Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Pro-life Guild
Abortion: This generation isn't buying it.

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

symphonic

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:12 pm


When I read this, it both angered me and gave me hope.
None of us want abortion to continue. But I think I speak for all of us when I say women CHOOSING not to abort, even with it out there, would be the greatest victory of all, far above the government having to put its foot down.

Please comment.


Quote:
According to the latest report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), nearly half of the women who had an abortion in 1997 had had at least one previous abortion. Nearly one in five of those women had undergone at least two abortions.

In its December 8, 2000, report of state and national abortion statistics for the year 1997,1 the CDC found that 45.5% of women having abortions reported having one, two, three, or more previous abortions. Only a little bit more than half (52%) were reported as never having had a previous abortion.

The status of the remaining 2.5% was listed as "unknown." As far as can be determined from available data, this is believed to be the highest number of repeat abortions the CDC has ever recorded.

Over a quarter of the women (26.8%) reported having one previous abortion. About one in nine (11.2%) reported two, while 7.4% reported having three or more previous abortions.

Not every state reported data on previous abortions to the CDC. While incomplete, the data, drawn from 37 state health departments and New York City, gives valuable insight into the state of abortion in America and trends among abortion clinic customers.

Hawaii (61.5%), Maryland (70.5%), New Jersey (53%), and New York (56.5%) reported the highest numbers of abortion repeaters. The city of New York, whose data was also listed separately, had a 63.7% repeat rate. It also had the highest percentage of any reporting areas indicating three or more previous abortions (17.1%).

While in the early days of Roe, few women reported having previous abortions (according to the National Center for Health Statistics, 13.2% in 1974, and 18.1% in 1975), that number grew steadily through the 1970s and 80s until it leveled off in the 42-45% range in the 1990s.

The abortion lobby often advances the claim that some 43% of all American women will have at least one abortion by the time they are 45 years old. National Right to Life has never been able to confirm such a statistic. The high number of repeat abortions raises questions about precisely how they are counted and distributed among the population of women as a whole.2

What is clear, however, is that with repeat abortions approaching 50%, America's abortion clinics are increasingly relying on repeat customers for their business. Intimations by the abortion lobby that women turn to abortion only in circumstances of distress or dire emergency are belied by the fact that a large number of women are obviously using abortion as a backup means of birth control.

The odd silver lining in these statistics on repeat abortions is that their persistence in a time of overall decline in the number of annual abortions in the U.S. (from 1.6 million in 1990 to about 1.3 million in 19973) is an indication that the abortion industry is attracting fewer first-time victims. The younger generation isn't buying abortion the way their mothers, aunts, and older sisters did.

For example, when abortion was first legalized in the 1970s, the distribution of abortions between teens, women in their early 20s, and women in the upper end of their reproductive years was about one-third for each category. Recent statistics show widening gaps between these groups. Teens accounted for just one-fifth (20.1%) of all abortions while women 25 years and over approached half (48.2%) in 1997.

While there is a long way to go, these statistics hint that abortion as a cause or even as an option worth considering is losing steam among the younger generation. While older women may be keeping the clinics open, it is increasingly obvious that abortion is not the choice of the new generation.


source
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:47 pm


Interesting. All the women I've known who have had abortions have been fully capable of caring for the child. The only reason for having the abortion was that they weren't ready to care for a baby. And I have know several teens who have chosen to have their babies when they found out they were pregnant even though they were given the option to abort by their moms or friends. I truly hope that the truth about abortion is sinking in to the the minds of the younger generation. If it is we might have a brighter future. Thanks for sharing the info.

stormnexus


Theallpowerfull

PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:25 pm


I think that's because people are becoming more educated on the subject. We are also less ashamed of having children at an early age or without a partner to help raise them. Newer Generations are maturing faster, but also differently. I think we are all maturing as a whole in that aspect while we decline in others. 3nodding
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:41 am


(does the happy dance)

But i've seen it before.

DCVI
Vice Captain


Rogue Of Time

PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:43 am


I agree totally on the "women have to agree" argument... even if legalized abortion isn't around, women could purposely stress themselves out, beat themselves, etc. to kill the child. I have noticed that people in my High School who have had "unexpected additions" have ALL had the child, though I may be wrong. After all, it's kind of easy to spot someone who is seven months pregnant. =P

I was talking to my friends over the weekend, and all of my MALE friends agreed that the baby's life should only be thrown away if the baby wants it that way - and since the baby can't think the baby should be protected. All of my FEMALE friends thought that the baby had no say whatsoever, though, since it was living inside the female's body, so the female could kill it if she so chooses. That's the problem I have - telling the woman that it's not HER body she's harming, it's the baby's, because then they go into a huge argument about how babies are just parasites when they're fetuses, and how acorns aren't trees, etcetera etcetera... It's kind of hard to explain to someone that stubborn that an accorn IS a tree if it's planted, nurtured, and taken care of, because then they just argue that it's their choice. Basically, it is, but it's not their life so I feel they shouldn't act upon that choice since it doesn't just affect their life, ya know?

((shrugs helplessly)) Hopefully these statistics are tellin' the truth, and that younger women AREN'T getting abortions as much as they used to... that means that there are fewer and fewer people sleepin' around casually and getting abortions as a "backup" which means that's fewer people to convince that abortion is wrong. Hey, every step counts, especially for babies, right? ^-^
PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:52 am


actually, most people I know who're prochoice...

are male.

Look at the image: liberating females, sex without worries, being kind compassionate and sympathetic to the plight of womankind. Equals up to easier sex....

I think a big thing is people who were prochoice turn prolife and it influences their kids. Even "Jane Roe" converted. As people get older they realize the implications, and make sure thier children understand as well. Just my own personal theory...

That and kidsa ren't totally stupid.

lymelady
Vice Captain

Reply
The Pro-life Guild

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum