|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:20 pm
So in a couple some odd months, I want to purchase a new rifle. My SKS is alright, but I want something more like a main battle rifle. What do you guy think of DSA's STG 58?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:58 pm
The one I shot was sweet as hell.
And I hear good about them.
They are expensive, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:43 pm
I'm willing to pay the price for one. I've always been a fan of the FN FAL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:56 am
I like it on principle, but I've been considering their Para Tactical version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:34 pm
What about an SVT-40, to go with your SKS? Ammo's cheap as dirt, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:22 am
Mr Savoy What about an SVT-40, to go with your SKS? Ammo's cheap as dirt, too. Mags are $100+. Nothanx.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:17 am
Fresnel Mr Savoy What about an SVT-40, to go with your SKS? Ammo's cheap as dirt, too. Mags are $100+. Nothanx. Real operators use clips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:40 am
Psh. No, real OPERATORs use PMAGS and that's all.
Trust me, I'm an OPERATOR myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:02 pm
I dislike it for the same reason I dislike the FAL: it's too ******** long. Being too ******** long and not as heavy sounds like a better deal though.
Not to say the FAL is a shitty gun, but it's just short of four feet long. They really couldn't have made it any shorter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:12 pm
Fresnel I dislike it for the same reason I dislike the FAL: it's too ******** long. Being too ******** long and not as heavy sounds like a better deal though. Not to say the FAL is a shitty gun, but it's just short of four feet long. They really couldn't have made it any shorter? They have shorty versions now. Just like they have ARs with long ******** barrels, and short ******** barrels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:03 pm
They make FAL's with 18 and 16 inch barrels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:44 pm
I actually like it a little more than the FAL in terms of looks. I think the fixed stock looks better than the FAL's folding stock.
It's basically just an Austrian FAL, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:58 am
uryu ishida Fresnel I dislike it for the same reason I dislike the FAL: it's too ******** long. Being too ******** long and not as heavy sounds like a better deal though. Not to say the FAL is a shitty gun, but it's just short of four feet long. They really couldn't have made it any shorter? They have shorty versions now. Just like they have ARs with long ******** barrels, and short ******** barrels. Though I have never seen an AR with a barrel longer than 24", I have heard of an AR-type weapon with a 30" barrel. In any case, a full-size, 20" AR is considerably more compact than a FAL with a comparable barrel length. I consider this a design flaw, personally. My SMLE has two inches on the FAL, and the No. 1 was designed before years began with "19".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
