This is from
here.
"Another curious argument of Pascal's is that which is known as the argument of the wager. God exists or He does not exist, and we must of necessity lay odds for or against Him.
•If I wager
for and God
is -- infinite gain;
•If I wager
for and God
is not -- no loss.
•If I wager
against and God
is -- infinite loss;
•If I wager
against and God
is not -- neither loss nor gain.
In the second case there is an hypothesis wherein I am exposed to the loss of everything. Wisdom, therefore, counsels me to make the wager which insures my winning all or, at worst losing nothing. "
I've been lucky to be raised Catholic and to have faith in God. I have stumbled, sure, but I have always had Him at my side when I needed Him. I've never thought of it in this way, and it really is good logic for those who aren't so certain. If I wasn't sure, I would wager in defense of God's existence, because I can win everything, and at worst lose nothing, instead of risking losing everything, or losing nothing but also having no opportunity of gain.
mrgreen