Welcome to Gaia! ::

Gaian Asexuality Guild

Back to Guilds

If you have thoughts on asexuality, you are welcome to discuss them here. 

Tags: asexual, asexuality, lgbtq, sexuality, queer 

Reply Gaian Asexuality Guild
ASEXUALITY NEWS Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Xumbra
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:22 pm


[ Message temporarily off-line ]
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 11:50 pm


http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20060117001505data_trunc_sys.shtml

Quote:
17 February 2006
Sex – Evolution’s Janitor


Asexual reproduction leads to a faster accumulation of bad mutations, says a report in this week's issue of Science. Indiana University evolutionary biologists used the water flea (Daphnia pulex) to establish their findings, which support the hypothesis that sex is an evolutionary housekeeper that efficiently reorders genes and removes deleterious gene mutations. Interestingly, the study also suggests that sexual reproduction maintains its own existence by "punishing" individuals of a species that meander into asexuality. The researchers say that the ability to reproduce asexually may be useful to organisms that can't get mates, but its long-term benefits are questionable.

"It is known that sex is common in plants and animals, and that asexual species are typically short-lived, but why this should hold throughout evolutionary time is a great mystery," said study leader Susanne Paland. "Our results show that asexual deviants are burdened by an ever-increasing number of genetic changes that negatively affect the function of their proteins. It appears sex is important because it rids genomes of harmful mutations."

Sexual reproduction is a complicated, biologically costly business. In mammals, sex is usually preceded by intricate mating behaviors. It requires the compatibility of sexual structures, an insertion event, fertile eggs and sperm, and the successful unification of egg and sperm into a viable zygote. All of this adds up to a big energy investment - energy an organism might have used for other purposes. It's no surprise then, that scientists have long pondered what it is about sex that justifies such a big energy investment.

One of the most widely accepted explanations has been that sexual reproduction confers the benefit of unlinking genes, so that bad versions of genes won't always get to hitch a ride with the good versions. This theory contends that natural selection operates optimally when parts of the genome are free to shuffle about. And the new report provides evidence that this is indeed the case.

The researchers say that in the water flea, sex appears to have enabled the separation of beneficial and deleterious versions of genes, so natural selection could act more efficiently in favoring the good and weeding out the bad. To establish this, they used mitochondrial genome data to compose a phylogenetic tree depicting relationships among sexual and asexual strains of water flea sampled from ponds over a diverse area. This family tree reveals that sexual populations have recently and repeatedly spun off asexual strains. By comparing rates of protein evolution, the researchers found that the asexual lines accumulated bad mutations four times faster than sexual lines.

"Although there has been solid theory on the matter for quite some time, these results provide the first definitive proof at the molecular level that sexual reproduction magnifies the efficiency of natural selection in eliminating deleterious mutations from populations," said co-researcher Michael Lynch.

Paland and Lynch reason that if a switch to asexuality causes a big increase in the number of protein defects, a mechanism for removing those defects must somehow be missing when sex, too, is missing. The present report supports the notion that it is sex - or the genetic recombination that is a component of sexual reproduction - which is the purifying force that helps get rid of genetic mishaps that harm the overall evolutionary health of a population.

Source: Indiana University

Xumbra
Vice Captain


Xumbra
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:59 am


[ Message temporarily off-line ]
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:31 pm


[ Message temporarily off-line ]

Xumbra
Vice Captain


Xumbra
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:16 pm


http://www.progressiveu.org/170757-asexuality-what

Quote:
Asexuality - what?
Hello, I'm asexual.

What's asexuality?
While there are many different people who choose to call themselves asexual, the two most common definitions are
1: An asexual person does not feel physical/sexual attraction at all
2: An asexual person has no desire to have sex
Anyone who chooses to call himself asexual generally uses the term because it fits him best.

Are you sure you're not just gay?
Now, see, I struggled with this thought for awhile. When I was in 5th and 6th grade, I thought, "Well, I don't like boys. I must be gay." Then I discovered, "Ack, I don't like girls, either. What am I?" (And for all you homophobes out there, no, I didn't DO anything to find out I don't like girls. I just knew.)

Why make an entry about this?
I struggled for years to find my sexual identity (which turned out to be "No, thank you."). I want to raise awareness. Many people who I've found on the asexual forum (www.asexuality.org) have said they thought something was wrong with them and they went through long periods of depression before they found out that asexuality exists. They thought they were weird or stupid because they didn't feel the same interest in relationships as their peers did. I want to help someone.

Are you sure asexuality exists?
Lately, there has been research showing that asexuality, or at least the complete lack of sexual interest, is not only exhibited in about 1% of humans, but also in percentages of animals, including, sheep, mice, and certain insects.
Many people believe that people who are asexual MUST have some sort of deficiency that makes them that way. Let me go through the list:
Hormone levels: nope, my hormone levels are where they should be
Past sexual abuse: nope, nothing happened to me
Over-religiousness: well, I am a strong Christian, but I really don't think that has anything to do with it. In fact, if I really wanted to have a child of my own (I don't, I want to adopt), I would probably have sex merely for procreation.

How do you know you don't like sex if you've never had it?
How do you know that you don't like drinking vomit if you've never done it? Hitting your face with a hammer? Falling off a cliff onto jagged rocks? For me, it's something that I just know, exactly like how I just know that I wouldn't like to chew my own hand off.
PostPosted: Sat May 06, 2006 9:49 am


[ Message temporarily off-line ]

Xumbra
Vice Captain


Xumbra
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:15 pm


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/05/07/LVGNOIJDBE1.DTL

Quote:
Sex could be just a sniff away
- Jane Ganahl
Sunday, May 7, 2006

Sex drive. These days, it's topic A. It seems that you either got it or you don't. If you got it, be thankful. If you don't, join the club.

According to the market- research group Synovate, a lack of sex is the No. 1 reason that love grows stale in relationships. And, implicitly, contributes to the divorce rate.

Why do so many couples experience a drop-off in sex? According to the Web site mypleasure.com, the main reasons are, in ascending order: medical problems, aging, sexual abuse, a new baby, body issues, relationship issues, stress and anxiety -- and life itself. With all those cards stacked against having sex, it's a wonder the culture doesn't die off.

Women are especially susceptible to a loss of sex drive. And not just coupled women -- single women I know also have noticed that they think about sex far less than they used to. Of course, one could argue that once women (and people in general) hit a Certain Age, other things just naturally take precedence over getting one's bell rung. Kids, career, other passionate pursuits all line up for equal time. And it's not a bad thing; when I think of the time spent in my youth pursuing hotties instead of working on myself, it's a wonder I have any skills at all. I mean, besides the ones I can't write about.

Others are asking the more pointed question: Who cares? Does one have to have a sex drive to be acceptable in society? The Asexual Visibility and Education Network says no. On the network's Web site asexuality.org, 6,000-plus members say they're building a community worldwide, and the message seems to be, "We're fine just the way we are."

But with all of the books out there urging us to find our inner sexual animal (like Gail Sheehy's recent "Sex and the Seasoned Woman,") it's hard to let go of the notion that we should still be fornicating like rabbits; over the years it becomes part of our self-image. And for a lot of women, losing one's drive feels equivalent to being dead. Or at least close to it. For that reason, more and more products are appearing on the market that are supposed to help women restore that lovely flush in their cheeks that says I'm horny and I don't care who knows it.

Natural herbs, hormone creams, the so-called Female Viagra, even porn. Just recently, a Web site aimed at giving women "a fresh approach to rediscovering passion" was launched: eroticshiver.com.

The equivalent of an audio book club, Erotic Shiver sells audio downloads of sexy stories geared toward women's fantasies. Founded by personal trainer Amanda Clarkson (author of "Who Stole My Sex Drive?"), Erotic Shiver offers a sample snippet of a female rocker describing some hard-core backstage action. Hmm, this might be interesting to me, but it's hard to imagine most of my friends getting off on the idea of punk-rock liaisons.

Then again, it's always been said that the sexiest organ is between one's ears.

The brain plays an important role in the most unique libido-enhancement product I've seen come across my desk: Scentuelle. It's a patch for women to be worn inside the wrist and sniffed liberally all day long. Unlike pharmaceuticals like Viagra, which work on the physical mechanics of sex, Scentuelle claims to work on other all-important factors like mood and a sense of well being. Scentuelle contains ingredients that, when inhaled, are said to stimulate the production of dopamine, the hormone of bliss manufactured by the brain when someone first falls in love.

It's only a short hop between bliss and sex, at least in a dream universe.

Invented by a Scottish scientist and developed by an award- winning inventor, Liz Paul, Scentuelle has been available in Britain for a year, where an alleged 300,000 women are now living happier sex lives thanks to the patch. A month's worth of patches is available at www.myscentuelle.com for $34.95.

Paul explains its magic thusly: "It's aromacology. It works entirely on the smell. Nothing goes into the bloodstream, and it works on the limbic area of the brain, which controls our emotions and attitudes."

Although Scentuelle has its doubters, who note that a placebo test has yet to be done, there also are reams of testimonials by women who claim the patch has done lovely things for them.

Even though I don't feel a flagging in my own sex drive, as a public service -- and for a total lark -- I decide to test-drive these things for a few days to see if I notice any changes. (The Scentuelle people say it often takes a few days before changes are noticeable.)

Day 1: It takes a lot of practice to remember to sniff my wrist once an hour. The patch has a lemony scent -- not at all disagreeable, but it would not make a good perfume. More like a room freshener, really. I don't have a lot of faith that this is working -- yet.

Day 2: I get an e-mail from a man I fancy. I idly wonder what it would be like to have sex with him. Sniff sniff sniff.

Day 3: My kitchen sink backs up horribly and I have to call in a plumber. He weighs about 300 pounds and his pants always threaten to dip too low for dignity's sake. For a moment I start to wonder what it's like for him to have sex, but stop myself. I don't sniff the patch until he's gone. Despite the ugliness of muck in my sink and fog outside my windows, life seems sunny indeed!

Day 4: Run into the mayor at a baby shower. Good God, he is gorgeous. He kisses my cheek and I think I might pass out. I want to tell him to not marry his Scientologist girlfriend but I refrain. My ex-boyfriend also looks wonderful. I need to find a man. What a beautiful day!

Day 5: The drive to Mendocino is extraordinary! So is the town! I need to buy a house here! Retire by the seaside! Wow, the art gallery owner is handsome! I wonder ... I wonder. ...

To sum up: I did think about sex a lot (but I always do), and life seemed quite wonderful indeed. Not that it doesn't always, but this was like, butterflies and rainbows. And who couldn't use more of that in one's life? I mean, in addition to more sex?

E-mail Jane Ganahl at jganahl@sfchronicle.com.
PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:04 pm


http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jul/06072506.html

Quote:
LifeSiteNews.com
Tuesday July 25, 2006

"Asexuals" Seek "Marriage" in China
By Hilary White

July 25, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Scotsman reports that a Chinese matchmaking website is specializing in pairing up "asexuals."

The phenomenon of "asexualism" has been getting press recently as the latest development in the sexual revolution.

The 1960's, 70's and 80's brought us open marriage in which spouses have no intention of remaining faithful; widespread cohabitation in which couples have no intention of becoming spouses; and most recently homosexual "marriage" in which governments are lobbied to abolish marriage as a legal entity entirely.

In the midst of this sexual and legal chaos, according to news reports, increasing numbers of people experience no sexual attraction to either sex, but still seek the emotional intimacy and social stability of marriage. This has provided one Chinese company with an exploitable market niche.

"Marriage for Asexuals" (http://www.wx920.com - in Chinese) is run by a man, a Communist party member and social worker in the southern province of Guangxi, who is only identified by his online pseudonym Lin Hai.

Since its launch a year ago the site has attracted, according to its own count, 7,000 members, about sixty per cent of whom are people who cannot have sexual relations. The rest are homosexuals seeking an opposite-sex spouse.

In 2004, Anthony Bogaert, a psychologist and human sexuality expert at Brock University in St. Catherines, Ontario published a study that showed about 1 per cent of adults showed no interest in sex. The study, published in the Journal of Sex Research, interviewed about 18,000 people about their sexual preferences.

The psychiatric jury is still out as to whether asexuality is a psychological or socio-cultural phenomenon, a "sexual orientation," or merely a manifestation of exasperation among people emotionally exhausted by modern hyper-sexualized culture. While the experts deliberate, however, the world of support organizations has formed around asexuality and declared it a sexual orientation in need of a community.

The Asexual Visibility and Education Network, offers items for sale including a T-shirt with the slogan, "Asexuality: it's not just for amoebas anymore."

Xumbra
Vice Captain


Xumbra
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:45 pm


http://www.abcnews.go.com/2020/Sex/story?id=2395452

Quote:
Sexless and Proud
Asexuals Say They're Misunderstood in a Sex-Obsessed World

-
David Jay has had plenty of girlfriends.
But despite the 24-year-old Californian's success in dating, he's a virgin -- and he plans to stay that way.
He's not joining the priesthood or taking any vow of celibacy; he said he simply has no interest in having sex -- ever.

"I'm sure that life is really, really great when it's all about sex. But life is also really, really great when it's not about sex," he told "20/20's" JuJu Chang.
Keith Walker of Texas was married for four years, but said he had sex only a handful of times.
"I really had no real interest or desire for sex. It was certainly nothing that I would ever think to do."
Nancy Mulligan, a divorcee from Washington state, said her seven-year marriage was never consummated.
"We did other things. We'd watch out for each other. We were affectionate with each other," she said.
When ABC News first covered this story, Walker and Mulligan were just friends. They have since become romantically involved, but say their sex lives haven't changed.
Victoria Glancy and Karl Hodgetts got married in May. They had sex once, but have no real interest in doing it again and still consider themselves asexual.
For the remaining members, giving voice to asexuality is a proud mission.
"I don't really see any difference between our relationship and other people's relationships, except you know, we don't have sex," Glancy said.
No Libido -- No Problem
Who are these people?
From different ages and walks of life, they share one thing in common -- not low libido, but no libido.
They call themselves "asexual," and they proclaim that they are not attracted to men or women.
Jay said his lack of libido was nothing new. He said he'd never experienced attraction -- to either sex.
"I realized that I was asexual because when I was young, all of my friends started being attracted to people, and I had no idea what they were talking about," he said.
It was the same way for Mulligan, who felt isolated for years.
"I thought I was the only one in the world. I had just kind of settled into the rut that I was different and decided to do the best I could with it," she said.
But now asexuals are building a community through a Web site -- asexuality.org. It has chat rooms, sells T-shirts, and says it has 11,000-plus members worldwide.
Jay is the Web site's founder, and the leader of what some call a new asexuality movement.
He explains what's behind the group. "We're told that you need sex to be happy. We're told that the rules are that if you have a relationship, sex has to fit into it this way. And it's kind of fun to break that rule," he said.
Asexuality Is 'Not a Choice'
But some experts question whether asexuality even exists.
There's been virtually no research on the subject. Psychologists disagree on how to define it.
And there's no certainty on what might influence it. Do hormones, genetics, personal experiences play a part? With no clinical or scientific conclusions on the subject, asexuals create their own definition.
And that definition is a far cry from celibacy, Jay pointed out.
"It's not a choice. Celibacy is a choice, whereas asexuality is just the way that you are. Much like being gay is not a choice, or being straight or being right-handed," he said.
Some studies show that asexual behavior exists in the animal world.
Dr. Anthony Bogaert of Brock University in Ontario, who has conducted one of the few studies of human asexuality, said he found as much as 1 percent of the population may be asexual.
"They may still have physiological arousal experiences, vaginal lubrication, erections, but they may not be able to, or [connect] that arousal to men, women or both," Bogaert said.
Living without that connection can be a challenge in a world fixated on sex.
"What I mind is when the idea gets enforced that people need sex. That without sex, you're somehow broken. And of course, we can be happy without sex," Jay said.
Sex Therapist Questions Label
But Joy Davidson, a certified sex therapist, believes Jay and his fellow asexuals may be shortchanging themselves with the asexual label.
"Sex is a fabulous, enormously pleasurable aspect of life. And your saying you don't miss it is like someone in a sense who's colorblind saying, 'I don't miss color.' Of course, you don't miss what you've never had," Davidson said.
Davidson cited a litany of factors that may be at the root of an asexual life.
"There may be something, maybe something physiological, endocrine, maybe something that has to do with trauma, or abuse, or repression, or severe religiosity, that has predisposed you to shutting down the possibility of being sexually engaged," she said.
But the asexuals Chang spoke with for "20/20" said they're perfectly happy as they are.
They said they're used to people questioning their identity. They've even questioned it themselves.
For years Glancy, who wasn't attracted to men, assumed she was a lesbian.
"I have slept with a couple of women, and it was just sort of, 'Oh, well, OK, we've done that now, so we don't have to ever do it again, right,'" she said.
Glancy ultimately decided that she's asexual -- a label Davidson has called problematic.
"You might as well label yourself not curious, unadventurous, narrow-minded, blind to possibilities. That's what happens when you label yourself as sexually neutered," Davidson said.
Some Asexuals Can Have a Change of Heart
Jay said his group was not trying to paint anyone into a corner.
"The thing about the asexual community is that we're not a place people come to to stop exploring themselves. We don't want to slap a label on people and then have that confine them," he said.
It's true that even the most vocal asexuals can have a change of heart. To their astonishment, Glancy and her fiance, Karl Hodgetts, recently discovered that their passions under the covers had been ignited.
Glancy said she and Hodgetts had been getting very close to having sex recently. And Hodgetts is open to that possibility.
"I just feel completely comfortable with Victoria. I don't think I've ever felt so comfortable with someone. And so I'm willing to, you know, try things," he said.
So are Glancy and Hodgetts just ammunition for critics who say asexuals simply haven't found the right partners for themselves?
That doesn't matter to Glancy, because, she said, there's a possibility she won't want to have sex -- or have it more than once.
"I could have sex with Karl one time and go, 'Oh, OK, saw what that was like,' and then not like it," she said.
At first, Glancy said, she felt a bit uncomfortable acknowledging her sexual attraction to her fiance.
"When we were first kind of fooling around, and I'm like, 'Oh, I'm not supposed to like this.' But then that's stupid. I mean, you're just are who you are," she told Chang.
Although they hadn't yet had sex when Chang spoke with them, Glancy and Hodgetts removed themselves from the asexuality Web site.
For the remaining members, giving voice to asexuality remains a proud mission.
Chang asked Jay: "If I had a pill that I could give you to make you sexual, would you want it?"
"I would not take a pill to become a sexual person. I'm having way too much fun as an asexual person," he said.
This story first aired on "20/20" March 24, 2006.
Copyright © 2006 ABC News Internet Ventures
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:36 am


This isn't exactly "news", but it's an article by a blogger in a newspaper.

The joyless club

Sam de Brito
There was an interesting item in Harper's magazine recently about a marriage broker website in China for asexuals looking for partners.

Some of the postings on the site, translated from the Chinese, were heartbreaking:

"Sex has never interested me. In fact, I find it a little filthy. The doctor told me this was common, but it is not a short-term feeling," said 'Little Jiang', a 23-year-old male.

"I am not beautiful or seductive, but I am honest. Because of a birth defect, I might be unable to have a normal sex life. If two people don't have sex, can there be love?" said 'Wishing for Love', a 28-year-old woman.

Asexuality, for those of you who've not encountered it, is a catch-all term for people who lack sexual attraction or otherwise find any form of sexual behavior unappealing.

In a world where we're told a strobing, multi-orgasmic sex-life with only the most beautiful and fascinating partner is of value, it makes you wonder where you fit in if you don't even get horny ...

Growing up, one of the ironies for asexuals is that they often get thrown into the 'opposition camp' so to speak: the women, because they don't want to sleep with blokes are deemed lezzos and the guys are consigned to poofterdom.

How frustrating that must be when you actually don't want to shag anyone.

Not a whole lot of research has been done on asexuality, though a few vague facts — including a classification system that breaks the condition into categories — have been established.

An article I found in the American Salt Lake City Weekly describes them thus:

Type A: Do not experience romantic attraction, but can get sexually aroused. They have no drive to engage in sex. In other words, they're stuck in neutral.

Type B: Experience romantic attraction, but have no sex drive. They want to explore, but the gear stick is jammed.

Type C: Capable of both arousal and romantic attraction, but have no drive to put the two together. There just isn't enough petrol.

Type D: Feel neither attraction nor arousal. This is the most common type of asexual. These people prefer to avoid driving altogether.

These classifications, of course, do not include people who suffer from birth defects or genital complications that make sex painful or uncomfortable.

A woman I know who often told me she was asexual, spent most of her teens and 20's being told she was weird or a lesbian so often did she eschew sex because a vaginal complication made it plain agony.

When it was finally diagnosed and corrected, she hit powerband and now shags for Australia.

Other researchers contend that asexuality is the result of the mixing of two distinct psychological disorders.

The first, hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), pertains to individuals who, given the chance to get a leg over, will either give it a miss altogether or bear it without pleasure.

In other words those people who don't get horny.

Those afflicted by HSDD apparently don't fantasise about sex, but may be up for bumping uglies for the sake of their romantic partner.

Sexual Aversion Disorder (SAD), on the other hand, describes people who run a mile to avoid intercourse. Sex and pleasure exist as polar opposites and they can't bear the thought of getting frisky, no matter how much they want to please their partner.

Finally, it should be said that many asexuals assert that because their asexuality does not cause them distress, it should not be viewed as a disorder at all; some people dislike bodysurfing and mangos, asexuals just happen to dislike sex.

You've got to wonder the pressure it puts on a man if he's completely sexless, considering the massed messages of male virility we see in the media today.

And when you read the personals on Asexual Marriage Net, it's hard to believe many asexuals don't at least wish they could change the situation.

"Due to a physical dysfunction, I cannot have sex. I don't dare let a woman love me since I do not want to harm an innocent girl or ruin another person's life. But whenever I look at the grey hairs of my parents, the pressure to marry has me feeling beat. I must repay them for the decades they spent raising me. Maybe you and I can come together to make a house of misfortune?"

Are you asexual?


Again, this is a blog post, but it's from a news site. This one isn't directly related to asexuality, but this blogger is considered the female counterpart of the one who wrote the article quoted above, and it implies that sex is essential for happiness.

The Art of Happiness

Samantha Brett
What is happiness? A pay rise? Losing weight? Death by chocolate? An orgasm? "Yes, yes, yes!" I hear many of you say. But more on that in a moment.

The Dalai Lama onced mused that the search for happiness is our sole purpose in life. Comedian Bob Monkhouse reckons the search is over when you marry a girl for love and later discover that she has money. My friend Hank believes it's winning the lotto.

But apparently both Monkhouse and Hank have it all wrong. Instead, a recent poll, which surveyed Illinois and British lotto winners, found that while winners did get an initial high from having more money in the pockets, it quickly wore off. After a few months the sudden millionaires were simply left with their usual range of happiness, but no happier.

So if money doesn't give us happiness, what does? The answer, apparently, is sex...

Yep, money won't bring you happiness, but a better sex life might.

Not surprised? Well according to research done by Dartmouth College economist David Blachflower and Andrew Oswald of the University of Warwick in England, it's sex that "enters so strongly [and] positively in happiness equations", not more money that puts a long term smile on our dial.

Just how was this juicy secret discovered? Well the eager researchers took a deeper look into the sexual activity and happiness levels of 16,000 people and found that doing it once a week (instead of the average once a month), is equivalent to the amount of happiness generated by getting an additional $65,000 of income!

Now that's a whole lot of grinning.

Of course the knowledge that sex equals happiness is nothing new. Meg Ryan certainly knew it in the film When Harry Met Sally, during the infamous orgasm scene carried out in Katz's Deli, New York, which prompted other customers to order exactly what she was having, and pronto.

So it was only fitting that, during a recent trip to New York, for research purposes of course, I would follow in Ryan's footsteps. Hence I headed off to the famous cafe in the hope of having some of what she was having.

After fighting off a few brash New Yorkers to get Meg's actual seat (I wasn't the only one who had travelled 10,000 miles in search of the happy bug), the combination of the icy New York weather, my overdrawn credit card and an increasingly sore throat led me to wonder whether the search for more happiness was in fact futile. If it wasn't a pastrami sandwich and a hot date, what the hell was it?

Perhaps the Dalai Lama was right when he said that "sooner or later our overall level of happiness tends to migrate back to a certain baseline".

It's the process psychologists have dubbed "adaptation". In other words, while a pay rise, fancy new car or hot date might spike our sense of happiness just for a little while, we quickly get used to it and the happy effect soon wears off.

That's why I'm not a tad bit envious at David Beckham's $US250 million pay deal. He might be happy now, but he'll soon adapt to it all and then he'll go back to being just as happy as the rest of us. Let's just hope the extra dosh helps wife Victoria to smile once in a while, or we might have to feed her a pastrami sandwich ...

Can money bring happiness? Or is a better sex life the answer?

What is happiness to you?


Both blogs have comments / discussions attached, and you don't need an account to join the discussion, so go ahead and read the comments as well.

The MoUsY spell-checker
Crew

Reply
Gaian Asexuality Guild

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum