|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:17 am
This is probably the worst decktype ever built by human hands, but you know what? I built it and I'm putting it on display.
Deck: 40
Monsters: 14
Arcana Force 0 - The Fool x3
Magical Merchant x3
Marshmallon x1
Nova Summoner x3
Sangan x1
Shining Angel x3
Spells: 13
Final Countdown x3
Spirit Message I x2
Spirit Message N x2
Spirit Message A x2
Spirit Message L x2
Card Trader x2
Traps: 13
Dark Bribe x3
Destiny Board x2
Dimensional Prison x3
Magic Cylinder x1
Mirror Force x1
Starlight Road x2
The Transmigration Prophecy x1
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:26 am
Monsters: x20
Golden Ladybug x3
Zero Guardna x3
Battle Fader x3
Magical Merchant x3
Marshmallon
Spirit Reaper
Arcana Force 0 - The Fool x3
Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter x3
Spells: x11
Final Countdown x3
Level Limit Area B
Messneger of Peace x3
Swords of Reveiling Light
Nightmare's Steel Cage x3
Traps: x11
Rainbow Life x3
Mirror Force
Torrential Tribute
Negate Attack x3
Threatening Roar x3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:39 am
axean Monsters: x20 Golden Ladybug x3 Zero Guardna x3 Battle Fader x3 Magical Merchant x3 Marshmallon Spirit Reaper Arcana Force 0 - The Fool x3 Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter x3 Spells: x11 Final Countdown x3 Level Limit Area B Messneger of Peace x3 Swords of Reveiling Light Nightmare's Steel Cage x3 Traps: x11 Rainbow Life x3 Mirror Force Torrential Tribute Negate Attack x3 Threatening Roar x3 The decktype's supposed to utilize both Final Countdown AND Destiny Board, so while yout build is better, it strays a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:00 pm
Hakuro de Killer The deck type's supposed to utilize both Final Countdown AND Destiny Board, so while your build is better, it strays a bit. At the same time, Destiny Board only works if the cards are played in the order of F-I-N-A-L. If you have your Final countdown in any of those spots you only have enough room for FAIL because that's what will happen. Point is: One or the other. It's not hard, and The better choice is probably Destiny Board as it takes a minimum of 5 turns (6 if you include setting DB on your first turn) while Final Countdown takes a minimum of 20 turns, and even low tier decks can end a duel or destroy your back row in less than 20 turns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:37 pm
Aka_Saiyaku Hakuro de Killer The deck type's supposed to utilize both Final Countdown AND Destiny Board, so while your build is better, it strays a bit. At the same time, Destiny Board only works if the cards are played in the order of F-I-N-A-L. If you have your Final countdown in any of those spots you only have enough room for FAIL because that's what will happen. Point is: One or the other. It's not hard, and The better choice is probably Destiny Board as it takes a minimum of 5 turns (6 if you include setting DB on your first turn) while Final Countdown takes a minimum of 20 turns, and even low tier decks can end a duel or destroy your back row in less than 20 turns. sorry dude, you have failed. final countdown does not stay on the field. OP: i built a stall deck like this before. but it was more of a joke deck. i had 2x spirit message A, 1x of N, and 1x of L. so i ended up spelling A-N-A-L. people i faced actually conceded because it was just too funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:52 am
This is, absolutely, the worst, WORST deck I've ever seen.
Destiny Board is completely trash.
Final Countdown is good only in the respect that Konami has released so much support for stall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:13 pm
Grumpy Paradox This is, absolutely, the worst, WORST deck I've ever seen. Destiny Board is completely trash. Final Countdown is good only in the respect that Konami has released so much support for stall. I appreciate your acknowledgment of my opening statement, though surely it can't be the worst DECK you've ever seen. You must have seen decks whose entire composition is made up of nothing but one-ofs, half are weak vanilla monsters like Master Kyonshee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:46 am
Basing the strength of a deck on the number of "one-ofs" = bad player.
Also, those are still better than this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:13 pm
Grumpy Paradox Basing the strength of a deck on the number of "one-ofs" = bad player. Also, those are still better than this. So you're saying that rookie "I wanna use one copy of every card so I have a lot of options" decks are better than this merely because of the spells I'm using? I'm not saying a deck with any number of one-ofs is bad, so long as the one-ofs are of cards that are on the Limited list. Look at it this way. Ignore the entire spell list as well as the Destiny Board in the Traps section. Then tell me it's worse than a one-of deck. I think the sheer level of stall synergy in the monsters as well as the control synergy in the traps more than makes up for the lack of legitimate spells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:08 pm
Actually, I've seen two decks far worse than this.
My first "deck" (60+ crappy cards and low-level fusions...
...in the deck, not in the extra deck) really sucked.
And then I learned.
And someone at my locals (Yeah yeah, I know) had something similar card number-wise,
and it was terrible, for someone who knows the game.
(Think of multiple structure decks.
Now shove them together.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:09 pm
Hakuro de Killer Grumpy Paradox Basing the strength of a deck on the number of "one-ofs" = bad player. Also, those are still better than this. So you're saying that rookie "I wanna use one copy of every card so I have a lot of options" decks are better than this merely because of the spells I'm using? I'm not saying a deck with any number of one-ofs is bad, so long as the one-ofs are of cards that are on the Limited list. Look at it this way. Ignore the entire spell list as well as the Destiny Board in the Traps section. Then tell me it's worse than a one-of deck. I think the sheer level of stall synergy in the monsters as well as the control synergy in the traps more than makes up for the lack of legitimate spells. It's worse. There, done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
