|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:12 pm
Green Top Hat - GTH I said this sumwhere else but I'll say it again, I think The Undertaker is gonna go to 20 before he retires If he keeps out of the spotlight for most of the year and saves it all for the RR and onwards then it'll be possible.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:46 pm
Quote: That may be so, but I'm not bitching like a Mark would about how Shawn was retired. Think logically and you'd realize Taker was the only man for the Job. And before you say anything about Shawn losing twice to Taker at Mania is Bullshit. Think about this. Kane has faced Taker twice at Mania and loss both times. So losing twice to The Deadman at Mania is not bullshit. You think if the guy brought in to rival Taker in every way couldn't beat him there, what makes you think anyone else could? Secondly, Since Shawn was planning on retiring, anyways, why they put him over someone who is retiring as soon? your still not seeing my point. but it obvious by now that your not going to. Kane has by far been ******** over by the creative team more than anyone but s**t think about it, Jericho or HHH wouldve been a better choice hands down or better yet some young talent to push them over as HBK steps away. There is no benefit to Taker being the man to retire HBK. I didnt like that HBK retired Ric but thats what Ric wanted. This is all my opinion and it doesnt mean anything anyway but I cant honestly understand how anyone else could see it otherwise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:51 pm
The Maverick Jet Quote: That may be so, but I'm not bitching like a Mark would about how Shawn was retired. Think logically and you'd realize Taker was the only man for the Job. And before you say anything about Shawn losing twice to Taker at Mania is Bullshit. Think about this. Kane has faced Taker twice at Mania and loss both times. So losing twice to The Deadman at Mania is not bullshit. You think if the guy brought in to rival Taker in every way couldn't beat him there, what makes you think anyone else could? Secondly, Since Shawn was planning on retiring, anyways, why they put him over someone who is retiring as soon? Ever think maybe it's what HBK wanted? I'd rather be retired by a peer or someone I look up to. Taker's streak was a perfectly graceful way of getting out, it helps the company which is what he was all about at the end of his career. your still not seeing my point. but it obvious by now that your not going to. Kane has by far been ******** over by the creative team more than anyone but s**t think about it, Jericho or HHH wouldve been a better choice hands down or better yet some young talent to push them over as HBK steps away. There is no benefit to Taker being the man to retire HBK. I didnt like that HBK retired Ric but thats what Ric wanted. This is all my opinion and it doesnt mean anything anyway but I cant honestly understand how anyone else could see it otherwise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:41 pm
It's not a matter if you win or loose your final fight, but how great your last match was. I would rather loose a great fight, than win a poor, crappy one to finish my career.
Shawn's last match, while not as great as it could have been, was still a good match that I feel that if I were in his shoes, would be happy to call my last match.
While on the other side of the coin. Brett vs. Vince, I don't know if I would even call that a match, but even though the point of the match was for Hart to get revenge/retribution, whatever you want to call it for the Montreal screw job, if that is thee last thing Brett ever does in wrestling, I would be dissapointed with myself, and want to finish on a better note.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:18 pm
The Maverick Jet Quote: That may be so, but I'm not bitching like a Mark would about how Shawn was retired. Think logically and you'd realize Taker was the only man for the Job. And before you say anything about Shawn losing twice to Taker at Mania is Bullshit. Think about this. Kane has faced Taker twice at Mania and loss both times. So losing twice to The Deadman at Mania is not bullshit. You think if the guy brought in to rival Taker in every way couldn't beat him there, what makes you think anyone else could? Secondly, Since Shawn was planning on retiring, anyways, why they put him over someone who is retiring as soon? your still not seeing my point. but it obvious by now that your not going to. Kane has by far been ******** over by the creative team more than anyone but s**t think about it, Jericho or HHH wouldve been a better choice hands down or better yet some young talent to push them over as HBK steps away. There is no benefit to Taker being the man to retire HBK. I didnt like that HBK retired Ric but thats what Ric wanted. This is all my opinion and it doesnt mean anything anyway but I cant honestly understand how anyone else could see it otherwise 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:33 pm
HBK look up to Taker?...pfft, I couldn possibly see why. Taker has always been over rated. Hes a half a** decent wrestler and his only real strong point is how well he portrays his character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:56 pm
The Maverick Jet HBK look up to Taker?...pfft, I couldn possibly see why. Taker has always been over rated. Hes a half a** decent wrestler and his only real strong point is how well he portrays his character. And that's your opinion which is all well and good. People actually involved in these events clearly see otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:41 am
true but there again that all depends on who is and isnt a mark for taker. sadly alot of people are, and this thread may very well show that to be true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:45 am
Cartwright Fighter_guy Nakamura Vega Swagger winning the MITB and the 10 Diva Tag Match was the only disappointment at Wrestlemania. id say hart vs vince was .... i mean that has to be the worst moment in my wrestling experience ... and ive seen crappy backyard s**t It went 15 minutes too long. I'm not sure what people were expecting with this match. Bret survived a ******** stroke. So I don't know why anyone was expecting some glories wrestling match. It was going to be a Vince beat down. That's what I was expecting at lest. I don't know maybe its just me but I didn't see anything great coming out of this match, other then watching vince get his a** kicked.... again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
