Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Nintendo Defenders
IGN's Top Reasons to wait for the Revolution and not buy....

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

N t e r

PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:54 pm


an Xbox 360.

I won't copy and paste all of the stuff from this shockingly amazing article from IGN.com but I will quote those that made me want to touch my self.

Oh Gawd! -pool of blood-

"Reason #3: Revolution is Small, Stylish, and Quiet
Xbox 360 may have a stylish design, but the system is neither small nor quiet. These issues are not to be shrugged off or underestimated. Consumers today are more demanding than ever before. They want form and functionality. Case in point: Apple Computer has made a name for itself with products that meet the computing requirements of buyers without sacrificing hardware presentation. The design of Revolution would likely make Apple's people proud. It's gorgeous. Not only does its glossy white (or black) shell look like an Apple concept, but it's tiny, doing for consoles what iMac does for computers. Gamers can with Revolution fit the device anywhere and the chances are good that it will look outstanding. Complementing both the machine's design and its size is another welcomed truth: it's going to be incomprehensibly quiet, according to Nintendo.

These benefits may seem easy to dismiss, but trust us when we stress that they're worth your consideration. We've been playing with our Xbox 360s for a couple of weeks and they're big, they're bulky and they're loud. The 360's power adapter alone could probably serve as a foundation for a two-story house -- it's that big and obtrusive. And when powering through a game of Perfect Dark Zero, we need to turn the volume up to distract ourselves from the system's overbearing fan."

User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.
The Xbox 360's power adapter is roughly 1,000 times larger than Earth.

xD
Trust them and me when we say this, the Xbox 360's fan is like the sound of an air conditioner.
sweatdrop

Reason #4: True Backwards Compatibility
Microsoft calls Xbox 360 a backward compatible console, but that's not entirely true. The fact is, hundreds of Xbox games -- like The Chronicles of Riddick -- cannot yet be played on the company's latest machine. This is unfortunate because it means that 360 buyers will need to hold onto their original Xbox systems to play many older offerings, which is not ideal, particularly for minimalists who'd prefer to avoid clutter in their living rooms.

Revolution is in contrast the ultimate backward compatible console. It not only plays every GameCube title in existence, but potentially every game ever released for a Nintendo platform. The Big N refers to this functionality as a "virtual console." The system accepts both GameCube and Revolution discs into its slot-loading drive. Meanwhile, four controller ports and two Memory Pak slots located to one side of Revolution enable full GameCube support. But the fun doesn't stop there. Revolution works in conjunction with Nintendo's Wi-Fi Connection service, allowing users to connect to designated servers and download their favorite NES, S-NES and N64 games, all of which are fully playable.

Super Mario Bros. Super Mario World. Super Mario 64. Super Mario Sunshine. Super Mario 128. Five generations of AAA software. One console.

Xbox 360 cannot begin to compete.


I must somehow thank IGN for this article and giving me more faith in waiting for the Revolution. (I wonder what the Revolution's box will look like. >,< )
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:31 am


I read the whole article yesterday thinking, "mabye ill make a thread about this". Oh the irony! blaugh Anyyway, I like there picture of the Xbox 360's power cord. It is huge!

Mr._Stabby


Owl and Pussycat

PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:29 pm




Well...

Xbox 360

=

Panasonic 3DO.

Makes sence now eh?

PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:07 pm


3nodding xd

N t e r


Gaughan
Crew

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:02 am


[.SamusAran.]


Well...

Xbox 360

=

Panasonic 3DO.

Makes sence now eh?

IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!

...

Caps xp
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:51 pm


all i have to say to the 360 fans:

you may have a 360 tac on to xbox2's name...but my revolution will have 360 games of classical goodness and new to play.

thats what i will have to say whenever i get one.

Rockman JET


N t e r

PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:41 pm


Lol, Nice.
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:47 pm


Rockman JET
all i have to say to the 360 fans:

you may have a 360 tac on to xbox2's name...but my revolution will have 360 games of classical goodness and new to play.

thats what i will have to say whenever i get one.

Nice.

It did weird me out when I heard that you cannot play all Xbox titles on the 360...after they say it has backwards compatability. Backwards compatability doesn't mean it can play the games released X amount of months before the new system came out but not the ones before that...it means it can play them all. Perfect example is the GameBoy line. Every new gameboy up to the GBA can play all the old games, which makes a library of what would be a few hundred titles, into a library of potentially thousands...same with the GB Player for GC.


Viva la Revolution.

TurMacar


Rockman JET

PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:56 pm


I Macar
Rockman JET
all i have to say to the 360 fans:

you may have a 360 tac on to xbox2's name...but my revolution will have 360 games of classical goodness and new to play.

thats what i will have to say whenever i get one.

Nice.

It did weird me out when I heard that you cannot play all Xbox titles on the 360...after they say it has backwards compatability. Backwards compatability doesn't mean it can play the games released X amount of months before the new system came out but not the ones before that...it means it can play them all. Perfect example is the GameBoy line. Every new gameboy up to the GBA can play all the old games, which makes a library of what would be a few hundred titles, into a library of potentially thousands...same with the GB Player for GC.


Viva la Revolution.


yep , but you would think Gates would of wanted backwards captability for the 360. either way the console market is now adays held by xbox but by the time revolution comes out i bet nintendo will have it once again as for ps 3, from what i have heard will be crap.
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:29 am


Rockman JET
I Macar
Rockman JET
all i have to say to the 360 fans:

you may have a 360 tac on to xbox2's name...but my revolution will have 360 games of classical goodness and new to play.

thats what i will have to say whenever i get one.

Nice.

It did weird me out when I heard that you cannot play all Xbox titles on the 360...after they say it has backwards compatability. Backwards compatability doesn't mean it can play the games released X amount of months before the new system came out but not the ones before that...it means it can play them all. Perfect example is the GameBoy line. Every new gameboy up to the GBA can play all the old games, which makes a library of what would be a few hundred titles, into a library of potentially thousands...same with the GB Player for GC.


Viva la Revolution.


yep , but you would think Gates would of wanted backwards captability for the 360. either way the console market is now adays held by xbox but by the time revolution comes out i bet nintendo will have it once again as for ps 3, from what i have heard will be crap.

What have you heard? ninja

...and is it official or rumors?

TurMacar


Rockman JET

PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:37 pm


I Macar
Rockman JET
I Macar
Rockman JET
all i have to say to the 360 fans:

you may have a 360 tac on to xbox2's name...but my revolution will have 360 games of classical goodness and new to play.

thats what i will have to say whenever i get one.

Nice.

It did weird me out when I heard that you cannot play all Xbox titles on the 360...after they say it has backwards compatability. Backwards compatability doesn't mean it can play the games released X amount of months before the new system came out but not the ones before that...it means it can play them all. Perfect example is the GameBoy line. Every new gameboy up to the GBA can play all the old games, which makes a library of what would be a few hundred titles, into a library of potentially thousands...same with the GB Player for GC.


Viva la Revolution.


yep , but you would think Gates would of wanted backwards captability for the 360. either way the console market is now adays held by xbox but by the time revolution comes out i bet nintendo will have it once again as for ps 3, from what i have heard will be crap.

What have you heard? ninja

...and is it official or rumors?


official: the ps 3 is going to suck.
rumored: nintendo will own the market.
PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:10 pm


Rockman JET
I Macar
Rockman JET
I Macar
Rockman JET
all i have to say to the 360 fans:

you may have a 360 tac on to xbox2's name...but my revolution will have 360 games of classical goodness and new to play.

thats what i will have to say whenever i get one.

Nice.

It did weird me out when I heard that you cannot play all Xbox titles on the 360...after they say it has backwards compatability. Backwards compatability doesn't mean it can play the games released X amount of months before the new system came out but not the ones before that...it means it can play them all. Perfect example is the GameBoy line. Every new gameboy up to the GBA can play all the old games, which makes a library of what would be a few hundred titles, into a library of potentially thousands...same with the GB Player for GC.


Viva la Revolution.


yep , but you would think Gates would of wanted backwards captability for the 360. either way the console market is now adays held by xbox but by the time revolution comes out i bet nintendo will have it once again as for ps 3, from what i have heard will be crap.

What have you heard? ninja

...and is it official or rumors?


official: the ps 3 is going to suck.
rumored: nintendo will own the market.

Thanks for the recap...but from what sources of information do you draw this conclusion?

TurMacar


RAPTOR948

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:41 pm


well anything relating to quality, the ps3 is regurgitating the SAME control sceme, the same EXACT buttons, but a new design for the controllers look, it's mostly the same, as button placement is the same as before, hich is s**t waiting to be regurgitated.

the Revolution is employing NEW controls, a new design, and will use Gamecube controllers. ^_^

in the ps3 it'll be crap from regurgitation, and immitation. the Revolution will be far better due to originality. and the xbox 360 is a overbearing loud screaming liar.

pretty pathetic when people think the immitators are gonna win when they're regurgitating the same old s**t as before, once is enough, but twice is just plain disgraceful, and highly dissapointing. the buttons could've been put in a different place or given different shapes to make it slightly easier or harder to memorize controls, mix it up, thats what the future is about! mix it up, dont leave it the same, history repeating itself is boring and pointless, and makes you regret too much.
Reply
Nintendo Defenders

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum