|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 3:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:37 am
... It's Bugatti, not Bughatti.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:29 pm
thundergirl16 i hate to brake it to you but thoses bugatti's are ugly as a pile of dog doo The car is built to be fast not pretty.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:55 pm
YES I FINALLY SAW ONE!!! blaugh heart
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 5:55 pm
I'ma top you all......I've seen a custom Dodge Viper that looked like a vette that was black,a drop top black viper,black drop top and hard top convertible,Porsche 911 Turbo,Lambro I mechened......must I go on?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:23 pm
Congrats to you, but I think the Veyron is the worst car ever created.
It weighs as much as a Mercedes and it cost Volkswagen $5 million to build each one, where's the profit? Also, it get's incredibly horrible gas millage (I know its a supercar, but a Ford GT gets 20 mpg, while this thing gets only eight). Also, the only reason the car received a lot of publicity is because it's the most powerful and highest top speed production car to date, a useless standard (a Caparo T1 would kill it in a circuit race) It's a car for people who only want it for the press, not a car for the enthusiast, which is generally what a supercar is marketed towards). Also, for the price, you could get a boatload of other cars.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|