|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:29 am
If someone uses auto-hitting on your rpc, is it considered auto-dodging if you dodge the auto-hits or is it not considered auto-dodging?
A old classmate and me where arguing about that one since he regularly uses an auto-hit without my agreement on my rpc, which i let my rpc usually dodge. But like the question above stated, is dodging the auto-hits seen as auto-dodging or as normal dodging?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:55 am
Auto -dodging isn't particularly real, as it is the choice of the controlling RPer if the RPC is hit or not. The problem is when the RPC never gets hit, it isn't fun anymore and/or the RPC does things it can't. If the RPC is logically able to dodge then it is alright to have that occur.
Dodging an auto-hit is seen by some more irritated RPers as a sport. In general the practice of ignoring that another player said it hit (an auto-hit) is acceptable. Some take it a step further and have the RPC be amused by the auto-hitter's post-miss actions that assume hit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 3:26 pm
Well, Auto-hitting includes some puppet mastery according to the AMP guide. It isn't really going to be looked down upon if you evade an auto-hit especially if you use important details that the attacker left out.
For example, if the terrain isn't wide open, it's entirely possible to goof the auto-hitter by pointing out that he didn't notice there was a wall between him and you. After all, you don't have to dodge something that couldn't possibly hit you anyway. Then it isn't auto-dodging at all.
Now if Auto-hitting is used as a result of someone having a bitingly difficult time landing a hit on your character, it might be an issue with your character's defense choices in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
