Isn't the official 9/11 story a good enough conspiracy to begin with? An Islamic terrorist group, angered by American presence in the Middle East and Palestinian affairs, formulate a plan to hijack American commecial planes and fly them into important landmarks and systematically carry it out. That, by definition, is a conspiracy.
"Loose Change," however, is bullshit.
DaxCordite
Maybe if the US didn't have Term Limits I could see it(as in 4-8 years someone else gets the job). Or if our Invasion of Iraq and Afganistan were for permenant Ocupation and control but Neither is the case.
In both Cases the plan is to eventually pull out when the New Governments are fully established.
Of course, conspiracy theorists would tie such a conspiracy in with bullshit about many major politicians belonging to the same exact freemasons and secret societies and that even replacement leaders are in on the whole scheme the original leader established.
However, the fact remains that:
(1) "Loose Change's" tactic of zooming in on already grainy digital footage does not prove that there was an explosion before the planes hit the towers.
(2) The idea that the American government could orchestrate an attack against its own people yet somehow leave their tracks uncovered for a meer college student to piece together the entire plot is baffling.
(3) The idea that the American government could orchestrate an attack against its own people and sell the story that Islamic terrorists are responsible for the entire thing but fail to kill a meer college student who uncovers the real conspiracy is baffling.
Reply
