Welcome to Gaia! ::

Science and Beyond- The Science Guild

Back to Guilds

A guild where you come to share ideas or get help on anything science related! 

Tags: science, fiction, help, share, discuss 

Reply Astronomy
Astronomy 101: The Official Thread Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Do you have an idea of what a black hole is?
  Yes.
  No.
View Results

VoijaRisa

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:22 pm


Jubillie
On another note, did anyone hear of that recent Supernova?
I breifly read of it, and how it might be a huge new type of explosion.

What's so improtant about that though?
It's important in many ways.

First off, we can't watch stars evolve over billions of years, so it's somewhat hard to test models of how stars work. When they blow up, their insides get blown out, and it helps us figure things out.

Second (and related) theory says that stars shouldn't be able to exist more than about 20-40 times the mass of the sun. Yet every great once in awhile, we find one. Eta Carinae is an example at about 120 times the mass of the sun. Right now, we don't have any clue what's going on. Looking at events like these, which must be caused by exceptionally massive stars, help us get a better picture.

Supernovae are also important because they are the key generators of all elements heavier than iron in the entire universe. That's not really useful for scientific investigation, but it's prety important for life to get started. wink
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 9:23 pm


Another interesting thing is we get a massive surge in neutrinos when a Supernova happens. They are uncharged leptons so they are really hard to detect (smaller than an electron but no charge so they hardly ever react with anything making them really hard to detect you basically need a huge number of relativly high energy ones passing through the earth and then you get a chance one will set off a detector). Because there is so much we don't know about them any chance to detect a whole bunch is useful plus because of their low mass and origins (in the supernova) we know a lot (the type of reactions that caused them) and we know where they came from the supernova, and then we can do stuff like compare the how long they take to arrive compared to the light from the supernova (for a long time people were not really sure if neutrinos had mass or not, some that were detected during a previous super nova where slightly slowing than light in line with what relativity would predect (they only came in a few seconds behind the light which means they were going really really fast). So it gives us insight into an interesting particle (which is important to astronomy because it is one of the canidates for contributing to dark matter) and certain aspects of nuclear physics, relativity, ect.


Also some supernovas (type Ia) happen almost exactly the same way every time. Thus they have the same luminosity when they occur and are thus used as one of the methods of determining the distance of really distant galaxies.(basically they look at changes in luminosity of the galaxy, and if they can tell it is a type Ia supernova they can determine the distance of the galaxy based off the absolute luminosity of the supernova)

info on supernovas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_supernova
(no I don't always just go to wikipedia, but is just normally the best and most clear option, especially if you don't want to get to technical)

Jad-Hoven


VoijaRisa

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 1:42 pm


Looking at the arrival time of the neutrinos compared to visible light doesn't tell us a whole lot. The supernova happens in the core, and the neutrinos can immediately escape since they barely interact with the envelope of the star, whereas the photons generated will have to work their way out over a longer period.

Incidentally, neutrinos have only ever been detected from one supernova: 1987a. And even then, only 10 of them even though 90% of the energy of a supernova is carried away by neutrinos. All were detected to arrive before the peak brightness of the supernova.
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:46 pm


VoijaRisa
Looking at the arrival time of the neutrinos compared to visible light doesn't tell us a whole lot. The supernova happens in the core, and the neutrinos can immediately escape since they barely interact with the envelope of the star, whereas the photons generated will have to work their way out over a longer period.

Incidentally, neutrinos have only ever been detected from one supernova: 1987a. And even then, only 10 of them even though 90% of the energy of a supernova is carried away by neutrinos. All were detected to arrive before the peak brightness of the supernova.


Well the data gathered from that supernova (both neutrinos, and visible light) were used for the calculatin of the mass of a neutrino (before this it was a basially open question rather neutrinos actually had mass). So providing proof that neutrinos had mass told us a lot about particle physics.

Jad-Hoven


Sora1029

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:20 pm


Random ideas: 1: The theroy of warp drive is the condencing of space in front of you and the stretching of space behind you so space can do the moving for you. So this theroy intends to say that with this technology can allow you to move faster than the speed of light without moving. 2: The theroy of worm holls only exists because it doesen't violate any of the laws of the theroy of Relitivity.
Reply
Astronomy

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum