabs and the people in darfur are african so the only help there getting is from the neighboring countries of chad and centrel africa, there govermant is only makong things worse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
