Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Pro-Choice Gaians
I need some help. Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

?
  !
View Results

Half Baked SF

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:59 am


Lupine Pyrefly
Deformography
Where is it? I want a go at it!
He's right here, if you want a stab at him.
Him again gonk
PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:30 am


PersephoneMediocris
And does he know that they do kill off all the unwanted pets? That bugs me a lot more than abortion ever will.

Offtopic, but shelters do try to find homes for all of the animals who are not a danger to humans. They often will not put down animals unless they need the space for other animals, and there is usually a 10 day or more period before an animal would be considered for being put to sleep to make room.

Shelters also spay or neuter all of the animals they get, to try to keep the problem more under control. They do try very, very hard to get all of the animals they have in homes, and do not want to put any animal to sleep unless they really, really have to.

WatersMoon110


Peppermint Schnapps

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:40 pm


LadyInWhite
Lord Setar
Quote:
she's such a cute fetus! Yeah, I agree with you, Prolife man, and its the only thing I really stand strong on politically. hehe, funny thing, a friend of mine saw this on car the other day. A sticker on top said STOP WAR and then the sticker right below it said PRO CHOICE...kinda ironic, isn't it? sigh...the stupid world of today, no respect for the human life.


........AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGH
LIKE OMGWTF! scream scream scream

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGH! INDEED!

LOL BECAUSE THE FETII HAVE FAMILIES, CHILDREN OF THEIR OWN, AND ARE DYING FOR A POINTLESS CAUSE, RIGHT?

:fase2desk:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:36 pm


PhaedraMcSpiffy
“Ahh, how's about that. I guess since women absolutely cannot live without sex, then they should take it out on the innocent party when they get pregnant.”

It is possible to live without sex.

But sexual pleasure is a basic human right and is on the hierarchy of NEEDS for medical patients.

Unless that sexual pleasure infringes on your rights, you have no right to inhibit the sexuality of another human being.

“I guess that goes for rape and incest, too. There's already been one victim, might as well make two. Two wrongs DO make a right... right?”

The child can’t be a victim if it’s not born. Abortion will spare the child and mother what could be more emotional trauma, pain, humiliation, shame, poverty and further intrusion of bodily domain.

Abortion will only harm the mother if it is not truly her choice to abort.

“And since birth defects warrant death, I vote we round up all the mentally challanged or crippled people in the coutry and gas them to death. They're just sucking up our recourses, anyway.”

They are invading no-ones bodily domain and are, in many cases, capable of living on their own.

They are also born citizens protected under the 14th amendment.

“Funny how you utterly fail to grasp sarcasm (I can help you by pointing out other areas I'm being sarcastic, if you like). I never said I was right or wrong to break his fingers, only that if abortionists want "fairness", then it was absolutely right for me to.”

Abortionists want only to do their jobs, and various other wants that all humans share.

“And say, funny how screaming for help, running away, seeing the the authorities, etc. isn't a valid method to avoid rape. Or are they? I guess rape is no longer a valid reason to abort at all, since everyone has so much control over their surroundings!And I broke his fingers because he tackled me and I rolled over on his hand. I had a lot of choice in that matter, after all. Again, funny how victims are the ones who get punished. ”

Did I saw that it was wrong to use force when al of these other methods failed? No.

It IS odd that the victims of rape are punished. After all, they are often subjected to humiliating tests, arduous court cases, and brutal attacks to their identity and integrity. Why add forced incubation and childbirth to this list?

“Thank you. I am now completely justified to go to the nearest hospital and pull the plug on every person in a coma and/or with a debilitating disease. They're not people. Actually, I think I might enjoy stabbing them to death more.”

How very pro-life of you. Nice to see someone who values “the sanctity of life” SO much that it’s a joke to them.

And again, these people are doing you no harm. You seem to have trouble distinguishing between things that involve you and things that don’t.

“Funny how this one opinion that fetii are believed to be in a coma-like state doesn't explain why every birth I've been aroud, the child knew its mother's AND father's voice.”

First of all: I attached an article about this. The opinion was that of a scientist after doing actual research. The opinion is at least an educated one.

Your opinion was based on casual observations of live births. How many births have you seen in which this was the case? How do you know the infant was responding to the mother and father’s voices? Is it possible that it could have responded differently on instinct, because the mother and father were talking to it while the nurses and doctors were treating it like any other birth they’ve seen?

Your anecdote is hardly as valid as an actual scientific study.

“Or why when people come out of comas, they often remember what was going on while they were in said coma and can recall news events and visits.”

1. These people were in comas, but were not inside of a womb. It’s possible that the latter state could affect hearing.
2. At what point does a fetus typically show reflexive responses to sound?
3. The adults in a coma were fully developed. The fetus was not.

“Also funny that partial birth abortion was outlawed as being inhumane because the babies screamed bloody murder as their heads were cracked open and their brains sucked out before birth. Not like they could possibly be screaming because they were in pain. Screaming is just something everyone does for fun from birth, right?”

“Partial birth abortion” is not a scientific term. It is, apparently, often used to make late abortions seem worse than they are by pro-life activists. The actual medical term is intact dilation and extraction.

This story sounds very sensationalized and fake. Please submit evidence that proves it’s not made up. Here, just to be fair, I’ll present you with some information on so-called partial-birth abortion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intact_dilation_and_extraction (This appears to be an unbiased source, despite the potential for inaccuracy.)


http://www.plannedparenthood.org/birth-control-pregnancy/abortion.htm (Info. on later abortions.)

“Absolutely, because there are SO many more people who become the next Hitler than people who make medical or scientific advancements. Forget the fact that technology increases exponentially, that's just luck.”

My saying that they could become the next Hitler is just as futile, absurd, speculative and pointless as you saying they could find a cure for cancer.

That’s the point I was making.

“Well, that's strange, because children's rights override parental rights, anyway.”

You’ve made this claim a lot, and I’ve been ignoring it a lot. Know why? Because the burden of proof --or AT LEAST and explanation on why you hold this opinion—is on you.

I’m waiting. Legal proof, philosophical proof…. Come on. Got anything? This is a key argument. You do realize that failure to prove this results in failure of your argument against bodily domain? And really, that’s all the matters in this debate.

Oh, and another thing to ponder: A fetus isn’t considered a child yet by many people. So to them, they aren’t harming a child at all. They are merely stopping the development of a living clump of human cells. There are no mothers and no children when the fetus is aborted.

“"But those women made their CHOICES to have their children."

Its a shame your mother did, too.”

Are you implying that you would have forced my mother to have an abortion if you could prevent my birth?!

Not helping your side. You’ve lost the illusion of benevolence enough.

PhaedraMcSpiffy


PhaedraMcSpiffy

PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:28 pm


[quote="PhaedraMcSpiffy]“Since I'm expected to reply for other people's comments, though, I'll just take this one straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak, and wait for an explanation: "Human life deserves no respect. No life deserves respect." "No one has more rights than another."”

That first comment you quoted: THAT’S the one I have an issue with. All life deserves respect. Life is sacred to nearly everyone, and if it’s not sacred to somebody, it IS a basic human right and needs to at least be respected as such.

But in my opinion, a life, a body, belongs to the owner. Not the government, not the woman’s family, not her lover, not a religious group. All of her decisions are hers to make.

Similarly, motherhood is a gift. And, as the saying goes, “A gift coerced is not a gift.” It’s theft. The second quote I do agree with. Nobody can coerce anyone into giving them their body. Not even an innocent fetus.

“Problem solved. Women have no rights over a fetus, or a cow, or a dog. (Oh, forgot you still don't seem to notice when I use sarcasm. That was a case, right there.)”

I’m assuming you’re using sarcasm about that first one.

Because if you are, you’re exactly right! The debate isn’t about whether or not the fetus is alive. It’s about bodily domain. To prevent a woman from ending an unwanted pregnancy is putting the fetus’ rights above hers. It is forced incubation.

It would be nice is unwanted pregnancies didn’t exist. It would be nice if there was no need for abortion or birth control. But we have to live in reality. People have and will always have sex for pleasure, women will always get pregnant, and some of those pregnancies will always be unplanned. An even smaller percentage will have to be ended.

If you REALLY want to lower abortion rates, support sex education and birth control. Those are proven to lower it. But even with that, you won’t be able to end abortion. Just legal, safe abortion.

Tell me, hypothetically, if abortion is so unacceptable to you that it cannot remain legal, what will you do? How do you punish these women, who you believe have commited murder? And the nurses and doctors? What will you do for the poor women who can’t afford to support a child? What of the women who will definitely be crippled for the rest of their lives or killed because of a high-risk pregnancy? Who will care for the new influx of disabled children? How do you propose we fix our already overcrowded and insufficient adoption system so that we may support even more unwanted children? What will you do for children whose parents abuse or neglect them because they only exist because they were an accident?

And just as important, how will you explain to half the population that a fetus has more rights than them, and that their body is not theirs to control? How do you explain to these women that they aren’t responsible enough to make their own reproductive choices?

This issue isn’t as simple or as trivial as you make it out to be.

Don’t expect to make claims that my rights should be taken away and that I will not ask you to justify your opinion.


This is the most heated debate I've ever had.
PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:39 pm


http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/28014132/

Now I need help with this guy!

Anybody have advice on how to refute any of the following?

Comparing abortion to the holocaust.
Violation of bodily domain does not warrant the deaht penalty.
Comparing the fetus to mentally disabled.
"If the fetus is breaking the law, let it die of natural causes."
Anything evil can be "justified" if you try hard enough.
Illegalizing Abortion is not constricting women's rights.
"Pregnant women need to suck it up, they're only having their rights taken away for nine months."
"You only take offense to comparing abortion to the holocaust because it exposes you as dehumanizing fetii."


This guy is REALLY tricky. I think I just dug the hole a lot deeper. He's wearing me down by making me tired of arguing, and I just realized that a lot of may arguments will probably be flipped back around at me.

Advice, anyone?

PhaedraMcSpiffy

Reply
Pro-Choice Gaians

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum