rmcdra
lavender opheliac
...
How would they get the little fetus out?
They'd have to perform major surgery, like a C-Section, and cut the baby out and then immediately get it into a safe plastic place...
which, by the way, does not exist. =/ not for a fetus that young anyway, even before it's an official fetus, but a cell...
I just don't think it'd work, not because of the cultural understanding of abortions, but because of the risks that are still involved.
Abortions are kinda...easy. They are. Okay, they cost enough, but it's a one time operation and while there is pain involved, it doesn't last too long and the whole thing, is just physically not - so - bad.
To get this baby out alive, when the mother doesn't want it, now that's going to be pretty hard on the mother herself, because she will be in the hospital for days after the surgery and she will have to fight possible infection..
Abotions are just EASY, you see?
Besides, what you're talking about, I see absolutely no major difference from that than of adoption. That baby is STILL going to be alive somewhere - and that's a major reason why women chose abortion, is because they just want to forget about the "problem", but when adoption or your idea is concerned, that baby is still out there somewhere...
and what if IT tries to find the mother?
-shakes head.-
no no no.
How would they get the little fetus out?
They'd have to perform major surgery, like a C-Section, and cut the baby out and then immediately get it into a safe plastic place...
which, by the way, does not exist. =/ not for a fetus that young anyway, even before it's an official fetus, but a cell...
I just don't think it'd work, not because of the cultural understanding of abortions, but because of the risks that are still involved.
Abortions are kinda...easy. They are. Okay, they cost enough, but it's a one time operation and while there is pain involved, it doesn't last too long and the whole thing, is just physically not - so - bad.
To get this baby out alive, when the mother doesn't want it, now that's going to be pretty hard on the mother herself, because she will be in the hospital for days after the surgery and she will have to fight possible infection..
Abotions are just EASY, you see?
Besides, what you're talking about, I see absolutely no major difference from that than of adoption. That baby is STILL going to be alive somewhere - and that's a major reason why women chose abortion, is because they just want to forget about the "problem", but when adoption or your idea is concerned, that baby is still out there somewhere...
and what if IT tries to find the mother?
-shakes head.-
no no no.
So because the mother wants to just "forget about it" this idea should not be pursued? I was under the impression that most women get abortions because they are choosing not to be pregnant. If this became a viable option it would do just that.
Your comment also seems to imply that you are against women having a choice. Some women don't want to have an abortion but they don't want to go through pregnancy. So rather than researching this avenue you seem to imply that you wish to deny women of this potential option and force them to chose between pregnancy or abortion. Aren't you quite the forward thinker?
There is no need to get rude, dearie.
I am very pro-choice, I just personally do not agree with our idea. That is all.
I am very pro-choice, I just personally do not agree with our idea. That is all.
