The FN carries 15 rounds to the HK's 12 (a pitiful number for a gun that size)
The FN costs $600 to the HK's $2300
The FN is about the size of an
M9, the HK is about the size of an
M4The HK has a threaded barrel, which the FNP does not. The FNP-45 Tactical has it, at a $300 upgrade.
The FN Tactical has provisions for a Docter red-dot sight.
The FN uses a Mil-Std P1913 rails, the HK uses HK proprietary rails.
The HK has an extra .5" of barrel over the Tactical, almost an inch and a half on the standard.
The FN Tactical has raised sights to see over a suppressor.
The FN has two or three backstraps.
The FN is fully ambidextrous without any modification whatsoever.
FN Customer Service doesn't hate you with all the wrath of a million jilted Klansmen simply for being a civilian.
Basically what it boils down to is that the Mk. 23, compared to the FNP-45 Tactical, is ******** massive, fits next to nothing on its rail, holds three fewer rounds, and costs $1400 more. The FNP is the hands-down winner. It MIGHT be a competition if the Mk. 23 were an $800 gun, but it's not, it's three times that.