|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:56 pm
kp606 Quote: But I don't have pictures of my grandfather's open chest showing lungs blown up to poster sizes and plastered on trucks. But some people don't mind the mistakes of their family being showcased. And some people are changed by these pictures. This is just your opinion, sorry but it has no backing. Seeing a withered lung from cancer makes me feel different about smoking, moreso then anything else. And if we hide the pictures, don't we just prove the point more that they are dignified people? Doesn't that make your side look bad? I agree that it's more of a matter of opinon, I've seen dead people before ( I saw a bad accident once and we stopped to get help) but I prefer not to though but in some cases it maybe nesscary. Yes in health class they should a pictures of people that had and died of lung cancer, the point was to show you the truth of what happens, not to flant it but or anything but use it as a warning or let people know that is what can happen. Same with abortion, to show people the truth of abortion and what happens (some maybe fake some may not be). I believe people should know the truth, exspecially if they planned on doing so they know what they may be getting into. The truth may not be pretty but since when was abortion or lung cancer ever pretty? I think it's wrong not to let people know. But doctors should be the ones to show what happens since they obviously know best but then they would be losing money, it is there job to preform surgeries and try to cure illnesses after all. If you don't like what happens maybe that's a sign you shouldn't do something you may regrate or think is wrong,dangerous,unhealthly,ect..umm?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:31 pm
Oh, and one more thing just because I forgot earlier..In response to the OP...
MADD and SADD most definatly use graphic images to get their message across. There is a program for highschoolers called "Fatal Choices, Shattered dreams" In which the simulate a car accident and the carnage involved. It's very graphic. And who knows, maybe it is getting it's message across.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:35 pm
Broorel Oh, and one more thing just because I forgot earlier..In response to the OP... MADD and SADD most definatly use graphic images to get their message across. There is a program for highschoolers called "Fatal Choices, Shattered dreams" In which the simulate a car accident and the carnage involved. It's very graphic. And who knows, maybe it is getting it's message across. They had something like that when I was in high school, they even had a mock funeral. Don't know how well it did getting the message across to others though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 5:48 pm
Mistress DragonFlame kp606 Quote: But I don't have pictures of my grandfather's open chest showing lungs blown up to poster sizes and plastered on trucks. But some people don't mind the mistakes of their family being showcased. And some people are changed by these pictures. This is just your opinion, sorry but it has no backing. Seeing a withered lung from cancer makes me feel different about smoking, moreso then anything else. And if we hide the pictures, don't we just prove the point more that they are dignified people? Doesn't that make your side look bad? It is better, as said my Mcphee, to win them over with logic, then it is by sympathy. I laugh at those pictures. Why? Because I'm a cold hearted, evil, spiteful little b***h. I have almost no sympathy for humans. Now, show me a mutalated animal and I'll be moved anyday. I would argue that prolifers, having made little progress with their constant logic attempts, have resorted to visual means to bypass the denial of some, who believe the rights of human offspring to be secondary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:55 am
Right, just like every pro-choice slogan is in existance because of failed progress.
Hell, the phrase "who decides, you decide" is an affront to logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 4:58 pm
Quote: Nethilia Wrote:
Anti abortioners clearly don't have the same respect for the so-called people they are fighting for. I'm not surprized if they see them as expendable soldiers in the war agaisnt choice to be paraded around and used against their will. Not all Pro-Life people use pictures. Some, like me, don't use them at all. Just because some do doesn't mean WE ALL DO. It's not that we don't respect them, it's just sometimes people want VISUAL evidence on something. I'm pretty sure that not ONLY do SOME Pro-Life people use I'm pretty sure that some other people do. Maybe like cops, lawyers, debators, and everyday people use some form of visual evidence about this issue and other cases where dead people are present. If you were a dead spirit and you saw your picture you would get mad. BUT, you only would if they were using it for somthing stupid. You wouldn'y get mad if they were defending you and making sure that what happend to you wont happen to anyone else. Would you be mad then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:16 pm
kp606 And if we hide the pictures, don't we just prove the point more that they are dignified people? Doesn't that make your side look bad? I wouldn't mind looking bad next to someone who made a dignified point. One action (or lack of an action) doesn't make one dignified, though. You'd have to consider other factors, which in this case would be the person's other actions on the issue. If this person had a habit of bombing clinics, he wouldn't be more dignified than the protestor outside with "fetus" pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
