|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:38 pm
What I present is assuming that there is more to the 'effects' of things related to the occult then just on the mind of the individual. I remember a discussion I had with someone who would probably fit the definition of a "mentor" to the majority of people. Our discussion touched on the topic of people on an occult path, and if they achieved any kind of practical consistency. He said something to the effect of, " When people figure out how to do magic, they rob others of the ability to choose.". The idea was that a persons free will was being infringed on, or denied to them, because they weren't being given the ability to make a choice when someone uses occult means to create an effect on the environment/reality. This seems to assume/imply that the person who has figured out how to do magic is capable of things bordering, or actually, on the fantastical side of claims made over the years. I also think this assumes/implies that a person is in more control of their life then most believe. I have seen some arguments to justify people using anything that would be related to the occult for personal gain as acceptable to do. Situational examples aside, the idea was that it wasn't any more 'unfair' then other people who were 'gifted' in ways that are, or seem to be, more mundane using their 'gifts' to their advantage. I think circumstances are likely significant to what would be 'fair', atleast in a discussion, but I think a discussion of that nature would best be left to another thread. I think a more important concern would be what people actually do. It seems to me that few aspects of the occult aren't directly linked to personal gain, and it seems fewer don't have potential for application to achieve personal gain in one way or another. It seems that this might be a somewhat important part of living a magical life. What you believe is the reason for existing/being here, what the afterlife might be like, and any ideals you have about life, society, etc, might have an impact on your answer(s). Do you think people are being robbed of their ability to make a choice? How do you feel about the idea of living in a world where you can rob others of their ability to make a choice, and it can happen to you? What do you think about the circumstances in regards to what most people seem capable of? How do you feel about the circumstances regarding the potential possibilities? Do you use anything to influence aspects of the environment/reality/your life? If you were exceptionally gifted in one way or another, would you make use of it? Anything you'd care to share or add?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:55 pm
Dorian Requiem What I present is assuming that there is more to the 'effects' of things related to the occult then just on the mind of the individual. I remember a discussion I had with someone who would probably fit the definition of a "mentor" to the majority of people. Our discussion touched on the topic of people on an occult path, and if they achieved any kind of practical consistency. He said something to the effect of, " When people figure out how to do magic, they rob others of the ability to choose.". The idea was that a persons free will was being infringed on, or denied to them, because they weren't being given the ability to make a choice when someone uses occult means to create an effect on the environment/reality. This seems to assume/imply that the person who has figured out how to do magic is capable of things bordering, or actually, on the fantastical side of claims made over the years. I also think this assumes/implies that a person is in more control of their life then most believe. I have seen some arguments to justify people using anything that would be related to the occult for personal gain as acceptable to do. Situational examples aside, the idea was that it wasn't any more 'unfair' then other people who were 'gifted' in ways that are, or seem to be, more mundane using their 'gifts' to their advantage. I think circumstances are likely significant to what would be 'fair', atleast in a discussion, but I think a discussion of that nature would best be left to another thread. I think a more important concern would be what people actually do. Silly concept. Magic is no different than anything else. I have an IQ higher than 100, and I feel no guilt taking a better job than the guy with 100 IQ. Other than certain injuries, I am healthy; I feel no guilt for climbing higher than most when I go to Arches National Park, and I have the photos to prove it. If I use magic to encourage rain to dump on my spot of land instead of someone else's, yes, their crops might be smaller... but mine will flourish. We are all selfish, and I have no problem using every resource available to me to get what I want. Ce la vie. An advantage is an advantage.Quote: It seems to me that few aspects of the occult aren't directly linked to personal gain, and it seems fewer don't have potential for application to achieve personal gain in one way or another. It seems that this might be a somewhat important part of living a magical life. What you believe is the reason for existing/being here, what the afterlife might be like, and any ideals you have about life, society, etc, might have an impact on your answer(s). Do you think people are being robbed of their ability to make a choice? No. Magic may alter their environment or chances at something, but even magic that changes a person is rarely successful. Where it is successful, it's often a habit or behavior that the person wants to change regardless. Otherwise, temporary changes... but, like hypnotism, I personally have never heard of magic permanently changing someone against their will. It doesn't stick, or something.Quote: How do you feel about the idea of living in a world where you can rob others of their ability to make a choice, and it can happen to you? If you would do it to others, you deserve to have it done to you. This would either be justice (is after the fact), pre-emptive revenge (for those of us who subscribe to that...), or teaching someone the meaning of the Golden Rule so that they never choose to do it in the first place.
What I know is that, in this world, people do rob others of choice. The rulers of Burma rob their people of the choice to speak openly. The rulers of North Korea rob their people of the choice to know the truth about the world. The rulers of China rob their people of the choice of whether or not to see artistic nude on deviantart.com (by freguently banning the site entirely). Parents rob their children of the choice of where to live, what school to go to, and often who they can be friends with/date/marry if they don't want to be put on the street. I rob my husband of the choice to bring pot home and smoke it, because the Uniform Code of Military Justice robs me of the choice to have it in my home, no matter how legal possession is in the state of Colorado. Choice is a privilege and a blessing, not a right.Quote: What do you think about the circumstances in regards to what most people seem capable of? Granted, I have seen little practical magic, and what I have does not indicate the ability to take away my choices. But, given all that, I'd have to say that I laugh at the idea that I can't fight back if I want to. If I fight back (admittedly unlikely, for a variety of reasons), someone is going down. Magic is will, is it not? Even in mundane circumstances, where there is a will, there is a way. If I had the genuine desire to fight someone of something like that, you d*mn well better believe I'll win.Quote: How do you feel about the circumstances regarding the potential possibilities? ...Vague. I don't know how to answer this question, because I do not understand the query.Quote: Do you use anything to influence aspects of the environment/reality/your life? Yes.Quote: If you were exceptionally gifted in one way or another, would you make use of it? I guess I already answered this above... but yes. I would, can, and do.Quote: Anything you'd care to share or add? *shrug*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:26 pm
First I want to say that regardless of what we do, magical or not, we are affecting others, even if it is very minutely. Chaos Theory says that a butterfly flapping it's wings in the Pacific can start a hurricane in the Atlantic. Everything we do has an effect on everything else around us. So what makes this any more innocent than a conscious effort to use magic to affect the world?
Perhaps it's the same thing that governs mundane actions. Most would agree it's wrong to interfere directly in someone's life, even if you think it's for their benefit because you deprive them of free will intentionally. I think the same thing applies to any kind of magic you might use to target someone. I think that as long as you make a note not to harm anyone in whatever you do, you can't be held at fault.
I think the main issue in using magic or whatever you want to call it for personal gain is that being selfish is usually a very good way to feed the ego and thus shut down any intuitive or psychic/magical abilities you might have. Provided, most goals are selfish, but there's a difference between "I want to get a good job," and "I want a million dollars." There's a difference between "I want a partner that loves me," and "I want to have sex with hot women."
And this could be an arbitrary difference, but I tend to hold to the belief that you reap what you sow, and if you sow ill intentions that's what you're going to get.
Do I use my abilities to affect my environment? I use what I best describe as my mind to move small objects. Trivial when you think about it, but you have to lift a 50lb. weight before you can lift a 100lb. weight. Any other time I might use abilities is for personal healing or enhancement of attributes. I like to think I'm rather unobtrusive with whatever I'm doing. Sometimes I get a sense of the emotional or mental state of a person, maybe a faint glimpse into their current thought process, but this isn't an intentional thing. I just think I'm very perceptive to this, being a rather emotionally sensitive person.
I *have* to believe that I'll be able to do more than move a piece of aluminum or paper, otherwise I won't ever be able to. We're inhibited by what we believe is possible. If we believe something isn't possible then it doesn't matter if it is or isn't, because we limit ourselves.
The questions I have to consider tend to relate to "What would I do if I actually could do something substantial with my ability?" I spend so much time in the quest for power that I hardly stop to think of what I would really do if I acquired a large amount of it. Retribution or personal gain are cursory motivations, but would I really be able to go through with it? I don't know.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 8:10 am
A line from a passage I just read: "Most Vodouisants would scoff at [being morally opposed to love spells]. To them, love spells are no more coercive than wearing a sharp suit or a revealing dress to catch your prospective partner's eye." That said, using Cologne is a little less manipulative than using Rohypnol - I suppose it depends on how you define manipulation (and from there, how you define free will).
Personally, I don't think I could formulate a philosophy that would stand up as well as one by (insert favourite speaker on ethics here), so I don't try to. I can understand that that would seem infuriatingly immature to many people, to which I don't have much of a reply beyond the fact that ultimately, ethics is secular religion (or impractical politics, if you like). I'll leave the moral debates for those who're good at it.
Ultimately though, I tend to go for what feels natural, since one way or another I'd be able to justify my actions (i.e., Machiavellian/Nietzschean [is that even a word?] ideology of becoming the essential Alpha Human versus the golden rule of Do Unto Others...) Most of the time, I'd shy away from manipulating other people, especially if it's on a grand scale - but if it's something relatively minor, or the person isn't really exercising their will anyway, I don't feel too guilty: in fact, I'd understand if the same was done to me. It only really becomes an issue when amped up through hyperbole and/or absolutism (Of the order of the argument "You shouldn't pick leaves off trees, because if everyone in the world did that, it would devastate the biosphere" - hell, if everyone in the world could show that kind of unity it'd be astounding).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:22 pm
For the most part, the people who come to me do so because they are unhappy with the situation their own circumstances and choices have created over time. What I do helps bring about clarity and favorable circumstances to help them move on. Sure, one could make the argument that I'm infringing on their right to suffer until they can pull their head out, but...well, they're asking for help. What kind of asshat would I be if I said no? I've never yet told anybody they *have* to do anything, but I have pointed out where they're standing in their own way, and demonstrated other ways to be. What they do with that information and guidance is up to them.
Aside from that, most of the time I'm working with troubled spirits, and all I do is send them where they need to go. If they didn't want to get sent, they shouldn't have bothered somebody who knew how. Freedom of choice means freedom to accept the consequences.
To correlate with Mitsh's once-again excellent posting, which I agree with in its entirety, an actual exchange from a favorite family story: "What would the ocean be like if everyone peed in it?" "...Warm."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|