|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:13 pm
I wonder what you think about it?
It makes sense: you + all = ya'll?
what do you think?
question
I say no, it is an o.k. word.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:25 pm
It sounds like it should be a contraction of "you" and "will". An alternate form of "you'll."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:49 pm
Isn't it just another way of saying everyone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:38 pm
Hey, douchebag.
It's "y'all," not "ya'all."
Think about it.
You all. Subtract "ou," contract "y" and "all."
Y'all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sdfghjklsdfghjskldfghjkls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:44 pm
I think it makes sense but shan't be used in literature. For the understanding of those who'll get you'll and ya'll mixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:45 pm
Intuicide Hey, douchebag. It's "y'all," not "ya'all." Think about it. You all. Subtract "ou," contract "y" and "all." Y'all. Actually, he's got a point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:46 pm
It's an okie version of you all. I would never use that word in a sentence of mine. (aside from one in this post of course)
And yes, it is y'all, not ya'll. Just read the above post to understand that better, for it was a simple and thorough explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:32 pm
Wow. Duplicate thread, huzzah!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
