|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:08 pm
 It's hard to see a real difference between pornography and prostitution other than perhaps the latter being more risky (random sex partners) and less accepted than than the other. Other than that, both involve promiscuity, both involve having sex for money, etc. etc. Debate Questions: I know there's currently a legal difference between porn and prostitution (one being criminal and the other not) depending on what country you live in, but is there a real moral difference? 
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:18 pm
 I don't think that there is a real moral difference at all. You are showing and selling your body off for person gain, it's all the same and quite frankly it's a sin, and a disgusting one at that. I see stripping, porn, prostitution, lingerie modeling, all of it is prostitution. You are selling off your body, your body is a temple you should treat it as such, and having sex for money, fame, ect is not treating it as such in my opinion. It breaks my heart to see people fall into this temptation. sad 
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:57 pm
Prostitution is legal in my country. I celebrate that, as its legality protects those involved in what is often a dangerous occupation. Prostitutes can now feel much more able to go to the police when they have been robbed, abused or raped. The industry is physically and medically safer for both prostitutes and clients.
I actually have no problem with either. If that's what someone wants to do, and if they're happy and in control of their careers and their lives, I celebrate their choice. I think to make that choice willingly is to treat one's body as a temple, albeit a temple perhaps to Aphrodite. But a temple nonetheless, and it is a beautiful thing to be alive in one's body. And what's so wrong about personal gain? We do it all the time in other ways - you sell yourself every day when you go to work. You sell your mind and your time and your body and sometimes your soul, depending on what you're doing.
Besides, elements of stripping, modelling and so on are blatantly art. (On that note, what are people's opinions of Amanda Palmer and the Grand Theft Orchestra's "Want it Back" video? It contains nudity, but it's non-sexual. Where does that leave it on this scale?)
So in short, no, I don't think there's a difference. I think they're both fantastic so long as the men and women involved are happy to be doing it, and my life is richer for the work of James Deen and Dita von Teese.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:26 pm
It's true that pornography and prostitution have many, many similarities. You can't receive money in exchange for sex unless that sex is being filmed. rolleyes
That being said, I don't think that making porn and prostitution lpillegal is going to do society any favours ultimately, regardless of whether it's morally correct or not.
Making something illegal is not going to stop people from doing it. Heroin is illegal in just about country on the planet, and yet millions of people still manage to be heroin addicts.
Making pron and prostitution illegal doesn't stop it from happening, especially with the invention of the internet. What making it illegal would do is to simply make such professions vastly more dangerous for everyone involved. The professional porn industry, sleazy though it may be, has loads of protection for the people in the films. Protection, regular STD screenings, and they can go to the police if they're being abused and not have to fear legal repercussions themselves, which is a huge reason why prostitutes, in places where it is illegal, do not feel that they can report cases of abuse while in their line of work.
I feel that a lot of people really automatically look down their noses at sex workers of all variety and forget that these people are human beings as much as you or me or anyone else. While some sex workers do genuinely enjoy their jobs...most don't. These aren't bad people. They're desperate people, many from childhood backgrounds of heinous abuse, they need money for food, they need money for their kid, and yes, many of tthem need money for booze or drugs, but take a moment to think what may have led them to needing the liquor or drugs in the first place.
Do these people really deserve to be locked up? They're meeting a demand that, like it or not, exists in our society. And for many of these people, for whatever reason, have no other choice or believe they have no other choice.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:14 am
porn and porn pics are both foul
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:04 am
NOTE: Content may not be suitable for underaged persons There's a site by Shelley Lubben who was a former pornstar and she (as well as many others who used to be in the business) speak up about the atrocities that happen to the "actors". Many of them have painful histories involving child abuse or sexual abuse, and a lot of the "talent" that goes through the doors into the industry are there because financially thy've fallen on hard times. I have to say after hearing about this it's hard to even laugh at a related joke. It's so sobering. Shelley also has another foundation I think, but I can't remember the name. It helps people in the business get out and people with related addictions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:03 am
I'm just going to leave this here...
Mathew 5, 27-28 27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’[e] 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
So yeah, in other words morally they are the same.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:38 pm
I'll admit, I do dabble in pornography. Along with that, I never have and never will have relations with anyone outside of an actual relationship. That's the closest I can relate to prostitution. Otherwise, it would never happen anyway. Morally I can see how the two are all but two figs on the same tree. The difference for me is in which actions I find acceptable. I do not cheat, or go out and retireve prostitues, because of social inbalance, etc. that it would cause. Granted, if it were pointed out how my viewing of pornography was a hindrance to others, or myself, I may very well not partake of it. But at present, it is a simple venue of pleasure and often a source of ideas. I mean, I understand how it is biblically wrong to do so, but I'm not a religious person, so it's hard to have those kind of convictions.
As far as the two being equally, morally wrong, that may just very well be perspective. My attunement to what is right and wrong is often reference based off of what is legal and illegal. There is room for conflict in this system where what I feel differs from what is legal, but I have to address those on a case by case basis.
On that thought process, is it not the same for christians? While trying to take the bible in whole as law, are some trials not questionable given all of its instructions?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:44 am
Sanguina Cruenta Prostitution is legal in my country. I celebrate that, as its legality protects those involved in what is often a dangerous occupation. Prostitutes can now feel much more able to go to the police when they have been robbed, abused or raped. The industry is physically and medically safer for both prostitutes and clients. I actually have no problem with either. If that's what someone wants to do, and if they're happy and in control of their careers and their lives, I celebrate their choice. I think to make that choice willingly is to treat one's body as a temple, albeit a temple perhaps to Aphrodite. But a temple nonetheless, and it is a beautiful thing to be alive in one's body. And what's so wrong about personal gain? We do it all the time in other ways - you sell yourself every day when you go to work. You sell your mind and your time and your body and sometimes your soul, depending on what you're doing. Besides, elements of stripping, modelling and so on are blatantly art. (On that note, what are people's opinions of Amanda Palmer and the Grand Theft Orchestra's "Want it Back" video? It contains nudity, but it's non-sexual. Where does that leave it on this scale?) So in short, no, I don't think there's a difference. I think they're both fantastic so long as the men and women involved are happy to be doing it, and my life is richer for the work of James Deen and Dita von Teese. "If merely doing what makes you happy was enough, we would have found the secret long ago." - G.K. Chesterton Forgive me for saying this, and I realize that this changes the course of the argument at hand, but I feel a true need to speak up here. Many sinful things make you happy, for a season. The Bible admits to this and speaks it quite clearly, but it also teaches us that "Joy is in the Lord." So whatever is not of the Lord no true joy, no true happiness is found. We shall never find happiness by looking for it, but in Christ it will be given abundantly. I must completely disagree with your statement and show that years of human history has proven that "doing what makes you happy" isn't the key to being happy and often times leaves us worse off than before.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:23 am
RyuShikyo Yagari I'm just going to leave this here... Mathew 5, 27-28 27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’[e] 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. So yeah, in other words morally they are the same. But what if the person is single, is she or he committing adultery with a imaginary friend?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:45 pm
Dawn Landers RyuShikyo Yagari I'm just going to leave this here... Mathew 5, 27-28 27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’[e] 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. So yeah, in other words morally they are the same. But what if the person is single, is she or he committing adultery with a imaginary friend? No. Unless your imaginary friend is the scandalous type. Then you're pretty much boned. Pun most definitely intended.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:50 pm
Dawn Landers RyuShikyo Yagari I'm just going to leave this here... Mathew 5, 27-28 27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’[e] 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. So yeah, in other words morally they are the same. But what if the person is single, is she or he committing adultery with a imaginary friend? Why should it be any different? If in a commited relationship looking at somebody lustfully counts as committing it in their hearts then why should it be any different for somebody single?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:16 pm
RyuShikyo Yagari Dawn Landers RyuShikyo Yagari I'm just going to leave this here... Mathew 5, 27-28 27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’[e] 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. So yeah, in other words morally they are the same. But what if the person is single, is she or he committing adultery with a imaginary friend? Why should it be any different? If in a commited relationship looking at somebody lustfully counts as committing it in their hearts then why should it be any different for somebody single? Well okay! I just thought people looking at folks and their single wouldnt conclude
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|