Welcome to Gaia! ::

One, science truly doesn't have all the answers. The scientific understanding of the origin of life and the universe are only theorietical and not always the most empirical. We'll never know for sure exactly what happened because we can't go back to the past to observe what happened.

Two, humans have a very hard time comprehending true nothingness. In fact, they can't do it. Nothingness itself is a word that has a definition, and then, is no longer nothing, it's something. It's a word with a definition. Nothingness cannot be described with a word, because as soon as you describe it, it isn't nothing anymore. So, it's real hard for humans to think about something coming from nothing... we can't understand nothingness! We instead make this assumption that everything had to come from somewhere, even if that thing be called 'nothingness' (which again, since we're defining it, it ceases to be what it is trying to define).

Perhaps nothingness in itself is a creative force that we just can't understand. All things go through a cycle of non-existence and existence. Only it isn't quite that simple. If we apply the Law of Conservation to Creationistic theories, than nothingness isn't truly nothingness, it is simply the opposite state of existence. Something always existed, it just changed form. Not sure if this makes sense (it almost doesn't make sense as I write it) but hey, I tried! sweatdrop

Not everybody believes in an ultimate creator either. So perhaps there isn't one? Can't ever know, though.

Evolution is fraud, many examples of evolution are fabricate ,and you don't need to know this to know biology books are trying to sell you s**t about this evolution. "were few insects that were not killed by an insecticide" They survived because it was already built into their D.N.A. in fact all changes in animals occurred because the instruction to do so is already built into their D.N.A.