|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:48 pm
Makes sense now. xd
Dear Lex,
I'm so sorry
but I can't go
through with this
mad
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:51 pm
clueless-in-the-forest *remembers the glory days of clana* crying
-Pats shoulder-
There will be more... mrgreen
@ Lana- Lana is one confused individual. Maybe she should check into Bellreeve some time xD. Though when I think about it, I doubt it will really help...><
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:11 pm
SaberFireTiger Yeah a sorry drug pusher. Ha, sorry, had a mean girls flashback. But actually, Lana was on that killing/bring you back drug and Clark seems to be on red k a lot. If only Lois waited a couple of weeks before putting on that lipstick, then Lana would be with Clark. Oh well! You know what I love about Crimson? The fact that although Lana's aware that Clark's "on something", she really doesn't seem to care after that one scene. She never confronts him about it later, either. What? Did she just not want to look like a hypocrite? What is the deal with that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:20 pm
I noticed that too. In the past Red K experiences Clark has always been confronted... not this time though... I guess maybe everyone thought that Clark would "crack" at one point or another....so it wasn't that big of a surprise....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:23 pm
Not to mention all of Clark's friends thought he had "issues" whenever he was on red k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:47 pm
Yeah, they mostly thought he was on drugs...or super horny... xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:50 pm
"You can't have it both ways Clark. It either was you or it wasn't," Lana said wisely in season 2.
"He's on something and he wants us to react, please don't." *reacts by passionately making out with red k induced ex boyfriend*
"Don't listen to him, he's on something!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:44 pm
ah... the hypocritical sounds of Lana Lang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:54 pm
Was 2 minutes that much of a change?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:56 pm
SaberFireTiger Was 2 minutes that much of a change? I was talking about the first comment. The second one was in crimson?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:02 pm
Yeah I know but that kind of thing shouldn't change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:47 am
The second one was just skanky of her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
