|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 12:17 pm
Well we have a super secret new project coming up for the guild and I want all of your opinions on the format for a part of it. Part of the project will be a bunch of deck list and I want to know if you like this style, want more information; and what kind, and anything else you want changed....
Deck name: Black-Hero Control
Example deck-
Blackwing Shura The Blue Flame x3
Blackwing Kalut The Moon Shadow x3
Elemental Hero Neo Alius x3
Cyber Dragon x2
Blackwing Blizzard The Far North x2
Honest x2
Gorz The Emissary of Darkness x1
Chaos Sorcerer x1
Elemental Hero Stratos x1
Blackwing Gale The Whirlwind x1
Blackwing Mistral The Silver Shield x1
Black Whirlwind x2
Gemini Spark x2
Allure of Darkness x1
Reinforcement of The Army x1
Brain Control x1
Mind Control x1
Pot of Avarice x1
Heavy Storm x1
Icarus Attack x2
Hero Blast x2
Starlight Road x2
Trap Dustshoot x1
Mirror Force x1
Solemn Judgment x1
Torrential Tribute x1
Extra Deck:
X-Saber Wayne x1
AOJ Catastor x1
Brionic Dragon of The Ice Barrier x1
Blackwing Armed Wing x1
Goyo Guardian x1
Ancient Fairy Dragon x1
Black Rose Dragon x1
Blackwing Armor Master x2
Stardust Dragon x2
Colossal Fighter x1
Red Dragon Archfiend x1
Infernity doom Dragon x1
Mist Wurm x1
Side Decking options:
Blackwing deck swap.
Hero Support.
DAD.
Ect.
Play style-
Black-Hero Control runs on a duel body concept to maximize plus ones and control the game. The Deck is split between a Blackwing and Elemental Hero body with light support. A Blackwing body does most of the works heavy lifting through battle. It also provides tuner for synchro. Black Whirlwind and Shura The Blue Flame provide deck thinking allowing the Hero half to be drawn more often; moreover Icarus attack provides great tempo control on a 2:2 scale as opposed to the Hero halves 1:1's. The Hero side of the deck offers fourth the classic Neo Alius beat backed by honest. Elemental Hero Neo Alius also has great synergy with both Gemini Spark and Hero Blast. Gemini Spark provides both destruction and draw, while Hero Blast gives the deck recursion of it's 1900 beatstick and monster destruction. Plus ones can also be gained through the chaining of Icarus Attack, Gemini Spark, and Hero Blast.
Strengths-
1. Despite the inclusion of two archetypes the deck has high synergy.
2. Highly controlling of the game state.
3. Can side deck more support for either theme.
4. Generates card advantage when chaining.
Weaknesses-
1. Opening hands will on occasion be wrong support for monsters present.
2. Royal Oppression can kill the deck.
3. Trap negation locks down half of the decks control.
This is just a first try I'll fix it up as you all give input.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:34 pm
Anata wa watashi ga zutto mae ni "sayounara" to yutta hito wo omoidasaseru.
Perhaps, while this does not directly help the format, supply decklists for newer players who might be wary about dropping hundreds of dollars on a hobby.
As for the formatting, I see no problems with it.
You remind me of someone I said goodbye to a long time ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:59 pm
Pheso Anata wa watashi ga zutto mae ni "sayounara" to yutta hito wo omoidasaseru.
Perhaps, while this does not directly help the format, supply decklists for newer players who might be wary about dropping hundreds of dollars on a hobby.
As for the formatting, I see no problems with it.
You remind me of someone I said goodbye to a long time ago. Yep I'll be trying to head up a structure deck based thing. Alright, anything you'd like added?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:38 am
Maybe an estimated cost of the total deck so people know if it's in their price range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jevan R. H. Divinitive Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:13 am
Personally, I think the format is rather... out-of-order.
I think it should be like this:
Name of deck:
Deck size:
Number of Monsters in deck:
Monster List
Number of Spells in deck:
Spell List
Number of Traps in deck:
Trap List
Number of cards in Extra Deck:
Extra Deck List
Number of Cards in Side Deck
Side Deck List
Deck Strategy
Other info about the deck
---
This way, I can see the deck first and it's not bogged by a wall of text that I probably wouldn't care reading before the decklist, especially seeing as having the decklist first would allow the Deck Strategy to make more sense to the reader.
As for pricing information for the deck... don't. It's too much information for an amateur and already known information for a pro.
Finally, I think adding a "Level of Difficulty" category would be a good idea. Meaning, how simple is it to pick up and play? Not how good the deck is, mind you, but just saying. Something like Dark World would be harder to play than something like, say... Vanilla Beatdown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:34 pm
Hakuro de Killer Personally, I think the format is rather... out-of-order. I think it should be like this: Name of deck: Deck size: Number of Monsters in deck: Monster List Number of Spells in deck: Spell List Number of Traps in deck: Trap List Number of cards in Extra Deck: Extra Deck List Number of Cards in Side Deck Side Deck List Deck Strategy Other info about the deck --- This way, I can see the deck first and it's not bogged by a wall of text that I probably wouldn't care reading before the decklist, especially seeing as having the decklist first would allow the Deck Strategy to make more sense to the reader. As for pricing information for the deck... don't. It's too much information for an amateur and already known information for a pro. Finally, I think adding a "Level of Difficulty" category would be a good idea. Meaning, how simple is it to pick up and play? Not how good the deck is, mind you, but just saying. Something like Dark World would be harder to play than something like, say... Vanilla Beatdown. Look better that way? Pricing is up for consideration, as even if people know prices sometimes it's nice to just have it right in front of you. There will be a tier list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jevan R. H. Divinitive Crew
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:39 am
How about expanding the Side Deck part a little to include when to side in these cards and what to take out for them.
For example
Dark Armed Dragon >>> Cyber Dragon [Stall, Gladiator Beast, Hero]
These are just random cards and decks to give a basic idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:25 pm
Jevan R. H. Divinitive How about expanding the Side Deck part a little to include when to side in these cards and what to take out for them. For example Dark Armed Dragon >>> Cyber Dragon [Stall, Gladiator Beast, Hero] These are just random cards and decks to give a basic idea. Yeah I was planning too, just didn't here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
