khawk622
My theory is that existence is "bigger." What I think is that non-existence has to exist for there to be "non-existence." Therefor, it becomes part of existence causing it to "grow." Anyone agree? Anyone have an argument?
sweatdrop Some scientists think that there is both existence and non-existence; what they mean by this is that there is life, and non-life. Life is created by energy, so anything that has energy is considered life; but since energy is made of chemicals, they question, should they put chemicals under 'existence' since it's a smaller factor of life. Non-existence is only the forms of chemicals and such that haven't taken amino-acid, protein, bacteria, life-forms. But non-existence is involved with existence.
Does that help?
Reply
