|
|
| Do you eat meat? |
| Yes |
|
65% |
[ 117 ] |
| No |
|
34% |
[ 62 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 8:02 pm
davidm843 Chieftain Twilight in this moment, david, i would give you a good interupting smack on the back of the head. i find that gets people's attention pretty well. i have to ask, do you realy find it nessesary to present yourself this way? if you feel so certain that you know what's right, than that's fine. but you cannot go about telling people how wrong they are based on your own belief and not expect them to fight you instead of just back down and accept your words. you put some of us on the defensive. i don't think how canon what you said was or wasn't was the point. it was obvious that he is trying to show you how you are coming across to other people, and why some of us (like myself for an obvious example) are beginning to think that it is no use talking to you. i for one a not in this guild for one-sided conversations. i'd like to learn from others, but i'd appreciate them having an open mind as well, or the very least that those i talk to can live-and-let-live. you don't have to agree with me, but please don't put me down like that. i don't have alot of love for fundamentalists in general, and i absolutely HATE elitists. and that is not a word i use lightly. Why do you get so angry at having the Buddha's teachings explained to you? You are, after all, in a Buddhist guild. If you find the teachings so unpalatable, there are other forums and guilds designed for other forms of spirituality. I don't presume to comment on religious topics on which I know nothing, and if my information is erroneous, I am grateful to be directed to the correct info. I guess other people expect whatever misinformation they spout to be accepted without question. i'm not angry about having the teachings explained to me. when Byaggha explains it to me and shares the sources she finds with me, i am overjoyed! biggrin the difference is that i don't like being treated as though i have no credibility, or that i am somehow "wrong" to believe what i believe. i don't realy care if you think that of me, but it's the way you say it that bothers me. like you think i'm some kind of monster. i realy just find myself very irritated with your elitism.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 8:50 pm
Chieftain Twilight davidm843 i'm not angry about having the teachings explained to me. when Byaggha explains it to me and shares the sources she finds with me, i am overjoyed! biggrin the difference is that i don't like being treated as though i have no credibility, or that i am somehow "wrong" to believe what i believe. i don't realy care if you think that of me, but it's the way you say it that bothers me. like you think i'm some kind of monster. i realy just find myself very irritated with your elitism. YOU are the one who wants to "smack" me in the head. YOU are the one hurling names at me (elitist, jerk, etc), and yet you think I think of you as a monster??!!! eek I really don't see how you're coming up with this. Are you reading what I'm posting, or are you just imagining stuff to respond to?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 9:13 pm
davidm843 Chieftain Twilight davidm843 i'm not angry about having the teachings explained to me. when Byaggha explains it to me and shares the sources she finds with me, i am overjoyed! biggrin the difference is that i don't like being treated as though i have no credibility, or that i am somehow "wrong" to believe what i believe. i don't realy care if you think that of me, but it's the way you say it that bothers me. like you think i'm some kind of monster. i realy just find myself very irritated with your elitism. YOU are the one who wants to "smack" me in the head. YOU are the one hurling names at me (elitist, jerk, etc), and yet you think I think of you as a monster??!!! eek I really don't see how you're coming up with this. Are you reading what I'm posting, or are you just imagining stuff to respond to? i could now ask the same questions of you, and quote accusations you made at me. this is an endless and pointless circular argument, and it's not getting anywhere. please, just leave me alone now david, i asked earlier if we could agree to disagree and you completely ignored that. i have nothing more to say.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:37 am
Akanishi Makoto I was a vegetarian. How it pertains to Buddhism is that all things carry the same essence that we do, and that to eat another "living being" such as an animal, is to destroy that essence and that volition. The inherent problem is that plants are also alive, so although they are not conscious, they are not without volition. I know almost for fact that the Buddha Shakyamuni allowed all of his disciples to eat meat if it was offered to them, as long as the meat and the offering met certain criteria. 1 - the animal could not have been slaughtered primarily for the monks consumption, 2 - the monks could not witness the slaughter or 3 - hear the cries of the animal during the killing. So, considering that Shakyamuni allowed it for his monks, then it would be OK for many of us to eat. Now, exactly how should we approach meat? I, for one, will not order anything containing meat. I will not purchase any meat or meat products in the supermarket. That meat is slaughtered almost exclusively for someone's consumption, and by virtue of me buying it, it becomes an animal slaughtered exclusively for my consumption. I am not a monk, by the way, but I live to the precepts. Anyway - I will eat what is offered to me at a meal either with family or with friends. Even if it's ordered by them for me, then that's fine, but I will not actively persue meat. On the other end of the spectrum - strict vegetarians are subject to one of the three poisons, aversion, because they actively avoid the meat. The whole point is to be passive and compassionate. That's our ultimate goal in all actions, so we need to remember these things when we make even the smallest decision. This is the most intelligent thing I have ever heard anyone say on vegetarianism, ever. I came to all of those conclusions a while back when I was trying to be vegan, under a roof with an omnivorous family. Now I don't seek meat out to buy for myself in a store or restaurant, but since I don't like being picky, having ocd feelings, or the feeling of aversion that comes from living in a home that cooks meat and asks me to have some - I'll eat it occasionally.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:19 am
I'm still trying to work through the whole vegetarian thing(as in figure out if its necessary to me or not), maybe when I have time I'll read through this whole thread so I can get more views from other people on it!
I eat meat on occasion, although normally only when I feel my body needs it (I wouldnt really be able to afford it otherwise anyway.) I kind of think its natural for us to eat and need meat every now and then, I think our bodies need those vitamins etc. that you get in meat sometimes. My Mum told me not long ago that my Dad used to be a vegan, and apparently when me and my sister were kids we were not as healthy as we should've been because our bodies werent getting whatever it is you get from meat to help us grow a bit more. Our Dad stopped being a vegan just for us! 0_o
I'd say I'm still mindful in spite of eating meat though. I wont eat meat unless its free range. I think its ok to eat an animal if its had a good life/been treated with respect.
As I said before though, I'm not completely certain on the subject, since many people oppose the idea. My friend thinks its stupid that I would treat any other animal with the same respect as a human, but will still eat animals.
But I guess my argument to that is that I think you can still eat an animal and respect it's life... there's the idea that of course we can all help each other out in this world, maybe animals are sometimes helping us by being a meal for us? I do wonder though, if I was faced in a situation where I had to risk my LIFE so that another animal would live, would I do it? Maybe if I couldn't, I should eat my words instead of meat!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:29 pm
I'm a vegetarian for now, mostly because I've found that since I stopped eating meat I've become calmer and a lot more mindful of what I eat. I've been warned that because of my projected work goals (touring electrician) I'll have to eat what the company provides for me, and it may not always be veggie friendly, and I've come to terms with that and I'll face it without objection, food is food.
Usually when I'm traveling I end up eating beef at some point just because I can't find options for myself to eat, and my friend gets annoyed with me because I become either very tired or very cross with people, which is no fun when you're at a conference.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:05 pm
It's good to see threads that last for years without going defunct. smile Sometimes I get the impression that internet forums are producing a form of ADD in the masses.
What do I have to say on vegetarianism? Hum. Well I eat meat. I eat a wide variety of things. My understanding of human biology tells me that my species is largely omnivorous. We have forward-facing eyes and bi-focal vision, comparatively short and small intestinal tracts, a single stomach, a variety of different kinds of teeth, and many other reasons. I accept this reality.
I am aware of people who become ill from eating meat, or dairy, or eggs, or fish, and other animal products. I am also aware of people who, if they do not consume meat, become ill, even deathly so. I accept the reality that not all members of my species have the same nutritional needs.
At our level of sentience, we are capable of choosing what we eat for reasons other than the nutritional. This is interesting. As a species, it was our consumption of meats and animal fats that allowed us to develop brains capable of such intelligence. That is not to say that vegetarians will one day regress into chimpanzees. Such a notion is absurd.
For me, I have chosen the route of greatest practicality for my survival, health, and enjoyment of life (in that order, most of the time). As such, I remain omnivorous in behavior. This does not mean that I do not love animals, nor that I do not care for their suffering. I wish that all animals were raised in a clean, respectful, enjoyable environment. I wish that there was less waste produce by the animal product industry. I wish I was wealthier and lived in a more hospitable environment so that I could afford all local foods all of the time. Perhaps, someday, some of these wishes will become a reality. For now, I eat what I can afford and what is practical at the time.
I did not have a vegetarian phase as a child when I found out where meat comes from. I understood that cats eat mice, and lions eat gazelles. I understood that if a lion or tiger were to catch me, I would die and it would eat me and I would have no right to begrudge the animal my flesh. I know that if our positions were reversed, cattle would eat human flesh. It just so happens that we trod along this evolutionary path and they did not. History and retrospect will tell us if this is a good thing or not. Nevertheless, I am happy and grateful that I won the DNA lottery for this life.
Yes, I know the consumption of too much meat is hazardous to one's health. So is the consumption of too much of anything, including water. The greatest carcinogen known to man is oxygen. I have, on occasion glutted myself on meats and sea foods and suffered the digestive consequences of that. When I do stupid things like that, I meditate for awhile on my distress, thank the creatures that taught me this lesson and put me back in my place, and promise not to eat such a large quantity of meat again. Like all humans, I still sometimes forget. For that, I'm grateful too. If I ever achieve perfection, I shall have nothing left to look forward to and work towards. The thought of such a boring existence terrifies me.
I benefit from fruits and vegetables and plants brought to me from far away. I live my life in the north where no oranges and other high-citrus fruits grow. There are no rice-paddies in Canada. I have eaten chicken, turkey, duck, crab, lobster, fish, cow, pig, rabbit, moose, deer, clam, lamb, veal, eggs, milk products, horse, and even dog. Would I eat human if it were offered to me? Yes. I would take it and gratefully eat. I would wish to know the name and history of the person that I might pay proper respects to their spirit and family. I would even eat it if there were other things available for the sheer fact that the flesh would otherwise go to waste when it might benefit the lives of others. Of course, no one would eat someone who died of a disease. One would not eat an animal that died of a disease either. It makes sense.
I would not begrudge my flesh to others when I'm not using it anymore. I would rather that people not kill me for my flesh in the way we do to animals. How do I address this policy ethically? It is my belief that it is alright to raise, kill and eat creatures that are not the same species as myself.
I know that we are all part of the same ecosystem and in that spirit we are all one. So eating another being is rather like eating a part of myself. Strange to think of, yes. But wise. We are also all battling it out for a finite amount of nutrients circulating within that ecosystem. I value my life above everyone else's for while I am not alive, I can do no more good for the world nor indeed affect it or experience it in any way. This I believe until any afterlife should come along and show me the truth of things. Does this fit with Buddhist teachings in any way? I do not know. But it is practical.
That is all I have to say on vegetarianism for the moment.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:30 pm
A teacher was traveling with some of her students. At one of their stops they were served the meat of a pig. The students were horrified to see their teacher eating this forbidden food. "Teacher!" they cried "Is not the flesh of an animal forbidden by our order?"
The teacher went on chewing slowly, clearly savoring the taste of the pig. When she had finished she said, "Can you not see that it was a great and honored gift from these poor people to be given this delicacy? No doubt it was given at great cost to them and with an attitude of humbleness and generosity. Who am I to spurn their gift?"
"Besides," she said, taking another bite, "it is not what goes into your mouth that defiles you, but what comes out!"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:58 pm
Nice fable. (Is that what it's called?)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 5:32 am
Haha! Very good Lateralus 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:36 pm
That one's actually a Taoist story, although I'm not sure of the original source.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:44 pm
I don't eat that much meat, only turkey, eggs, and fish. But even then, I don't eat that too often. I guess I do it because I just don't like the taste of meat too much, but I know that it is healthy to do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:34 am
Lateralus es Helica That one's actually a Taoist story, although I'm not sure of the original source. Actually, I decided to look it up and the original quote comes from Matthew 15:11 Though the story itself is set in a Buddhist setting. And the word I was thinking of was parable. x3 Nice parable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:06 am
Naynram Ukir Lateralus es Helica That one's actually a Taoist story, although I'm not sure of the original source. Actually, I decided to look it up and the original quote comes from Matthew 15:11 Though the story itself is set in a Buddhist setting. And the word I was thinking of was parable. x3 Nice parable.
I pulled it from Tales from the Tao, but I can't say I'm entirely surprised to find it probably has biblical origins. Solala Towler wasn't clear sometimes on the sources of all the tales.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 5:44 pm
crystal_raye Akanishi Makoto The inherent problem is that plants are also alive, so although they are not conscious, they are not without volition. I've always felt/believed that plants were actually superconscious, and in a sense, born enlightened. That's something that really strikes me..I like that a lot. can you elaborate on it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|