|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:03 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:06 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
It depends on how far back in the family tree one is willing to trace.
The Death Eaters and their like judged on the grandparents' magical ability which is where we get "Muggleborn" if all four grandparents cannot do magic, "pureblood" when all four can, and "halfblood" for any other mix of magic and nonmagic grandparents. Oh, plus they counted Muggleborn grandparents the same as Muggle ones.
I think that the magic gene can be both dominant or recessive, for if it was dominant all the time, we wouldn't have Squibs and if it was recessive all the time, we wouldn't have overflowing amounts of halfbloods. In fact, a better way to describe it would probably be that it is akin to the genes for skin color or eye color in Muggles.
For Muggleborns, and how they get the magic--the gene is there. A wizard or witch or squib was in their family, just far enough back that it would get ignored by the Wizarding Community.
As for the nonmagical child born of a wizard and a Muggle, well why don't you compare it to hair color? Say the mother had brown hair and the father had red. If the child is born with brown hair are you going to call it a non-redhead? It's a nonmagical child that takes after her mother. It's a Muggle.
A Squib is someone that is as pureblooded as the Malfoys or the Blacks or the Weasleys. Mrs. Figg and Mr. Filch both are purebloods. They just can't do magic. If Dean Thomas or Seamus Finnigan ended up nonmagical, do you think anyone could effectively call him a Squib? He's a half-blood. According to the DE, that could be the only result possible from tainting your blood by mixing with a Muggle.
Also, how pure indeed is the wizard? Are his magical genes strong enough to carry to the next generation? Or is he one step away from being a Muggle himself? Because, theoretically, if he's pureblooded, the children will have a hard time not being magical. That's how we get half-bloods, and there are plenty of those.
Going back to the original question, it could be either a Squib or a Wizard or Witch that married into a Muggle family and provided the gene for all the carriers.
And according to Jo, mixing the magic gene with the genetics of someone like Vernon Dursley is enough to kill the gene. So, I'm not sure how to apply that, except be thankful that not everyone in the Muggle world is like Dursley and that we even get Muggleborns.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|