|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:12 pm
I was disapointed in sonic x, mainly with the art. How could you turn something as cool as this>>>  To something as dinky as this>>>  ??? I just don't understand.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:39 pm
I really don't see what's so wrong; for the most part, the changes aren't THAT major.
Though, I do have a slight qualm with how Sonic's quills are portrayed at times; mainly from the back, where he's shown possessing only three, in a bit of a triangle formation.
But other than that, I have no gripes about the style. It's still heavily influenced by the Adventure art style, despite being injected with a bit more anime flair.
Besides, Sonic X seems to be the only way to see the Chaotix in that style (was anybody else disappointed with the lack of 2D artwork for Heroes?).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:30 am
To be honest, I find the SX style to be a hybrid of the pre-SA and SA styles: keeping the extra twiddly bits on the design like eye colour and greater definition, but ditching stuff like the cooler-than-thou bells and whistles on the shoes, and a so-called smile that could frighten small children. smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:50 am
Eh, its an animation, not a computer aided drawing.
Unless they want to go computer generated over the top still picture. I dont see anything wrong with it.
But then again, to me I'd just look at it and say "Sonic"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:03 am
Chris Kitmyth Eh, its an animation, not a computer aided drawing. To be fair, Chris: those're largely the same thing these days. There're very few studios left which don't use computers to colour and animate - although the line work itself is still the human touch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:06 am
*nod nod*
I was meaning more along the lines of, a still picture you can spend ages and ages on, in programs like photoshop and put in lots of different shading, filter effects and the like to enhance the still image.
If you're going to do that with an animation, its going to cost a LOT of money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:28 pm
Oh, I know it looks similiar, but the soni x looks more, I dunno, chubby? dinky? That's what I mean. in SA2B, he is all mature looking, like in the first pic, but the x takes him back to the SoA days...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:49 pm
the pictures are broken stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:52 pm
I personally don't find the Sonic X art all that bad. I've seen worse, trust me. The only thing I don't like to be honest is how they did Christopher and every-now-and-then the character facial expressions. That's just me, though.
Hey, at least Sonic doesn't look like he did when he first came out. Don't get me wrong, I liked how he looked. But, if they put him like that into Sonic X, you wonder when was the last time he had a good run or two. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:57 am
I love the artwork in it. I think it's nifty. ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
