|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:09 pm
Dukes Reloaded Anagove Then I close my eyes and try to smile--I like that idea, but I don't think questions like "Do you have a role" should be allowed...
maybe questions like "Are you affiliated with someone with a special role" or other questions like that
or... who knows XD but good idea! --I know things are bad and getting worse! Would be a useless question anyhow... GCDer is a role. biggrin That's also a good idea. :3 (also, just ask "are you a GCDer?" XD)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:10 pm
Dukes Reloaded Anagove Then I close my eyes and try to smile--I like that idea, but I don't think questions like "Do you have a role" should be allowed...
maybe questions like "Are you affiliated with someone with a special role" or other questions like that
or... who knows XD but good idea! --I know things are bad and getting worse! Would be a useless question anyhow... GCDer is a role. biggrin Then I close my eyes and try to smile--A role, but not a SPECIAL role >.> --I know things are bad and getting worse!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:10 pm
HirunHikari sweatdrop If anything, we should get rid of the G-Team. They're useless unless they pick the same person as a killer. :<  That's still a chance that someone is saved. Better than none, getting rid of the GTeam serves what purpose? Less roles? Not really the problem.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:11 pm
Anagove Dukes Reloaded Anagove Then I close my eyes and try to smile--I like that idea, but I don't think questions like "Do you have a role" should be allowed...
maybe questions like "Are you affiliated with someone with a special role" or other questions like that
or... who knows XD but good idea! --I know things are bad and getting worse! Would be a useless question anyhow... GCDer is a role. biggrin Then I close my eyes and try to smile--A role, but not a SPECIAL role >.> --I know things are bad and getting worse! I was talking about the original "Do you have a role" question... not the one you made which had the special bit...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:20 pm
Those were crappy 'not much thought used' questions anyway. Besides thats a small detail that can be worked out later.
As for getting rid of the G-team, they may not be helpful very often but once in a while they do get their job done. It would kind of be like getting rid of the NR just because we keep getting very vauge clues that don't narrow down the suspects.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Y'know, I had pretty much the same idea all of you are having right now XD. Weird, huh? Anyway, the idea I had to spice things up was the GM to pick a word or phrase and make it 'taboo'; ie. you say this forbidden word or phrase and you die, but the GM won't tell anybody what this taboo word is except maybe in the form of vague clues.
That made no sense, did it? XD
And as for making another newsreporter-like role, we could call it the interrogator; they'd be able to ask questions such as "Are you in an alliance?" or "Do you know the identity of the sniper/CK/ etc.?" Just a thought.
I was also thinking about how the G-Team could be more useful. Perhaps the sniper and CK could give the G-Team vague hints about their targets? Again, just a thought.
...I have waaaay to many ideas here. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:44 pm
*tired* I didn't get to play in the last game, I have a pretty vague idea of what's going on anyway.
If anything, we can deviate. If the norm is less sane, then we must become more insane to deviate. Or return to normality.
o.o That's good. XD Choose a smart or stupid... heh. I need sleep. x.o;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:13 pm
Phoenecia Y'know, I had pretty much the same idea all of you are having right now XD. Weird, huh? Anyway, the idea I had to spice things up was the GM to pick a word or phrase and make it 'taboo'; ie. you say this forbidden word or phrase and you die, but the GM won't tell anybody what this taboo word is except maybe in the form of vague clues. That made no sense, did it? XD And as for making another newsreporter-like role, we could call it the interrogator; they'd be able to ask questions such as "Are you in an alliance?" or "Do you know the identity of the sniper/CK/ etc.?" Just a thought. I was also thinking about how the G-Team could be more useful. Perhaps the sniper and CK could give the G-Team vague hints about their targets? Again, just a thought. ...I have waaaay to many ideas here. xd Don't like the first idea... like the other two though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:18 pm
KamonDragon *tired* I didn't get to play in the last game, I have a pretty vague idea of what's going on anyway.
If anything, we can deviate. If the norm is less sane, then we must become more insane to deviate. Or return to normality.
o.o That's good. XD Choose a smart or stupid... heh. I need sleep. x.o;  homg. teal twin. 
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:25 pm
I think there needs to be a better chance for the Killers to win.
Maybe if the killers were allowed to know who each other were?
Or...
Well, I was kind of thinking of a way for the people who were jailed to be able to take out another person...
Kind of like, let them vote people into the jail. While the GCDers are voting someone into jail.
So two people die, two people are jailed.
Just a thought. Then there's more strategy. Don't piss of the people you'll jail.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:27 pm
Zaeyde I think there needs to be a better chance for the Killers to win. Maybe if the killers were allowed to know who each other were? Or... Well, I was kind of thinking of a way for the people who were jailed to be able to take out another person... Kind of like, let them vote people into the jail. While the GCDers are voting someone into jail. So two people die, two people are jailed. Just a thought. Then there's more strategy. Don't piss of the people you'll jail. Jailbirds jailing their jailers? I love it! xDDD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:28 pm
Zaeyde I think there needs to be a better chance for the Killers to win. Maybe if the killers were allowed to know who each other were? Or... Well, I was kind of thinking of a way for the people who were jailed to be able to take out another person... Kind of like, let them vote people into the jail. While the GCDers are voting someone into jail. So two people die, two people are jailed. Just a thought. Then there's more strategy. Don't piss of the people you'll jail.  :O I like that idea. Jailbirds voting. But only after a certain point, or on Day One, we'll have an autojail. 
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:29 pm
HirunHikari Zaeyde I think there needs to be a better chance for the Killers to win. Maybe if the killers were allowed to know who each other were? Or... Well, I was kind of thinking of a way for the people who were jailed to be able to take out another person... Kind of like, let them vote people into the jail. While the GCDers are voting someone into jail. So two people die, two people are jailed. Just a thought. Then there's more strategy. Don't piss of the people you'll jail.  :O I like that idea. Jailbirds voting. But only after a certain point, or on Day One, we'll have an autojail.  Nope. I like the idea of having the first in jail get an autojail. XD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:30 pm
Zaeyde HirunHikari Zaeyde I think there needs to be a better chance for the Killers to win. Maybe if the killers were allowed to know who each other were? Or... Well, I was kind of thinking of a way for the people who were jailed to be able to take out another person... Kind of like, let them vote people into the jail. While the GCDers are voting someone into jail. So two people die, two people are jailed. Just a thought. Then there's more strategy. Don't piss of the people you'll jail.  :O I like that idea. Jailbirds voting. But only after a certain point, or on Day One, we'll have an autojail.  Nope. I like the idea of having the first in jail get an autojail. XD xDD That is an awesome, awesome idea.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Zaeyde HirunHikari Zaeyde I think there needs to be a better chance for the Killers to win. Maybe if the killers were allowed to know who each other were? Or... Well, I was kind of thinking of a way for the people who were jailed to be able to take out another person... Kind of like, let them vote people into the jail. While the GCDers are voting someone into jail. So two people die, two people are jailed. Just a thought. Then there's more strategy. Don't piss of the people you'll jail.  :O I like that idea. Jailbirds voting. But only after a certain point, or on Day One, we'll have an autojail.  Nope. I like the idea of having the first in jail get an autojail. XD -makes a mental note to make herself super suspicious in the future- Bwahaha?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|