|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:59 pm
Jackson trial is finally over, and he wasn't acquitted biggrin
What do you all think about it?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:05 pm
For me, think that this case was mostly bull from the begining.
It seemed like yet another attempt for someone to make quick money without doing any work, by simpy turning to the legal system and saying that he was molested. Someone thats been criticized by the media and public to a large extent was chosen to make sure that the majority of the public was against the prosecution, and the facts that had previously occured were manipulated in a way that it would seem that the defense was guilty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:05 am
I dont know,if I was a fan I would definetly think he was innocent from the beggining,but now they have all this stuff about the people trying to make some money,so jackson probably was innocent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:06 pm
I dont really care. As long as he doesnt touch me or anyone I care about its all good. I think he may have done it though, mainly because I dont know hat to think of him/her. He used to be black, now hes white, and he also used to be a he....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:05 pm
The entire day today they had this huge marathon of cruddy jokes these people were trying to tell on the air on Q101 that didn't makesense.
This one guy said somehting like "Whats the difference between Jackson and a plastic bag? Both are white and hazardous to children, but one carries groceries"
I don't get it confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 7:08 am
roguemeanies The entire day today they had this huge marathon of cruddy jokes these people were trying to tell on the air on Q101 that didn't makesense. This one guy said somehting like "Whats the difference between Jackson and a plastic bag? Both are white and hazardous to children, but one carries groceries" I don't get it confused Whats the diffrence between acne and Jackson? Acne doesnt c** on your face till your 13. lol Its acctuly not that funny but yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:54 pm
roguemeanies For me, think that this case was mostly bull from the begining. It seemed like yet another attempt for someone to make quick money without doing any work, by simpy turning to the legal system and saying that he was molested. Someone thats been criticized by the media and public to a large extent was chosen to make sure that the majority of the public was against the prosecution, and the facts that had previously occured were manipulated in a way that it would seem that the defense was guilty. words taken from my mouth, ally
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:41 pm
I dunno what to think anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:28 am
to be honest....im not really sure if he did it or not..but i would have to agree with rouge... it did seem like they were only sueing him for the money...but i kind of tuned the whole trial out and havent really been paying much attention....but yeah.... eek he just seems to be too child-like to be into that..but i dont know... sweatdrop lol...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
