|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:16 am
thunderbirds....big fan biggrin
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:03 pm
LaFromboise thunderbirds....big fan biggrin thunderbirds are severely overpriced. just because the gibson name is on something, they think they can market it 1k+. Besides, Fender won the bass war.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:28 pm
sinis LaFromboise thunderbirds....big fan biggrin thunderbirds are severely overpriced. just because the gibson name is on something, they think they can market it 1k+. Besides, Fender won the bass war. But Warwicks have better paint schemes!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:12 pm
Chibo-Sensei Mozart_the_Dark_Jedi Chibo-Sensei Mozart_the_Dark_Jedi thats a Hofner 500/1 bass, '63 modle...its my favorite bass too.....And i cant afford the vintage modle they sell now so i bought Rogue's version. I'm saving for the rogue bass. It's $230. wow the price has gone up, i got mine for $199 Where did you get yours? musiciansfriend.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:01 pm
TheDarkMercenary sinis LaFromboise thunderbirds....big fan biggrin thunderbirds are severely overpriced. just because the gibson name is on something, they think they can market it 1k+. Besides, Fender won the bass war. But Warwicks have better paint schemes! I don't really prefer Fender over my ESP, I know it is a better quality and whatnot, but to me Fenders are a little too heavy and overrated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:07 pm
LaFromboise thunderbirds....big fan biggrin Even though I've never played one, I enjoy the sound and the look of the Thunderbird Studio 4-string
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:12 pm
And I absolutely love the Epiphone El Capitan 4-string acoustic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:21 pm
Black Jack Booted Demon TheDarkMercenary sinis LaFromboise thunderbirds....big fan biggrin thunderbirds are severely overpriced. just because the gibson name is on something, they think they can market it 1k+. Besides, Fender won the bass war. But Warwicks have better paint schemes! I don't really prefer Fender over my ESP, I know it is a better quality and whatnot, but to me Fenders are a little too heavy and overrated. Since when did Fender win the bass war? Fenders are versatile. They can play most music, but don't excel at anything. I'm a bluesy rocker, I prefer Warwicks. I have extreme metal friends. They do the whole ESP and B.C. Rich thing. Fender can do both, but not as well as the others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:30 pm
Aahz Black Jack Booted Demon TheDarkMercenary sinis LaFromboise thunderbirds....big fan biggrin thunderbirds are severely overpriced. just because the gibson name is on something, they think they can market it 1k+. Besides, Fender won the bass war. But Warwicks have better paint schemes! I don't really prefer Fender over my ESP, I know it is a better quality and whatnot, but to me Fenders are a little too heavy and overrated. Since when did Fender win the bass war? Fenders are versatile. They can play most music, but don't excel at anything. I'm a bluesy rocker, I prefer Warwicks. I have extreme metal friends. They do the whole ESP and B.C. Rich thing. Fender can do both, but not as well as the others. I love B.C. Rich guitars. I don't think their basses look good though. I play a B.C. Rich guitar (http://www.instrumentpro.co.uk/P-BCRBCSSKKVPK?source=froogle), but for playing metal bass I use my Warwick Vampyre. It looks cool and it still sounds rock hard! I agree Fenders are good all-rounders, but they just lack the punch of some of teh other basses!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:39 pm
Aahz Black Jack Booted Demon TheDarkMercenary sinis LaFromboise thunderbirds....big fan biggrin thunderbirds are severely overpriced. just because the gibson name is on something, they think they can market it 1k+. Besides, Fender won the bass war. But Warwicks have better paint schemes! I don't really prefer Fender over my ESP, I know it is a better quality and whatnot, but to me Fenders are a little too heavy and overrated. Since when did Fender win the bass war? Fenders are versatile. They can play most music, but don't excel at anything. I'm a bluesy rocker, I prefer Warwicks. I have extreme metal friends. They do the whole ESP and B.C. Rich thing. Fender can do both, but not as well as the others. Do you know the history of Fender and Gibson? They both competed with producing basses, but Gibson couldn't compete with the p-bass and the jazz bass and stuck to guitars. Same with Marshall; used to make bass amps but couldn't cut it. Now Epiphone does more with bass than Gibson (sacrificing quality, of course).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 10:29 am
Thundetr Bird and the earnie ball music mans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
