| Whats your fave book |
| The Hunger Games |
|
87% |
[ 7 ] |
| Catching Fire |
|
12% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:23 am
Which book do you prefer or
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:30 am
The hunger games because i didnt like how peeta and katniss won, yet they had to go back in again!!!!!!!
it was horrible!!!!!!
but.............i like finnick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:43 pm
 [Memories is speaking]I loved them both! Catching Fire for including more details about the Hunger Games, district 13, and Gale, but The Hunger Games because it was the first and was better in the games than the second. I prefer the first though, it was just better. (Of course nothing can compare to 'Unless, unless. . .' from the second book. XD)[/Memories is done now]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:02 pm
Catching fire was great, but the hunger games focused more on the relationships and strain/despair of the heros (peeta+katniss) than catching fire did. plus in the second one, I didn't like the games, but it was a well planned out thing. (the fact the victors went back) it took the edge off of it all because its not children vs children. its adults vs elderly vs aldut teenagers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
[Memories is speaking]I didn't like that either. They should've at least only put in the adults and teens, just so age wasn't a problem. True, it was thought out and she was probably planning it all along, but it didn't leave you wanting more as much as the Hunger Games did. (That is until you get to the end. 'Katniss, there is no District 12')[/Memories is done now]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:36 pm
agreed. And you would think she would've went on with more detail about gale. Well now they have to get peeta away from the capitol and lead the rebellion, and possibly begin their new nation under the 'Mockingjay'. (Thats my prediction at least.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:52 am
It's really hard to choose because they're almost equally good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:56 pm
hunger games because there is more kanttis and peeta and more focus cathing fire had a lot more detals i jus dont like the ending. i wish in chatching fire there was more kissing and the weding actuly and peeta didnt lie about kattis being pregnet and such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 9:10 pm
The Hunger Games...in Catching Fire things seemed too jumbled. katniss was constantly in different places doing different things loving different people. but in a way it was unique because of that. Though I think there was more feeling in The Hunger Games. for instance, I cried when Rue died...catching fire is more action-packed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:42 pm
i love in the hunger games when their in the cave and peeta is telling her about when he first knew he hade first liked her!!! its soooooooooooooooooo romantic wahmbulance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:00 am
i prefer the hunger games as well because its more focused on what's going on inside the arena and I didn't like it when Gale got whipped in catching fire crying crying crying crying crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
