|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 6:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 7:47 pm
Yup I knew it's better to squat and the toilet is actually bad. I didn't figure to think of it being a conspiracy though. *Puts his tin foil hat on*
It makes sense now!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 8:40 pm
if you believe that you're a god damned fool. When I was on the train from Beijing headed south, we had to use squat toilets for near two days. It was a living hell hanging onto a rail swinging into every turn trying to control your bowel movements while some chatterbox with a security guard close by pounded on the door.
The hypertechnology super toilets of Osaka were a god send. God bless the toilet man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 8:57 pm
Michael Noire if you believe that you're a god damned fool. When I was on the train from Beijing headed south, we had to use squat toilets for near two days. It was a living hell hanging onto a rail swinging into every turn trying to control your bowel movements while some chatterbox with a security guard close by pounded on the door. The hypertechnology super toilets of Osaka were a god send. God bless the toilet man. The squat is the natural way to do things. How would you go in the woods? You'd hold onto a tree and squat. It's more natural and more healthy to squat then sit. Now if there's a conspiracy about it is another case but I can't deny there is a possibility they did it knowing it can hurt us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 9:54 pm
You ever wonder if maybe the reason toilets are designed to sit on instead of squat on is because we're lazy ******** that don't want to put that much effort into pooping?
Besides, you can get the same effect by using a foot stool to prop your feet up a little while on the throne.
This same logic applies to straight-backed chairs; they're bad for our posture and such but we're slaves to convenience and comfort. I doubt there's a huge conspiracy with this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 10:01 pm
Obscurus You ever wonder if maybe the reason toilets are designed to sit on instead of squat on is because we're lazy ******** that don't want to put that much effort into pooping? Besides, you can get the same effect by using a foot stool to prop your feet up a little while on the throne. This same logic applies to straight-backed chairs; they're bad for our posture and such but we're slaves to convenience and comfort. I doubt there's a huge conspiracy with this. Oh come on we can have fun with this one. haha (Do you need to be Mr. Serious all the time?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 10:16 pm
Azkeel Obscurus You ever wonder if maybe the reason toilets are designed to sit on instead of squat on is because we're lazy ******** that don't want to put that much effort into pooping? Besides, you can get the same effect by using a foot stool to prop your feet up a little while on the throne. This same logic applies to straight-backed chairs; they're bad for our posture and such but we're slaves to convenience and comfort. I doubt there's a huge conspiracy with this. Oh come on we can have fun with this one. haha (Do you need to be Mr. Serious all the time?) Yes. Someone has to be. xd Really though, I see human laziness as the culprit rather than conspiracy to cause annoying health problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 10:20 pm
Obscurus Azkeel Obscurus You ever wonder if maybe the reason toilets are designed to sit on instead of squat on is because we're lazy ******** that don't want to put that much effort into pooping? Besides, you can get the same effect by using a foot stool to prop your feet up a little while on the throne. This same logic applies to straight-backed chairs; they're bad for our posture and such but we're slaves to convenience and comfort. I doubt there's a huge conspiracy with this. Oh come on we can have fun with this one. haha (Do you need to be Mr. Serious all the time?) Yes. Someone has to be. xd Really though, I see human laziness as the culprit rather than conspiracy to cause annoying health problems. Yes that is the most logical case! >.< I agree with you. But I also do believe it is unhealthy for us to sit rather then squat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 10:26 pm
Azkeel Obscurus Azkeel Obscurus You ever wonder if maybe the reason toilets are designed to sit on instead of squat on is because we're lazy ******** that don't want to put that much effort into pooping? Besides, you can get the same effect by using a foot stool to prop your feet up a little while on the throne. This same logic applies to straight-backed chairs; they're bad for our posture and such but we're slaves to convenience and comfort. I doubt there's a huge conspiracy with this. Oh come on we can have fun with this one. haha (Do you need to be Mr. Serious all the time?) Yes. Someone has to be. xd Really though, I see human laziness as the culprit rather than conspiracy to cause annoying health problems. Yes that is the most logical case! >.< I agree with you. But I also do believe it is unhealthy for us to sit rather then squat. I agree with you that it is healthier to squat than to sit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 1:23 pm
Obscurus I agree with you that it is healthier to squat than to sit. Everyone in agreement is a beautiful thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:27 am
this reminds me of the ricky lake pregnancy movie. I think it is healthier to piss standing than squatting or aiming, but urinals still aren't standard fair. If I had an illness, I would rather be sitting for 2 hours than squatting for two hours - which is hell on your knees.
Besides, if our ancestors didn't have toilets - which date back to at least 2800 BC, we must also remember the consequences of sanitation in terms of life span. I personally don't want to lose 50 years from my lifespan (and you thought cigarettes were bad) so I can have squat based gains of what? 2 years?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:44 am
Id be more worried on the chemicals related to the toilet. but we can have the best of the both. We can have our toilet with its ablity to rid our bile, and the proper posture, but if we get a stool and use it, might as well I already have one in my bathroom. but Ive noticed it is easier to go when useing the posture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:05 am
Azkeel Michael Noire if you believe that you're a god damned fool. When I was on the train from Beijing headed south, we had to use squat toilets for near two days. It was a living hell hanging onto a rail swinging into every turn trying to control your bowel movements while some chatterbox with a security guard close by pounded on the door. The hypertechnology super toilets of Osaka were a god send. God bless the toilet man. The squat is the natural way to do things. How would you go in the woods? You'd hold onto a tree and squat. It's more natural and more healthy to squat then sit. Now if there's a conspiracy about it is another case but I can't deny there is a possibility they did it knowing it can hurt us. Just because something is natural, does not make it healthy. In fact, the more natural your lifestyle is, the shorter your lifespan. Natural means no housing, no farms, no medication, nothing stationary. If you broke a leg as a cave person, you were dead. Yes if I were a cavewoman, I would have to squat to poop, but if I got sick, my family of wandering nomads would have left me to get eaten by a lion. I just don't understand the people who have this nature craze. Technology is what makes our life better. By the way, this article is bullshit. If you are sitting on a toilet, then your rectum is at a 90 degree angle to the ground as opposed to squatting which makes the a**s angled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
