|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:20 pm
Snare Drum and the Quads. To build up that much technique and be good takes YEARS.
If you can play the snare or quads and be musical at the same time, then that is talent.
Though I'd also expect any double reed instrument to be just as hard to do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:31 pm
I tend to find string instrument to be my downfall in the musical world...but that might just be because of my small hands sweatdrop
Really, it depends on the individual players strengths an weakness' someone may not be as good with the emboucher for a double reed instrument than other people, or might find more diffuculty with complex fingerings on an instrument with many holes/keys/valves than usual, or maybe someone doesn't have enough air to play the larger instruments.
differently sized lips are better/worse for different instruments, hand size can be a factor...
I've a friend who would say any brass instrument to this question, just because she can't buzz her lips to save her life. *shrugs*
xD I can't do a roll on the snare drum to save MY life, so yeah...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:49 am
i always hear it's french horn, clarinet, oboe, and flute. i agree about the flute but i've never in my life played french horn, clarinet, or oboe. flute takes a while to get a sound out. took me like 2 months to even get a sound out. smile saxophone is the easiest though. i learned it in like a week. i guess it's also because i played the flute b4 i learned sax. piano's pretty hard too because u gotta learn to read not only one cleft like a wind instrument, but bass and treble! i'm still learning bass cleft cuz i've played treble all my life. (sax, flute, and electric guitar.) but even my bd says that sax is the easiest. sorry for my novel on every post. smile i can never have a short response smile
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|