|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:51 pm
Fresnel Maddness91 i believe the replenish rate is far less than our usage rate... This is the central statement of your argument, and also shows your biggest flaw. ...i believe it because of sound reasoning which i'm trying to explain without having to make my own giant documentary xp ... it;s just like i believe there's life on other planets, and i believe we are all made of molecules... i've never seen these things, but sound reasoning from experts make very good arguments towards these things... if we're going to shoot down beliefs, then ur belief that water will always be around, is just as flawed... then we're both at an impass, and no one gets anywhere... neutral lets put it this way... you think there's like 0% chance that when we use a massive amount of water, and pollute and everything else... that we cannot run out... it;s imposable to use such an amount of water that the rate of replenishment can;t keep up? given the fact that coke bottling plants in india use a massive amount of water, that no one else gets any? given the fact that saudi arabia used such a massive amount that there wells almost ran dry? maybe i don;t understand your argument... so far i have "i see alot of water in my community, therefor there is enough water to go around if people want it" as ur main point... maybe it;s just me seeing this but to me, so far, that's a really flimsy argument
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:38 pm
Maddness91 Fresnel Maddness91 i believe the replenish rate is far less than our usage rate... This is the central statement of your argument, and also shows your biggest flaw. ...i believe it because of sound reasoning which i'm trying to explain without having to make my own giant documentary xp ... it;s just like i believe there's life on other planets, and i believe we are all made of molecules... i've never seen these things, but sound reasoning from experts make very good arguments towards these things... if we're going to shoot down beliefs, then ur belief that water will always be around, is just as flawed... then we're both at an impass, and no one gets anywhere... neutral lets put it this way... you think there's like 0% chance that when we use a massive amount of water, and pollute and everything else... that we cannot run out... it;s imposable to use such an amount of water that the rate of replenishment can;t keep up? given the fact that coke bottling plants in india use a massive amount of water, that no one else gets any? given the fact that saudi arabia used such a massive amount that there wells almost ran dry? maybe i don;t understand your argument... so far i have "i see alot of water in my community, therefor there is enough water to go around if people want it" as ur main point... maybe it;s just me seeing this but to me, so far, that's a really flimsy argument My argument is that water doesn't go anywhere. Coke bottles it, we drink it, we piss it out, and it gets reprocessed into water, whether naturally or manually. Water will always be there. We simply cannot pollute it to the point where it cannot be filtered out and made potable. And before you bring up the oil spill in the gulf, let it be known that the problem there isn't volume, it's surface area. The spill is just too damn BIG, we'd have to filter literally the entire ocean to clean it all that way, and so we have to find other methods. If we were drawing it in through a tube, we could filter it and drink the other end (salt content notwithstanding), but we can't filter the ocean we're pumping back into, that's picking up the bucket you're standing in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:40 am
Fresnel Maddness91 Fresnel Maddness91 i believe the replenish rate is far less than our usage rate... This is the central statement of your argument, and also shows your biggest flaw. ...i believe it because of sound reasoning which i'm trying to explain without having to make my own giant documentary xp ... it;s just like i believe there's life on other planets, and i believe we are all made of molecules... i've never seen these things, but sound reasoning from experts make very good arguments towards these things... if we're going to shoot down beliefs, then ur belief that water will always be around, is just as flawed... then we're both at an impass, and no one gets anywhere... neutral lets put it this way... you think there's like 0% chance that when we use a massive amount of water, and pollute and everything else... that we cannot run out... it;s imposable to use such an amount of water that the rate of replenishment can;t keep up? given the fact that coke bottling plants in india use a massive amount of water, that no one else gets any? given the fact that saudi arabia used such a massive amount that there wells almost ran dry? maybe i don;t understand your argument... so far i have "i see alot of water in my community, therefor there is enough water to go around if people want it" as ur main point... maybe it;s just me seeing this but to me, so far, that's a really flimsy argument My argument is that water doesn't go anywhere. Coke bottles it, we drink it, we piss it out, and it gets reprocessed into water, whether naturally or manually. Water will always be there. We simply cannot pollute it to the point where it cannot be filtered out and made potable. And before you bring up the oil spill in the gulf, let it be known that the problem there isn't volume, it's surface area. The spill is just too damn BIG, we'd have to filter literally the entire ocean to clean it all that way, and so we have to find other methods. If we were drawing it in through a tube, we could filter it and drink the other end (salt content notwithstanding), but we can't filter the ocean we're pumping back into, that's picking up the bucket you're standing in. your right, water doesn;t go anywhere... it just gets changed from drinkable to not drinkable... i.e. coke into piss... and guess who gets to drink the coke, and guess who gets to drink the piss confused and yeah oil spill isn't a massive deal in this context... oil is just an addition to the salt in terms of it's undrinkability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:10 am
Maddness91 Fresnel Maddness91 Fresnel Maddness91 i believe the replenish rate is far less than our usage rate... This is the central statement of your argument, and also shows your biggest flaw. ...i believe it because of sound reasoning which i'm trying to explain without having to make my own giant documentary xp ... it;s just like i believe there's life on other planets, and i believe we are all made of molecules... i've never seen these things, but sound reasoning from experts make very good arguments towards these things... if we're going to shoot down beliefs, then ur belief that water will always be around, is just as flawed... then we're both at an impass, and no one gets anywhere... neutral lets put it this way... you think there's like 0% chance that when we use a massive amount of water, and pollute and everything else... that we cannot run out... it;s imposable to use such an amount of water that the rate of replenishment can;t keep up? given the fact that coke bottling plants in india use a massive amount of water, that no one else gets any? given the fact that saudi arabia used such a massive amount that there wells almost ran dry? maybe i don;t understand your argument... so far i have "i see alot of water in my community, therefor there is enough water to go around if people want it" as ur main point... maybe it;s just me seeing this but to me, so far, that's a really flimsy argument My argument is that water doesn't go anywhere. Coke bottles it, we drink it, we piss it out, and it gets reprocessed into water, whether naturally or manually. Water will always be there. We simply cannot pollute it to the point where it cannot be filtered out and made potable. And before you bring up the oil spill in the gulf, let it be known that the problem there isn't volume, it's surface area. The spill is just too damn BIG, we'd have to filter literally the entire ocean to clean it all that way, and so we have to find other methods. If we were drawing it in through a tube, we could filter it and drink the other end (salt content notwithstanding), but we can't filter the ocean we're pumping back into, that's picking up the bucket you're standing in. your right, water doesn;t go anywhere... it just gets changed from drinkable to not drinkable... i.e. coke into piss... and guess who gets to drink the coke, and guess who gets to drink the piss confused and yeah oil spill isn't a massive deal in this context... oil is just an addition to the salt in terms of it's undrinkability I think you forget that we have water reclamation facilities that turn piss into water all day every day. Reclaimed water is no different from regular water, it's just a little bit flat. Well, I mean that if someone dumped a barrel of crude oil into a town's reservoir, for instance, it'd have more impact on the local climate than it would on the drinkability of the town's water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:09 pm
Fresnel Maddness91 Fresnel Maddness91 Fresnel Maddness91 i believe the replenish rate is far less than our usage rate... This is the central statement of your argument, and also shows your biggest flaw. ...i believe it because of sound reasoning which i'm trying to explain without having to make my own giant documentary xp ... it;s just like i believe there's life on other planets, and i believe we are all made of molecules... i've never seen these things, but sound reasoning from experts make very good arguments towards these things... if we're going to shoot down beliefs, then ur belief that water will always be around, is just as flawed... then we're both at an impass, and no one gets anywhere... neutral lets put it this way... you think there's like 0% chance that when we use a massive amount of water, and pollute and everything else... that we cannot run out... it;s imposable to use such an amount of water that the rate of replenishment can;t keep up? given the fact that coke bottling plants in india use a massive amount of water, that no one else gets any? given the fact that saudi arabia used such a massive amount that there wells almost ran dry? maybe i don;t understand your argument... so far i have "i see alot of water in my community, therefor there is enough water to go around if people want it" as ur main point... maybe it;s just me seeing this but to me, so far, that's a really flimsy argument My argument is that water doesn't go anywhere. Coke bottles it, we drink it, we piss it out, and it gets reprocessed into water, whether naturally or manually. Water will always be there. We simply cannot pollute it to the point where it cannot be filtered out and made potable. And before you bring up the oil spill in the gulf, let it be known that the problem there isn't volume, it's surface area. The spill is just too damn BIG, we'd have to filter literally the entire ocean to clean it all that way, and so we have to find other methods. If we were drawing it in through a tube, we could filter it and drink the other end (salt content notwithstanding), but we can't filter the ocean we're pumping back into, that's picking up the bucket you're standing in. your right, water doesn;t go anywhere... it just gets changed from drinkable to not drinkable... i.e. coke into piss... and guess who gets to drink the coke, and guess who gets to drink the piss confused and yeah oil spill isn't a massive deal in this context... oil is just an addition to the salt in terms of it's undrinkability I think you forget that we have water reclamation facilities that turn piss into water all day every day. Reclaimed water is no different from regular water, it's just a little bit flat. Well, I mean that if someone dumped a barrel of crude oil into a town's reservoir, for instance, it'd have more impact on the local climate than it would on the drinkability of the town's water. "we" may have them... alot more than "us" don't... 2 year old storyif ur coastal states are struggling in summer times, how do u think ur middle American states are going to fair if we Canucks decide to stop pumping water into Nebraska and Colorado? the Ogallala Aquifer is already being used 7-8 tims it's capacity to the oil spill it affects to many other things to be labeled a water hazard... industry, environment, travel, real estate... u've seen it... shouldn;t need any explaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:08 am
If I cannot buy my awesome water saving showerhead, I'll just take a longer shower.
Honestly, if I pay my water bill, the federal government has NO right to tell me how I use that water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
