|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:17 am
As a Christian, what are your thoughts concerning a Florida Pastor's intentions to burn the Muslim's most Holy Book, the Quran? Does this act further Christianity or the American cause? Does this Pastor represent your views?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:27 am
I'm about as ambivalent as you can get.
Okay, legally, he's doing nothing wrong -- indeed, one could argue that what he's doing is no different from the decades that people in the Middle East have been burning our flag. And I have to respect anyone who's willing to act in a way that's not "politically correct".
On the other hand, it is one giant publicity stunt -- maybe that's not how it was originally envisioned, but that's ultimately what it's become, courtesy of the Internet. And I loathe publicity stunts that have no real substance.
My ultimate question is this: "why is this crap national news?" I recall a time when book- or record-burnings were considered passe. Yes, I know, there's at least one recorded instance in the Bible of people burning books ... these were people who'd turned away from their past, destroying things they'd once held dear. That, I understand. Unless this preacher is an ex-Muslim, then his stunt doesn't qualify.
But, of course, in this day and age ... you don't get your fifteen minutes of fame unless you're willing to do something outrageous. So the next schmuck to want fifteen minutes will be just as offensive, maybe more ... and the whole cycle will just get worse and worse. The only way to stop it ... or at least to slow it down ... is to stop yapping about it. Stop caring. If enough people stop reading the stories or clicking the links, maybe the media will start to get the message and talk about something worthwhile for a change.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:05 am
Dragonbait I'm about as ambivalent as you can get. Okay, legally, he's doing nothing wrong -- indeed, one could argue that what he's doing is no different from the decades that people in the Middle East have been burning our flag. And I have to respect anyone who's willing to act in a way that's not "politically correct". On the other hand, it is one giant publicity stunt -- maybe that's not how it was originally envisioned, but that's ultimately what it's become, courtesy of the Internet. And I loathe publicity stunts that have no real substance. My ultimate question is this: "why is this crap national news?" I recall a time when book- or record-burnings were considered passe. Yes, I know, there's at least one recorded instance in the Bible of people burning books ... these were people who'd turned away from their past, destroying things they'd once held dear. That, I understand. Unless this preacher is an ex-Muslim, then his stunt doesn't qualify. But, of course, in this day and age ... you don't get your fifteen minutes of fame unless you're willing to do something outrageous. So the next schmuck to want fifteen minutes will be just as offensive, maybe more ... and the whole cycle will just get worse and worse. The only way to stop it ... or at least to slow it down ... is to stop yapping about it. Stop caring. If enough people stop reading the stories or clicking the links, maybe the media will start to get the message and talk about something worthwhile for a change. I agree that it seems to be a publicity stunt. But since it has reached the mass media, are this man's actions endangering our men and women in combat? Are these senitiments (if not actions) representative of the Christian community as a whole? Are we Christians (as a collective group) being harmed or helped in a world view by these actions? Edmund Burke was quoted as saying "All it takes for evil to prevail is for a few good men to do nothing." Is this our call as Christians to do something, say something or take a stand?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:09 pm
Well it seems as though the man we thought was seeking publicity was possibly a legitimate voice crying in the wilderness. His idea to burn the Koran has been cancelled...in exchange he has seemingly won for the families of 9/11 the moving of the mosque in NY City.
However in spite of this Pastor saying this and the Imam Muhammad Musri of the Islamic Society of Central Florida confirming it those in NY are now saying that no such agreement was reached.
So the debate and discussion continues......
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:29 am
Deidra Diamonds I agree that it seems to be a publicity stunt. But since it has reached the mass media, are this man's actions endangering our men and women in combat? That, I can't comment on; unless someone posting here is actually living in the Middle East, where they can observe people's reactions firsthand (rather than believing what we're told by biased politicians and the biased media), I don't believe anyone could answer this accurately. I do believe that this can increase the "hatred of America", yes, but exactly how much ... I couldn't say. Quote: Are these senitiments (if not actions) representative of the Christian community as a whole? I don't know. Granted, I haven't researched this story in-depth, but I'm not immediately aware of too many people (outside of Gaia) who actually care about it (and most of those inside Gaia have taken a blatantly pro-Islam stance). Quote: Are we Christians (as a collective group) being harmed or helped in a world view by these actions? That would depend on how you define those words. I'm making up numbers for effect here, but ... probably 80% of people won't care, or will only look down on this preacher. They'll just go on with their lives. Another 10% will use it as fodder to talk about how backwards and messed up Christians are ... but these are the same folks who hate us already. Unfortunately, they're the loudest. Maybe 7% will call themselves Christians -- might actually be Christians -- but will respond with things like public Koran- readings, trying to "foster peace between the faiths" and other such nonsense. Sounds to me like sucking up to the Muslims, and using pretty words to cover it up. A final 3% will respect him and/or us for taking a visible stand against our enemies, rather than kowtowing to them the way we've been doing for years. These are the ones we might actually be able to reach. This might make Christianity unpopular ... I correct myself. This might add to the unpopularity Christianity already suffers ... but personally, I'd rather be right than popular. Quote: Edmund Burke was quoted as saying "All it takes for evil to prevail is for a few good men to do nothing." Is this our call as Christians to do something, say something or take a stand? "Doing nothing" is precisely what we (as Americans, and as Christians) have been doing for pretty much my entire life -- probably all of yours, too. In the last few years, a few people have finally realized that ignoring the problem has only made it worse -- and frankly, what this guy is doing (or, rather, was threatening to do) is among the mildest (and most reasonable) of possible responses. It kills no-one, harms no-one, but gets everyone's attention, and lets certain flag- and Bible-burning folks in the Middle East "know how it feels". Nicely played. Hmm ... doesn't the Bible say something about being involved in useless or foolish arguments? No, no, I'm not calling this thread useless or foolish, don't get me wrong. I'm thrilled to have any sort of discussion here. But in my opinion, this entire stunt is one giant "foolish argument".
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:45 pm
Personally, I'm sick of everyone bowing to all the Muslims around. Hussein only sticks up for Muslims, yet claims to be Christian himself (which his actions and word speak otherwise, if people would only pay attention). His entire administration and most of the media only talks about offending Muslims, but yet when the liberal agenda continues to succeed, it's ok because it only upsets the Christians. If only people would just recognize what Islam really is about instead of ignoring it, then things would be a little better. But instead, we're having to deal with the Enemy in two or more forms right now: Islam and liberals.
So I say, enough is enough. The pastor is not hurting anyone, and Muslims calling for the "Death of America, Death to Christians" only show who the real violent ones are.
And yes, it is a foolish argument because most people already hate America and the freedoms we have, and the liberals only want power any way they can get it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:11 am
I know he's not doing anything wrong legally, but I'm very disappointed with the whole church. Jesus pretty much said not to react with hate. Turn the other cheek, and whatnot.
I have to agree with Xiterrose, though. I can't wait until we develop alternative fuel so we don't have to bow and scrape to Islamic countries with oil anymore.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:02 am
Deidra Diamonds As a Christian, what are your thoughts concerning a Florida Pastor's intentions to burn the Muslim's most Holy Book, the Quran? Does this act further Christianity or the American cause? Does this Pastor represent your views? It's hypocrisy,religion is the icon of promoting law,peace and order not promoting hatred through symbolic actions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:08 am
eh...no..
true, legally he's not doing anything wrong but i still think it's condemnation..and i also agree with the publicity stunt..muslims, though not all of them, already hates Christians..so the act will actually stir up even more hatred...
and besides, how can we show the world that Christians are God's people and are people of love if such an act is commenced..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:40 am
I'm just curious ... and honest, I'm not trying to be facetious here ... do you think there's a lot of Muslims standing around Mecca telling the Bible-burners and flag-burners to knock it off?
I don't. Oh, sure, there's probably a few who dislike these demonstrations ... but I'd be surprised if there were a whole lot.
I'm not saying "turnabout is fair play" or anything like that. As I said, we put up with this kind of thing for decades, and as far as I know (without doing a whole lot of research, I admit), this is the only Koran-burning (so it can hardly be called "fair play"). I'm saying that I do believe certain groups should know how it feels to have their idolized items treated so rudely. Maybe, just maybe, they'd be less likely to do this sort of thing in the future.
Okay, yeah, that's wishful thinking, I admit; it requires humans to be reasonable, and we aren't.
A moot point, anyway, since the burning didn't happen. From what I'm told, somebody indeed did burn a Koran that day ... but not this preacher or his people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:24 am
Pretty sure some guy burned a few pages of it right in front of the mosque, which is grounds for arrest since it was on their property. He messed up. :p
Dragonbait, I think that's what separates us from Islamic countries. We don't resort to violent demonstrations when someone doesn't agree with us.
Slightly off-topic, I think the army should allow soldiers in Iraq to wear crosses and stars of David. Weren't we trying to set them up with a government that WOULDN'T enforce religious laws like that?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:07 pm
Stop Dont Believin Pretty sure some guy burned a few pages of it right in front of the mosque, which is grounds for arrest since it was on their property. He messed up. :p Oh, absolutely. That involves trespassing, which just adds injury to insult (no, that's not backwards). Yeah, he screwed up, definitely. If I were to burn ... oh, we'll say the Book of Mormon, since that's fairly easy to find ... in my own yard, big deal. If I were to announce it to the world, well, that'd be begging for attention (and probably quite a bit of flak from pretty much every religious group in existence), but still my business. If I were to do it in the local LDS parking lot, that'd be flat stupid. Quote: Dragonbait, I think that's what separates us from Islamic countries. We don't resort to violent demonstrations when someone doesn't agree with us. No offense intended, but I get the feeling you don't know much about recent American history. From the race riots of the Sixties to the PETA fiascos of the Nineties, we sure as blazes do "resort to violent demonstrations". And people call me 'Bait. It's easier. Quote: Slightly off-topic, I think the army should allow soldiers in Iraq to wear crosses and stars of David. Weren't we trying to set them up with a government that WOULDN'T enforce religious laws like that? Hmm ... I can see why the military would forbid wearing religious insignia (since that would make the wearer a target, and remind the locals of who exactly is walking around pointing guns). On the other hand, any American -- heck, any foreigner -- is automatically a target if they're walking around in a military uniform, and the US Flag most soldiers wear isn't a vast improvement. People who are determined to hate us just substitite "country" for "religion". So, yeah, I agree that soldiers/marines/whatever should be permitted to keep their religious items -- but from what I recall of my own military career, we were required to keep them under our uniforms. (Let me qualify that. I was a Chaplain's Assistant, so I kind of had to wear an appropriate badge on my dress uniforms. If I wanted to wear a cross with my BDUs, I had to stick it under my shirt where it wouldn't be seen.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:36 pm
In my Dad's day (WWII) they issued the soldiers Bibles.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:55 am
We weren't issued them (this being the early 90's), but there were Gideons passing them out at the beginning of Basic Training and AIT.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:47 am
Military personel are allowed to wear religious symbols, but like 'Bait said, they have to stay beneath our uniforms, and that has to do with uniformity, the military definition of profesionalism, and unit cohesion. I have seen first hand how bringing your religious preferences into the open while in uniform has nearly destroyed careers and gotten people into really stupid places they should never have been. It's ridiculous that people do things like that, but that doesn't change the fact that they do. We have enough enemies, we don't need to fight amongst ourselves also.
What I was taught was that when you are in the army (and on duty) you are green first, and everything else comes second - your profession, your religion, your politics, even your gender (that's a long story, but feel free to ask if you want to know how that works). I have heard senior officers express opinions that would have been extraordinarily inflamitory and even frightening to some of my buddies in training. It's unfortunate, but it makes me glad that the military is so strict about keeping these things to yourself while on duty - we might have lost an experienced officer, and/or a very promising, dedicated soldier if my buddy or someone from the media had heard what the officer had said. (Don't get me wrong - God comes first in my life, as He should for all christians. I believe He put me where I am and I believe one day He will call me out of here in one way or another. Some people just don't know how to control themselves.) There are other ways to show and share our faith - we don't need visible symbols and objects.
As for the original topic - I am generally inclined to agree with 'Bait and Xi' although I am disapointed in the whole event as well. I don't think it is a super mature or appropriate type of thing for christians to be doing (Yes I know it didn't actually end up happening, but it may as well have). It's not worth all the attention it got anyway. I think the best policy with things like this is to not fan the flames. The more attention something like this gets, the more the behaviors are being reinforced.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|