|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:48 pm
Yeaaah! *runs around throwing flyers that say 'prevent prevention'*
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Captain Skimbleshanks Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
glamourgrilll Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:28 pm
You are a nut, Stompy....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:11 pm
Well, yeah... whee
*goes off to protest protesters that protest*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:56 pm
no i'm not. *walks around with a picket sign that reads 'no more strikes'*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Skimbleshanks Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:14 pm
Gah! gonk Paradox!
If we prevent prevention then we must prevent ourselves from preventing prevention but if we prevent ourselves from preventing prevention then prevention would not be prevented and then we have to attempt to prevent prevention all over again only to have to prevent ourselves from preventing prevention all over again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:26 pm
*bops Althera on the head with sign* get a hold of yourself, girl!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Skimbleshanks Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:01 am
But what if we burn the signs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:54 pm
then we couldn't read 'em! but it wouldn't be cold anymore...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Skimbleshanks Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:04 pm
'Xactly. But, would that not be preventing prevention by preventing the prevention signs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:31 am
Nooooo...this paradox is making me confused..... crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
