|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 4:03 pm
ok stupid question but if dreams halls is in play does it mean I can play Szadak by discarding a infultrator, some one explained it to me a long time ago but I forgot
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 8:51 pm
Skunch sorrow89 Skunch ultimo What Lord said. But guys seriously, now we can play force of will pitching a blue card without losing one life! heart heart heart HOLY ********! You just busted FoW!!! its kinda busted on its own...plus by the time you get dream halls out your normally have nothing in your hand and if you do you ditch it before you can play a fow...normally you just play high casting cost creatures instead and win... Your Sarcas-o-meter sucks, you know that? its just a simple fact...ive been playing magic for a long time and im mainly a vintage player...fow losing one life is no big deal for all the threats that it gets rid of...and when you have that much mana out anything that cost more then that is just a waste most of the time...its not as effecient as it was when it first came out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 10:02 am
Enchanments are dangerous.
And flimsy.
Think Debtors Knell.
I love the card to death but it eats so much hate.
Smae for the halls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 11:09 am
sorrow89 Skunch sorrow89 Skunch ultimo What Lord said. But guys seriously, now we can play force of will pitching a blue card without losing one life! heart heart heart HOLY ********! You just busted FoW!!! its kinda busted on its own...plus by the time you get dream halls out your normally have nothing in your hand and if you do you ditch it before you can play a fow...normally you just play high casting cost creatures instead and win... Your Sarcas-o-meter sucks, you know that? its just a simple fact...ive been playing magic for a long time and im mainly a vintage player...fow losing one life is no big deal for all the threats that it gets rid of...and when you have that much mana out anything that cost more then that is just a waste most of the time...its not as effecient as it was when it first came out Did you even read my last post? I said I was being sarcastic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 6:33 pm
nope actually you said "your sarcas-o-meter sucks"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 12:09 pm
sorrow89 nope actually you said "your sarcas-o-meter sucks" Wow, you sure are literal. I was telling you that you are bad at telling if someone is being sarcastic hense: "your sarcas-o-meter sucks". Is that too hard? Or do I have to draw you a diagram?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 12:20 pm
Kenji_Minamori ok stupid question but if dreams halls is in play does it mean I can play Szadak by discarding a infultrator, some one explained it to me a long time ago but I forgot To play szadek with dream halls, you only need to discard a blue or black card. Remember, the oracle text for Dream Halls says Rather than pay the mana cost for a nonartifact spell, its controller may discard a card that shares a color with that spell. You could discard Infiltrator and play Szadek if you wanted though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 2:03 pm
Skunch sorrow89 nope actually you said "your sarcas-o-meter sucks" Wow, you sure are literal. I was telling you that you are bad at telling if someone is being sarcastic hense: "your sarcas-o-meter sucks". Is that too hard? Or do I have to draw you a diagram? diagrams do help...but the only thing is online you cant really tell because your reading it and your mind can percieve it in a different way then originally was intended since everyone has their own views and look at things differently
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 7:38 pm
sorrow89 Skunch sorrow89 nope actually you said "your sarcas-o-meter sucks" Wow, you sure are literal. I was telling you that you are bad at telling if someone is being sarcastic hense: "your sarcas-o-meter sucks". Is that too hard? Or do I have to draw you a diagram? diagrams do help...but the only thing is online you cant really tell because your reading it and your mind can percieve it in a different way then originally was intended since everyone has their own views and look at things differently 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 12:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:03 am
Skunch  (Oracle text: Rather than pay the mana cost for a nonartifact spell, its controller may discard a card that shares a color with that spell, X spells are 0.) What do you think? Busted? Maybe. Oh yeah, it combos with madness. wow thats complicated... rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:47 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:13 pm
One word:
Rakdos.
Make a blue-red-black Rakdos deck... Then it's worth playing with... whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:25 am
Just so everyone knows, Dream Halls allows ALL players to use its ability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
