redhairsword
What I don't get is why we need these designations.
I took two quizes. One said I was an Uke and the other said I was a Seme.
What they said about my personality was the same in both (and spot on, I might add) But one thought that I was being walked on by a Seme and the other thought it was giving of myself to an Uke.
Most people, and couples, don't really fit these neat little boxes. Right?
I took two quizes. One said I was an Uke and the other said I was a Seme.
What they said about my personality was the same in both (and spot on, I might add) But one thought that I was being walked on by a Seme and the other thought it was giving of myself to an Uke.
Most people, and couples, don't really fit these neat little boxes. Right?
XD i completely agree. These are just phrases that make things like often-unrealistic fiction easier to understand. Every gay person I've ever met has never identified themselves as a 'seme', 'uke', 'neko', or 'tachi' It's honestly not even necessary, i think D: I don't think people would like to label their relationships with such shallow[.. i can't think of another word XDD!] terms.
