4shi
Aakosir
4shi
Eltanin Sadachbia
A full out hysterectomy isn't necessary, a simple tubal would be all that was needed to keep her from having kids...
Just because a law isn't on the books, doesn't mean it shouldn't be. Just because laws are on the books doesn't mean it should be, either.
I don't think that having children is a right. I think it's a responsibility. People who do not live up to their responsibilities get them taken away. If a driver violates their responsibilities behind the wheel, then they get their license taken. I think having kids is more serious than driving, but that's my opinion.
If having kids was a basic human right, then SS wouldn't be able to go in and take kids away from parents who were mistreating or neglecting them.
If a woman is going to continually be getting pregnant, and then aborting, pawning off, or neglecting her children, then she doesn't have any reason to be fertile in the first place. She is a drain on the system, and a danger to herself and the children she produces.
Just because a law isn't on the books, doesn't mean it shouldn't be. Just because laws are on the books doesn't mean it should be, either.
I don't think that having children is a right. I think it's a responsibility. People who do not live up to their responsibilities get them taken away. If a driver violates their responsibilities behind the wheel, then they get their license taken. I think having kids is more serious than driving, but that's my opinion.
If having kids was a basic human right, then SS wouldn't be able to go in and take kids away from parents who were mistreating or neglecting them.
If a woman is going to continually be getting pregnant, and then aborting, pawning off, or neglecting her children, then she doesn't have any reason to be fertile in the first place. She is a drain on the system, and a danger to herself and the children she produces.
While I agree her fertility isn't a right, her body is considered her property. She has a right to her property. If I recall correctly it's part of the grounds for legal abortion.
True, but I think you would be able to convince women like this to go through with tube tying. I mean seriously, do you want to keep popping babies out every 9 months only to have them taken away???
The issue is about sterilization, not about if it's ok to keep popping out babies. You made no indication the issue was convincing her of anything outside of a possible court order (your premise for the debate is too vague to make heads or tails of much). Moreover convincing an individual of sterilization is a far cry from reasonable proof for compulsory sterilization. So the issue is if it's ethical to force sterilization and does the state have a right to make someone stop reproducing.
I don't know what the situation is. I'm not sure if my sister even knows. And my point about having so many kids is that it is not fair to the kids.
