|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:55 pm
La Veuve Zin Quote: Until you make a readily-available contraception that's free, has no negative effects, and is completely failproof, I will continue to exercise my right to remove unwanted persons from my uterus. Thus, abortions are not a thing of the past. Hell, you don't need abstinence, even. It's called oral sex. And frankly, if you're not satisfied with that...that's your problem. Even immature little boys I've met who were like "waaaahh!! I want p***y!!! crying " had to agree that they'd rather get a b*****b and not be a daddy than the alternative. Even if I would get an abortion if I got pregnant, I'd make the guy pay for it. I mean, these people claim abortions aren't fun. So...if you don't want to have to have one, and you don't want to have a baby, there's only one way to guarantee this: no vaginal sex. Sorry, legal abortion doesn't solve the problem of unwanted pregnancy--you still got pregnant--and life isn't fair. If I want to guarantee that I never die in a skydiving accident, I'll just have to never go skydiving. That's not fair, it's obviously a skydiver-hating conspiracy and I'm going to go whine about it in the ED. wahmbulance Splash pregnancy! The tiny drop of sperm that survives at least three different bacteria-filled oriface exchanges is also going to make the journey that a full load often fails to complete!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:36 am
Quote: NOTE: RU-486 is not an abortion pill, it PREVENTS conception. Can't abort without a pregnancy to abort. Please study what the ******** you're debating before trying to make mention of incorrect information. Sweet, sweet, irony. I should put it in my sig.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:27 pm
La Veuve Zin Quote: NOTE: RU-486 is not an abortion pill, it PREVENTS conception. Can't abort without a pregnancy to abort. Please study what the ******** you're debating before trying to make mention of incorrect information. Sweet, sweet, irony. I should put it in my sig. Was that when he yelled at you or me? Cause he said the same thing to me (I don't remember him using the F word that that makes his argument even weaker). What I don't really get is the whole "my body, my choice" argument. Last time I checked, the fetus was a whold different human being, it's just temporarily inside her uterus and depends on her to live. So are they claiming the fetus as part of her body? Hmmm....Also lot of them seem to miss points I made or ignore them completely. Like when I said that the placenta is attach to the uterine wall and that is expelled after the baby as "after birth" (also said it was temporary), they said that I missed the point and go "it is attached but a separate organ". Well I pretty sure I made it clear that is was a separate organ but just attached. I'm pretty sure I didn't say that the uterus follows along with the placenta. rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:45 pm
La Veuve Zin Quote: NOTE: RU-486 is not an abortion pill, it PREVENTS conception. Can't abort without a pregnancy to abort. Please study what the ******** you're debating before trying to make mention of incorrect information. Sweet, sweet, irony. I should put it in my sig. You should put it in your sig. RU-486 isn't FDA approved as EC to my knowledge, and wasn't brought to this country for that reason. There is something about that conversation that confuses me, however. Everyone's acting like mifepristone is used as EC, but from what I can find, it's only being studied as EC and tested as EC, not marketed or currently prescribed as EC. What's the deal with this one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:00 pm
lymelady La Veuve Zin Quote: NOTE: RU-486 is not an abortion pill, it PREVENTS conception. Can't abort without a pregnancy to abort. Please study what the ******** you're debating before trying to make mention of incorrect information. Sweet, sweet, irony. I should put it in my sig. You should put it in your sig. RU-486 isn't FDA approved as EC to my knowledge, and wasn't brought to this country for that reason. There is something about that conversation that confuses me, however. Everyone's acting like mifepristone is used as EC, but from what I can find, it's only being studied as EC and tested as EC, not marketed or currently prescribed as EC. What's the deal with this one? I don't know where alot of people get their info. I looked it up just to make sure and so far everyone says that it isn't used to prevent pregnancies, but to end them. So it's hasn't been offically used as EC (just tests). I noticed that assumptions are used alot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:24 pm
Sachiko, you're obviously too naive to realize that facts aren't true unless they have the Pro-Choice stamp of approval! Go become indoctrinated in mindless sheepdom, stop researching for yourself because doctors and scientists are not nearly as trustworthy as pro-abortion political propaganda.
Honestly.
(I just love that you're supposedly naive for not falling into a huge slippery slope xd that thing looked like fun to ride an innertube down.)
In some countries it may be used as EC, but not the US as far as I can tell. Hope they're using the lower doses wherever they're doing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:47 pm
Yes, I'm sorry. I should stop doing research and listing to what doctors say and just listen and believe what random people on the net says.
After all, they obvious know more about it then medical sites, medical books, scientist and doctors.
(Ah I wish it was like a innertube ride, that would be fun).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
