|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:52 pm
i'm showing off my trap deck just incase anyone wanted to duel against it. it's pretty powerful and has alot of good traps.
Anger of Uria: x50
monsters:
bubonic vermin x3
mask of darkness x3
uria, lord of searing flames
witch doctor of chaos x2
mirage dragon x3
nimal monmonga x3
mystical beast sersket (in japenese)
vampire lord x2
hand of nephythis
sacred phoexnix nephythis
spell:
graceful charity
final destiny x2
monster riencarnation x3
card destruction
cathedral of nobels x2 ((in japenese) japenese name: kings temple)
heavy storm
trap:
sakuretsu armour x3
disgraceful charity x2
embodiment of apophis x3
metal reflect slime x3
magic jammer
seven tools of the bandit
chain burst
blast held by tribute x2
blast with chain x3
mirror force
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:20 am
my fiend deck is pretty sweet too. please tell me your reactions, if any, you have. hope you like guys.
Phantasmal Destroyer: x50
monsters:
giant germ x3
infernal incenerator
dark necrofear x2
viser des x3
winged minion x2
gil garth x3
slate warriar x3
wall of illusion x2
giant orc x2
second goblin x2
dark ruler ha-des
rabiel lord of phantasms
spell:
dark energy x3
fiends sancuary x2 (one japenese one not)
the cheerful coffin x2
drag down into the grave
graceful charity
yami x3
traps:
bark of the dark ruler x3
sakuretsu armour x2
shift x2
dark spirit of the silent x2
staunch defender
ominous fortune telling x2
call of the haunted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:25 am
hamon is finally here. because of his effect he's in a burn deck of my own design. hope you like. tell me any reactions you might have,
Thunder Reign: x50
monsters:
hamon, lord of striking thunder
blast sphere x3
adhesive explosive x2
reflectbounder x2
ameba x2
marshmallon
des koala x2
thunder dragon x3
cannon soilder x2
summoned skull
spell:
dark room of nightmare x3
burning land x2
vengeful bog spirit
wave-motion cannon x2
creature swap x2
makiu x2
polymerization
graceful charity
raigeki (banned)
traps:
destruction ring x2
nightmare wheel x3
secret barrel x3
hallowed life barriar x2
ominous fortune telling x2
coffin seller
fusion:
twin headed thunder dragon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:51 pm
i thought vampire lords were restricted...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:47 am
divineseraph i thought vampire lords were restricted... two per deck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 7:00 pm
Vampire Lord isn't limited at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crono Leonhart Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:44 pm
You know, I never seen anyone running Vampire Lady...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:34 am
why feral imps,ryukishins and the infernal incierator?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:40 pm
Kyzain why feral imps,ryukishins and the infernal incierator? feral imps and ryukishin powered are good for the cheerful coffin and dark necrofear. and infernal incinerator for it's sheer power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:47 am
Cathedral is banned dude...even in japan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crono Leonhart Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:08 am
Last Messiah Cathedral is banned dude...even in japan. Okay, what are you even talking about neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:07 pm
Night Assailant is limited and Graceful charity is not banned. You could also try running some Dark World monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:03 am
Last Messiah Cathedral is banned dude...even in japan. the cathedral of nobles or king's temple isn't banned, it isn't even limited or semi limited. tsk tsk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:05 am
DarkRyu_89 Night Assailant is limited and Graceful charity is not banned. You could also try running some Dark World monsters. i thought graceful charity was banned. i should check the list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
