|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 4:50 am
Has anyone got that pic of her naked on the Rolling Stones cover?
My friend doesn't believe me she's beautiful even naked.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:35 pm
Never heard of Beth Ditto. Sorry.... Have you tried googling it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:23 pm
Oh, I had that picture...but since I thought it was on the Rolling Stones I didn't share it sweatdrop
There's also this pic:
(I'm probably gonna take it off my photobucket sometime in the near future, though)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:21 pm
The Dread Pirate Ghosty Oh, I had that picture...but since I thought it was on the Rolling Stones I didn't share it sweatdrop
There's also this pic:
(I'm probably gonna take it off my photobucket sometime in the near future, though)
Either they edited that or she lost alot of weight smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:33 pm
I think they edited it, although she's leaning back more in the first cover and in the second cover she's leaning forward more.
Edit: Or maybe it is just a ton of editing >>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:47 pm
The Dread Pirate Ghosty I think they edited it, although she's leaning back more in the first cover and in the second cover she's leaning forward more.
Edit: Or maybe it is just a ton of editing >>; I think it's edited a bit. Which is stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:57 pm
it might be the angle she was shot at too.
some people tend to look a bit different when shot at different angles.
i couldnt find that rolling stone pic to save my life too! XP
i didnt know she was a lesbian.....unless im mistaken.XP
both pics are pretty edited up too. neutral
WAIT!!!
theres the reason for her looking skinnier.
the NME cover is just in the last year.
the lesbian magazine cover (her head obscures the last part so i cant make out the whole name) was taken in 03.
shes gained weight. not to mention her hair has changed drastically. i prefer the 03 cover myself. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:09 pm
pawntakesknight it might be the angle she was shot at too. some people tend to look a bit different when shot at different angles. i couldnt find that rolling stone pic to save my life too! XP i didnt know she was a lesbian.....unless im mistaken.XP both pics are pretty edited up too. neutral WAIT!!!theres the reason for her looking skinnier. the NME cover is just in the last year. the lesbian magazine cover (her head obscures the last part so i cant make out the whole name) was taken in 03. shes gained weight. not to mention her hair has changed drastically. i prefer the 03 cover myself. 3nodding
She's dating a transsexual (or is it transgender? I don't get all these terms crying ), or she was at the time. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:55 pm
Her hair is awesome in 03/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
