|
|
| Sequel? |
| yay! |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
| NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! |
|
92% |
[ 13 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:38 pm
Sine we see how Anti Raoul ALW is, I am predicting the play will go like this:
Christine feels bad for Erik, so she leaves Raoul to go back to him. Raoul gets amd and goes to put a bullet into Erik's brain, but he accidentally shoots Christine, because that's what Webber wants.
So, discuss:
Sequel?
Plot Predictions
and whatever else you find relevant.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:09 pm
It is difficult to predict, but I think that Christine will leave Raoul, and go back to the Opera House. She will not love Erik, but I think that they will come to some sort of understanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:20 pm
Ghostly Phantomess It is difficult to predict, but I think that Christine will leave Raoul, and go back to the Opera House. She will not love Erik, but I think that they will come to some sort of understanding. Yeah, that's probably what would happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:33 pm
Well since the sequal is going to be off on Phantom of Manhatten which was written as a sequal to the musical anyway, I see it more like the entire thing is Erik luring Christine back once he knows they had a son together and that idiot Darius, Erik's creepy ward/worker boy, trying to dash the plans to hell for greed.
And the way PoM is written, Raoul doesn't show up at all until just about the very end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:43 pm
Utakan Well since the sequal is going to be off on Phantom of Manhatten which was written as a sequal to the musical anyway, I see it more like the entire thing is Erik luring Christine back once he knows they had a son together and that idiot Darius, Erik's creepy ward/worker boy, trying to dash the plans to hell for greed. And the way PoM is written, Raoul doesn't show up at all until just about the very end. Wake Me Up....
Sounds like that's exactly what's going to happen! 3nodding
Before You Go-Go
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:30 pm
Why? sweet Goddess why? The singing in the movie Phantom was a lamentable mess. Gerard did't have the range for the Phantom and Emily didn't have the support. I walked out the theatre. I have been training to be an opera singer for two years now and I still can't watch that movie. They completely futsed up my musical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:26 am
Starbranded Why? sweet Goddess why? The singing in the movie Phantom was a lamentable mess. Gerard did't have the range for the Phantom and Emily didn't have the support. I walked out the theatre. I have been training to be an opera singer for two years now and I still can't watch that movie. They completely futsed up my musical. FINALLY!!! somebody understands what I have been saying about the movie. I completely agree, they screwed up the musical and the actors were not right for the roles. They were mediocre, but for a musical like that, you do need to have people that have been trained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:10 am
Ghostly Phantomess Starbranded Why? sweet Goddess why? The singing in the movie Phantom was a lamentable mess. Gerard did't have the range for the Phantom and Emily didn't have the support. I walked out the theatre. I have been training to be an opera singer for two years now and I still can't watch that movie. They completely futsed up my musical. FINALLY!!! somebody understands what I have been saying about the movie. I completely agree, they screwed up the musical and the actors were not right for the roles. They were mediocre, but for a musical like that, you do need to have people that have been trained. Thank you! I grew up listening to Sarah Brightman and Michael Crawford. I simply cannot abide anything less than that standard. Hell, the musical was written for Sarah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:28 pm
Starbranded Ghostly Phantomess Starbranded Why? sweet Goddess why? The singing in the movie Phantom was a lamentable mess. Gerard did't have the range for the Phantom and Emily didn't have the support. I walked out the theatre. I have been training to be an opera singer for two years now and I still can't watch that movie. They completely futsed up my musical. FINALLY!!! somebody understands what I have been saying about the movie. I completely agree, they screwed up the musical and the actors were not right for the roles. They were mediocre, but for a musical like that, you do need to have people that have been trained. Thank you! I grew up listening to Sarah Brightman and Michael Crawford. I simply cannot abide anything less than that standard. Hell, the musical was written for Sarah. Oh gods! Thank you for pointing that out! (This is BevinKB by the way.) If I had to change ONE friggin' thing about the 2004 Phantom movie, I'd replace Gerard Butler with Michael Crawford and all will be good for me! *gasms by the thought*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:07 am
PhantomessErika Starbranded Ghostly Phantomess Starbranded Why? sweet Goddess why? The singing in the movie Phantom was a lamentable mess. Gerard did't have the range for the Phantom and Emily didn't have the support. I walked out the theatre. I have been training to be an opera singer for two years now and I still can't watch that movie. They completely futsed up my musical. FINALLY!!! somebody understands what I have been saying about the movie. I completely agree, they screwed up the musical and the actors were not right for the roles. They were mediocre, but for a musical like that, you do need to have people that have been trained. Thank you! I grew up listening to Sarah Brightman and Michael Crawford. I simply cannot abide anything less than that standard. Hell, the musical was written for Sarah. Oh gods! Thank you for pointing that out! (This is BevinKB by the way.) If I had to change ONE friggin' thing about the 2004 Phantom movie, I'd replace Gerard Butler with Michael Crawford and all will be good for me! *gasms by the thought* O goddess. Can you imagine how much more of a hit it would have been if they had that god in it? I just got chills imagining that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:36 am
Starbranded PhantomessErika Starbranded Ghostly Phantomess Starbranded Why? sweet Goddess why? The singing in the movie Phantom was a lamentable mess. Gerard did't have the range for the Phantom and Emily didn't have the support. I walked out the theatre. I have been training to be an opera singer for two years now and I still can't watch that movie. They completely futsed up my musical. FINALLY!!! somebody understands what I have been saying about the movie. I completely agree, they screwed up the musical and the actors were not right for the roles. They were mediocre, but for a musical like that, you do need to have people that have been trained. Thank you! I grew up listening to Sarah Brightman and Michael Crawford. I simply cannot abide anything less than that standard. Hell, the musical was written for Sarah. Oh gods! Thank you for pointing that out! (This is BevinKB by the way.) If I had to change ONE friggin' thing about the 2004 Phantom movie, I'd replace Gerard Butler with Michael Crawford and all will be good for me! *gasms by the thought* O goddess. Can you imagine how much more of a hit it would have been if they had that god in it? I just got chills imagining that. Well aside from Crawford being about in his 60's... confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:29 pm
Utakan Well aside from Crawford being about in his 60's... confused He's still a God in our book. And being such a physical actor, he could still do Phantom in his current age and still be the greatest Phantom that has ever graced our genrations. surprised Sir Crawford's voice is beyond divine and heavenly. (and since it's St. Patrick's Day, i have a bit of a theory that Michael is Irish.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:41 pm
PhantomessErika Utakan Well aside from Crawford being about in his 60's... confused He's still a God in our book. And being such a physical actor, he could still do Phantom in his current age and still be the greatest Phantom that has ever graced our genrations. surprised Sir Crawford's voice is beyond divine and heavenly. (and since it's St. Patrick's Day, i have a bit of a theory that Michael is Irish.) I don't care that he is old. He is the all hallowed Phantom. The one whose voice turns me to goo. He could be 80 and I would still want him to sing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:12 pm
Starbranded PhantomessErika Utakan Well aside from Crawford being about in his 60's... confused He's still a God in our book. And being such a physical actor, he could still do Phantom in his current age and still be the greatest Phantom that has ever graced our genrations. surprised Sir Crawford's voice is beyond divine and heavenly. (and since it's St. Patrick's Day, i have a bit of a theory that Michael is Irish.) I don't care that he is old. He is the all hallowed Phantom. The one whose voice turns me to goo. He could be 80 and I would still want him to sing. Voices diminish over time, so I doubt when he's 80 he could sing like when he first started the show in the 80's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:25 pm
Sorry guys, I made an official thread for Sequal discussion. ^_^ Just carry it over there, k?
heart Utakan,
Co-Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
